this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2026
1299 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

84019 readers
3316 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 6 days ago (3 children)

This is the real way to hurt a company. Once an open source version exists, even if it is not as good as the commercial offering, they will have trouble convincing people to pay for what they are selling.

Of course, they should be compensated for their work, but if you can build it yourself then the cost to a company does not need to be much higher than the costs of parts and labor for someone else to do it for you.

One of the things I want to do is build decent applications and release them for free so people can get the same functionality of their paid apps but not need to pay anything.

Main thing stopping me is time.

[–] pelya@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Military tech companies will be perfectly fine. They typically have 10+ year contracts, and military equipment has a huge price margin in exchange for being reliable and field-serviceable, and the main disadvantage of DIY radar is reliability (unless you also recruit the guy who built it into the army).

It will probably impact civilian market more, where the same companies will try to sell you an unnecessarily hardened machined aluminium box full of cheap Chinese electronics, camo painted for an additional ten thousand bucks.

Their next commercial offering might just be cheaper.

[–] picnic@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Dont forget support

[–] lithiumground@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Commercial companies will copy it to improve its product and sell

[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 34 points 6 days ago (3 children)

ITT: A bunch of people who think they know a lot about radar, expect to run their own radar at home, and think they can do it better for cheaper.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

Look, if I could point this thing at the ground and get soil moisture at depth, I wouldn't be in this situation ok.

[–] musubibreakfast@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Honestly if I have fun building it then I'll spend 80 to build my own but if I need it right now then I'll probably buy a ready made one. It's basically the difference between my home pc and the mac I use for office work.

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Just do like Musk did and only use cameras. It'll be fiiiineeee.

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 17 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Not sure if this is a good idea. As far as I know radars operate on a regulated frequency and you need a permit to use in most countries. There was also some incident a few years ago where the beam of a radar station would clearly show up on the cloud coverage maps of weather stations because they used the same frequency.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 12 points 6 days ago

This is, to be fair, mentioned in the article. Cool project nonetheless!

[–] iglou@programming.dev 10 points 6 days ago

That should never be a reason not to share open source knowledge!

[–] elaina@lemmy.zip 7 points 6 days ago

morocco mentioned 🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (8 children)

So what use would a private citizen or business have for a system like this? I'm not sure who the "commercial offerings" are meant for.

[–] TehWorld@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

I mean. I like cool electronic gadgets. It’d probably be fun to play with.

[–] Nindelofocho@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

This would be a lot of fun for those of us who like messing with radios and antennas

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Im mostly speculating but the stuff that comes to mind is hunting, fishing, weather, private space company, shipping company (air and sea), and tbh even military contracting firms are also considered private commercial businesses. Radar is super useful if you can afford it

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Ahh yes.. let me just go hunting with my beamforming radar.. I'll be tracking the rate at which that deer is changing course at over 100khz.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Foofighter@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 6 days ago

Mir first thought where "low budget" battlefields and high budget personal security.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Cheap electronic warfare devices?

Maybe an island/area looking to set up a small air traffic control center for non commercial airlines? Not sure if the range would be enough, I know nothing about them

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] arsCynic@piefed.social 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Now do the Internet please.

[–] qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

Seems really cool but I'll need to read more on this! I dont fully get it

load more comments
view more: next ›