this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2026
965 points (99.6% liked)

politics

29505 readers
2414 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 183 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

“Lightweight Jamie Raskin is a stupid person’s idea of a smart person,” said White House spokesperson Davis Ingle.

Trump is a poor white trash person's idea of a rich person.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Judging by how much the billionaires back him, I don't think that's true. The idea that billionaires are anything other than scammers and abusers like Trump is pretty obviously false. He just doesn't mask it.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 1 week ago

He's a useful idiot. Back in the 90s when he was doing fast food commercials, he lost massive amounts of money. The appearance of bring a billionaire helped him become a billionaire again. The dude's a grifter and a puppet.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No he's right. Trump before becoming president likely wasn't a billionaire. Trump is gold leaf trash amongst his peers, he's the bullshitter his peers play golf with to make fun of. He's the stupid face for the real Billionaires with tens and hundreds of billions. A Tool of no pedigree, his grandpa dodged the draft and made it opening a whore house.

The billionaires don't see him as one of them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 12 points 1 week ago

Billionaires back whoever they think can get them the most money. It really isn't any deeper than that.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are they just now catching onto and parroting memes from his first term? Lemmy needs a "the right can't meme" comm if there isn't one already.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Yeah, pretty big "2016 called and wants their Trump meme back" energy from this one.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 122 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

I was about to complain yet again "that's not how it works", but then I looked up the text again and this is explicitly allowed. Congress can set up a commission that basically takes the place of the Cabinet for 25th Amendment purposes. So now all this talk of the 25th amendment makes a bit more sense to me.

They still need a 2/3 margin in both houses even after the commission makes their determination, because the idiot is guaranteed to contest it. But maybe there is some truth to the idea that Republicans won't vote to impeach but would vote to declare him incompetent, based on his dumb tweets

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 52 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I think the chances that republicans will admit their guy is incompetent is close to 0. They will rather lock him up in the white house basement for 2 years.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe the dementia will progress far enough that he’ll forget he needs to send in a letter

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] artyom@piefed.social 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If I were a Republican I'd be arguing that there's no way Americans didn't already know he was incompetent when voting for him.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 86 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Oh great another 2 year circus side show.

A commission to assess?

Ffs.

Nuke us from space.

[–] jestho@lemmy.zip 31 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Your request for "nuke us from space" has been filed. It may take up to 15-20 years before you get a reply.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 69 points 1 week ago
[–] atropa@piefed.social 48 points 1 week ago

Release the epstein files

[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (37 children)

Has anyone noticed that the "both sides are the same so don't bother voting" crowd have tripled efforts since we neared another important election time frame, funny how that happens.

Especially pitching that in the face of Hungary's recent transition.

load more comments (37 replies)
[–] end_stage_ligma@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Today@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (9 children)

His craziness needs to stay in until December.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 22 points 1 week ago

Man, woman, felon, camera.

[–] TheVoiceOfRaison@thelemmy.club 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

His mental fitness is being assessed constantly. They just don't care about his decline. Putin will have him as long as he think he can serve his purpose as being a useful idiot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Congress has the power to create a commission to exercise the power to remove a mentally unfit president from office. The biggest worry is that this would inevitably be politicized. I say, let it happen! Let it be political. Let's have an openly political "mental health commission" that will rule that being a member of the opposite political party is a mental illness. Hell, let it become a formality. It will simply be expected that the president will be removed from office after a change in Congressional control. Whenever a change in control of Congress happens, the new Congressional leadership will stuff it with political ideologues. And they'll inevitably rule a president of the opposing party to be mentally unfit. Eventually it just becomes a formality, no one even considers it unusual. We just expect the presidency to be able to flip every two years. And we giggle that it has to be done by formally declaring the previous guy to be crazy. I think this would be a good idea.

Why? Because this would effectively transform the US into a Parliamentary democracy. A simple majority in both houses of Congress would be enough to install a new president. They effectively become a Prime Minister at that point. Parliamentary democracies have proven much more resilient to strong-man dictatorial takeover. It's not as perfect a solution as amending the constitution to formally remove the office of president entirely, but it would be a decent hack to do something similar. And going to a Parliamentary system isn't a magic cure-all, but it does have quite a bit of merit. As a plus, we would have the bonus of being "that nation that regularly declares its former leaders legally crazy." And you know what? I think that works well with America's energy.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Janx@piefed.social 17 points 1 week ago

That's basically saying "No u".

Gross
Old
Projection

Seriously, people have (rightly) been saying this about Trump for decades!

[–] FaygoRedPop@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"We finally got him!" - The same people saying this 10 years ago.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Surely the Mueller report will save us

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Does the 25th also work to remove Schumer and Jeffries from office?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I knew the dems would form a committee eventually. It's only a matter of time now. /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Jesus Christ just go for impeachment. If you can 25th, you can impeach. What a waste of time.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Yuccagnocchiyaki@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"We are going to file a request to create a vote in order to create a commission, that can create a petition to allow us to file the article to vote on whether or not we can impeach the seditious, blackmailed. child raping, human trafficker that sold out our country".

The rules are pretty hilarious at this point.

They REALLY WANT HIM GONE GUYS

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jeffep@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Hilarious how everyone here complains they take the (slow) bureaucratic route.

This is a political party and that's how they can act.

If you want fast results, take it to the streets. Kicking him out outside of bureaucratic procedures is everyone's responsibility, not specifically the elected parties

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

I haven’t seen this on Reddit yet. It’s interesting to compare what’s posted on lemmy and reddid.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Another performative stunt. Dead on arrival and everyone knows it.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ragnar_ok@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

he's going to ace it! it'll be the best 25th amendment commission they've ever seen! Maybe even the most they've ever seen, who knows? lots of people were saying "wow you aced it mr president"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

He's already told you he's taken mental tests and done well, like Mensa level well, like they thought he cheated but he didn't well. What more could you possibly want and how the fuck do you think you are going to get it? A move like this doesn't work when you don't have the cards, and you don't have the cards dems.

load more comments
view more: next ›