this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
324 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

83799 readers
3102 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The policy change follows years of Meta and its chief executive Mark Zuckerberg’s pivot of political convenience toward President Donald Trump and his base. Following Trump’s second electoral victory, Meta quickly changed its speech rules to allow for anti-transgender slurs and dehumanization of immigrants, The Intercept previously reported, aligning the company with longtime MAGA culture war grievances.

Asked about the new restrictions on the word “antifa,” Meta spokesperson Erica Sackin pointed to a March transparency report that noted the company would “remove QAnon and Antifa content when combined with content-level threat signals.” The report does not explain what those signals are. Meta did not respond when asked if the company had discussed its antifa speech rules with the Trump administration.

Meta largely outsources the enforcement of its Community Standards rules to low-paid contractors whose interpretation and application of the policies can vary. The company’s automated, algorithmic content moderation systems are also famously glitchy. This combination can result in erratic censorship, particularly when political ideology is classified as violent or terroristic.

all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works 3 points 53 minutes ago

Looks like Zuck is all in and has no choice but to support evil, because if/when the evil collapses, so does Zuck. Must be stressful for him as history has shown that this behaviour eventually catches up to them. Sadly, some make it too old age and run entire countries before it catches up which causes a lot of unnecessary suffering.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

You cannot be pro Democracy without being Antifa. If you do not support fascism, you are antifa.

Fuck you Mark Cuckerberg.

[–] Janx@piefed.social 30 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Conservative voters are so stupid, they actually think Antifa and Anonymous are official, trademarked, centralized organizations. Just start saying the full thing, "anti-fascist" when describing protestors, etc...

The right love their bogeymen.

[–] leoj@piefed.social 24 points 6 hours ago

As a self proclaimed leftist who has been to many protests, I have never once heard anyone say the word Antifa except for my Maga boss when he thought Antifa was going to come and rob his house after the BLM protests...

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 hours ago

Is "Pro-Constitution" and "Anti-Tyranny" gonna be on a list of banned words?

[–] stickly@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago

No no officer I didn't say antifa. I said I was a fashopp (Fascism Opponent)

[–] puppinstuff@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 hours ago

Anybody taking bets on what the “unalive” equivalent of antifacist is going to be?

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 51 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (7 children)

No anti-fascist calls themselves antifa and being anti-fascist is the default state of being for every single person who is not a fascist.

'Antifa' is a fabricated scare term prompted by the right-wing elite's media influence campaign. It exists as a term in order to imply that there is some actual secret organization which can be presented as the boogey man to scare working-class people and/or to label as a terrorist organization so the elites in power can use the power of law enforcement to attack and jail their monied political opponents by claiming their association with or funding of a 'known domestic terror group'.

Anything saying 'antifa' on social media is either intentional propaganda or the ignorant masses propagating those same memes.

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 2 points 1 hour ago

No anti-fascist calls themselves antifa

Maybe in murica, but not in Germany

[–] eldebryn@lemmy.world 13 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

That's really not true. I've seen the term antifa (standing for anti-fascism) used plenty for many decades now.

We've had antifa spray tags in my school's walls.

It may seems obscure to some parts of the world but for those of us who suffered under fascism multiple times (south Europe) it's a very familiar phrase from a long time before trump become president.

[–] zeejoo@thelemmy.club 1 points 49 minutes ago* (last edited 49 minutes ago)

In the US though he's absolutely correct. It's just not a term anyone but MAGAts use. This rule really is only gonna censor the people trying to fear monger, and not any actual "antifa members" because they don't exist.

[–] DistrictSIX@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 hours ago

Antifa is, as far as I know, the US abbreviation for Anti Fascist Action. This was an organization founded in the eighties in the UK with decentralized local chapters with the ability to mobilize. They were out in the streets violently confronting the fascists. It died out in the late nineties

Copy cat groupings had started appearing in other European countries by that time. In Sweden, we called them AFA. The antifa logo I've seen in US media is the logo of Anti Fascist Action. But that's just my understanding.

[–] Mudman@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 hours ago

I think the term antifa was originally just that- short for anti fascist. But it got hijacked and slandered and labeled teroor org. By entities that felt encouraged to do that.

But you're definitely right. Being an anti fascist is a default state of human being.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

I’m right here. Your dear Aunt Tifa.

[–] SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I really hope enough people know this.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago

Maybe Iran will put out a Lego video explaining it.

"Iran, if you're listening..."

