this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2026
599 points (98.4% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

3075 readers
868 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

Introduction to Socialism (external links)

Wiki

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cheat700000007@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

Was this redrawn from memory? Wtf is going on with the art

[–] enphurgen@lemmy.world 18 points 14 hours ago

If their actions threaten our livelihood and health, standing up for yourself is really just self defense.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 10 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

It's not the CEO, it's the shareholder class (and the system).

CEOs are just lapdogs with a job.
Shareholders dictate what CEOs (management board) objectives are. Is usually profit. If their job was to maximise wages, CEOs would try anything to achieve that.

Ppl will really think CEOs that affect profit by 0.01% are the issue, not where the vast profit goes, and why is profit king above all else (human lives & ecosystems included).

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

In most cases CEOs are also shareholders. And often the majority shareholders. Their bonuses are often made up of shares. They are in most cases the same cunts.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 1 points 22 minutes ago

Yes, it is a rigged system.

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

The CEO is still the top-paid employee, who has a golden parachute in their contract, and will happily fuck over as many employees and lives as needed to make the bottom line look good. And they can influence a lot.

Example, if you kill one, Anthem BlueCross BlueShield will revert to the Anesthesia Policy they had planned. So they do have some impact.

[–] Shindo66@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

I think youre actually agreeing in a round about way. The ceo is beholden to the shareholders who just want the stock price to go up. You have to pay a ceo that much money because they see the books, they see the profit, they have a hard job to do selling out their own employees. How much does your soul cost? Well, for some ceos its 20 million. Theyre the train conductor running the train down the rails of profit over people.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Agreed.

It's also why the extreme change you described was so small.

[–] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 23 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Why is Lisa’s face so weird?

[–] AzuranAurora@piefed.ca 20 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Shittily redrawn or recreated with AI, the original meme format looks fine. The original episode the meme is from dates back to 2001, so it's in standard definition and looks blurry compared to what we're used to nowadays. I guess someone thought the meme needed to look more "clear" or HD, so they did this without considering how it mangled her face in the process.

Note that there's only 4 audience members instead of 5, and the lighting and shading is entirely different too.

[–] enphurgen@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 5 points 13 hours ago

Dental plan!

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 20 points 19 hours ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_murder

a concept used to describe an unnatural death that is believed to occur due to social, political, or economic oppression, instead of direct violence.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 4 points 17 hours ago

Good message defeated by what looks like an ai render of the meme

[–] NostraDavid@programming.dev -2 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

OK, can we stop randomly redefining "violence" to be whatever we do not like?

We already have a word that perfectly fits here: Exploitation

Knock it off. Thanks.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Violence isn't always physical.

[–] NostraDavid@programming.dev 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

violence /ˈvʌɪəl(ə)n(t)s/ behaviour involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.

That's the common definition. In which case would violence not entail a physical action?

Where is this idea coming from that violence isn't physical?

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com 1 points 1 hour ago

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines violence as "the intentional use of physical force or power, threatened or actual, against oneself, another person, or against a group or community, which either results in or has a high likelihood of resulting in injury, death, psychological harm, maldevelopment, or deprivation"

Withholding basic stuffs like housing through state violence is definitely a form of violence

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

This isn't redefining anything, violence takes many forms, not just broken glass. There's mental violence, economic, sociological, cultural, verbal.

[–] NostraDavid@programming.dev 0 points 3 hours ago

OK, can you give me the definition of violence that you use? Because the common one is:

behaviour involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.

You remind me of my Christian parents who redefined "religious" to mean "following the laws of the Bible", which they claim they don't because they follow Jesus instead, so my Christian parents now claim not to be religious, even though the common definition is "relating to or believing in a religion." - simple as that. It feels really silly to do that. Cult-ish, even.

[–] RockBottom@feddit.org -5 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Well, that CEO salary raises the average pay.

[–] eskimofry@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

50 years of wage history proves you are a bootlicker or ignorant, or an ignorant bootlicker.

https://www.epi.org/publication/ceo-compensation-2018/

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 7 points 17 hours ago

I'm fairly certain they were saying that ironically...

[–] RockBottom@feddit.org 1 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Sorry, I honestly thought it would raise the average pay, which in turn is used to promote capitalism.

[–] eskimofry@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

Sounds like you're new to the world. Averages bury the lede. Median wages show a better picture.

[–] Banana@sh.itjust.works 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I'm pretty sure thats what Rockbottom is saying. They're speaking descriptively, not prescriptively.

Their first comment was said tongue-in-cheek.

[–] RockBottom@feddit.org 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Right, can't be said often enough. But we should never forget the shareholders, who want it this way.

[–] NostraDavid@programming.dev 2 points 17 hours ago

It does. People are just being dumb. (and yes... median wages do show a better picture).

I, for one, understand that you agree with OP.

[–] NostraDavid@programming.dev 3 points 17 hours ago

My apologies for the stupid users here, that don't understand you.

think_mark_think.jpg