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] silverneedle@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, Anti-fascism is old.

My point is that the specific word "Antifa" has only been used since 2016 in the US.

[–] streetcoder@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Definetly used world wide at least since the 80s and yes basically meaning anti fascist.

[–] greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo 1 points 4 hours ago

yes, but it wasn't being weaponised as a brand, is what they're getting at, until 2016. Before that it wasn't being used like a cudgel.

[–] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 97 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

child exploitation and hate speech, cool cool cool. any mention of a loose-knit global movement against fascism that has existed for decades, that's dangerous. priorities!

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 52 points 11 hours ago

The only criterion is: are billionaires into it, or does it threaten them?

[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 18 points 11 hours ago

I can’t believe anybody uses products from this company anymore.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 28 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

tl;dr this new policy is dumb and bad. References to specific things like Antifa make no logical sense as a grounds for censorship, because there were already reasonable rules in place to handle actual problems.

In some cases, the content that Meta considers a threat signal is commonsensical. If, for instance, a user mentions bringing a weapon to an event, the company flags it as a threat signal. But in other cases, Meta’s process for identifying threat signals is more vague. Under the new rules, Meta might trigger a threat signal when a user posts a “visual depiction of a weapon,” a “reference to arson, theft, or vandalism,” or “military language,” if accompanied by the word “antifa.”

If “antifa” is mentioned in the context of “references to historical or recent incidents of violence” — a category so sprawling that it includes “historic wars” and “battles” — that post will also be penalized. Should Meta apply this rule as written, the company could, for instance, restrict posts comparing the antifascist nature of World War II to the contemporary antifa movement.

It's difficult to believe any intellectual discussion would happen on Facebook, but this rule further cements the suppression of it.

[–] FaygoRedPop@lemmy.world 11 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (3 children)

So the bots and borderline mentally handicapped senior citizens that use Facebook can no longer say "antifa".

Whatever.

I have a Facebook account with a fake name so I can peruse Marketplace. The shit that it tried to get me view is literally insane. A outrage inducing AI post that's clearly fake with thousands of comments littered with spelling errors that are barely even readable. Facebook makes me realize how Trump was elected. People are very very very stupid. Go see for yourself. You won't believe your eyes.

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

There are a lot of angry, religiously brainwashed, abused, hurting, failed by the education system, willfully ignorant, racist, sexist, authoritarian, bandwagoning, sociopathic, narcissistic, confused, regressed, selfish people out there. That's why I don't think we'll fix our country without first fixing our relationships with our neighbors. Getting Grandma Geraldine to log off Facebook and touch grass is probably a good thing. But can we wake everyone up to the technofascist plan in time? I think we're very close to finding out and it makes me uncomfortable.

All the sheeple say "baaaaahhhh"!

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago

I don’t need more proof.

[–] cranakis@reddthat.com 2 points 10 hours ago

"Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that." George Carlin

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 7 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

Ok, we can write anti-fascist...it's just a tiny bit more verbose...

...right?

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

You should never use the term antifa, ever.

It's a right-wing scare term, don't help them by spreading the meme.

You don't need a term for anti-fascist, just like you don't need a term for anti-murderer or anti-slaver. It's the default state for any sane person who isn't under the influence of the fascist population.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

sure, but two questions:

How do you position yourself when the default opposition is fascist (there is no official left party in parliament eg Hungary, US)?

Who are all the dudes in "antifa" online spaces, is it all just a CIA honeypot or are they just kiddies?

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

You can be anti-fascist and call yourself as such (though, I'd argue that everyone is anti-fascist by default). Just don't use 'antifa'

The term 'antifa' specifically is a right-wing meme that's being intentionally loaded with a bunch of negative connotations. This meme exists to support scaring the labor class voters away from the left, dividing the class against itself and to attack the monied elites who support left-wing causes by using the legal apparatuses that were created post-9/11 to target 'terrorism'.

By accepting and propagating that term you're helping the right to apply their memetically poisoned label to their enemies.

We have a whole generation of Americans who suffered and died fighting fascism. We call them the Greatest Generation. Patriots, heroes, and veterans... not antifa.

Think of 'antifa' like 'woke' and 'DEI'. They create these terms and load them down with a bunch of connotations so people can be bigoted or fascists without having to confront that fact. There is no antifa.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] fubo@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

A lot of folks in Ireland have an Aunt Aoife.

[–] Mudman@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago

ElonGivingHisHeart.gif