this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
277 points (100.0% liked)

Memes of Production

1500 readers
1103 users here now

Seize the Memes of Production

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

This won't end with wage increases

This will end in investment in metal detectors and pay downs and shit like that to ensure employees won't be able to come in with lighters anymore

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 2 points 1 hour ago

Do it enough times and it will end with change.

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

I approve of this message! 👍

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 138 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

First we had Luigi.

Now we have Warehouse Luigi, a Waluigi, if you will.

[–] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 20 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 15 minutes ago) (1 children)

Whole new meaning to NSFW. Never Safe From Waluigi!

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 hours ago

Now Set Fire, Waaahh!

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 97 points 1 day ago (6 children)

New union tactic: start openly organizing, and threaten to burn the building down if they try to union bust

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 11 hours ago

Unfortunately both them (and us) forgot that this is the kind of thing their new deal tried to prevent. We didn't get 8 hour days and 5 day weeks because we asked nicely and they felt generous. We got it because workers back then burnt down shit and the bosses were at a reasonable fear they were gonna get got.

We need to put the fear back into the rich again if we need to see real change.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 22 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

That's not a new union tactic, that's an old school union tactic. Organisation and unions started with riots and breaking shit.

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 5 points 3 hours ago

Really heartwarming to see us go back to our roots. I honestly thought the system had managed to breed it out of us.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 91 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wait, that's just the old tactics

[–] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 34 points 20 hours ago

The state wanted to remove the rules. They didn't know the rules were there to keep them safe from us.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 14 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Once we are done we can go to the executives' homes too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 16 points 20 hours ago

Funny enough even in fox news apparently people are calling it a fire insurance scam.

[–] fiat_lux@lemmy.world 37 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I'm glad nobody was hurt, he waited until after midnight to set it. But maybe someone needs to call the fire marshals on the Kimberly Clark warehouses. I can hear a fire alarm at the end, and I'm no fire safety engineer, but it doesn't look like there are signs of sprinklers or other fire suppression systems?

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 72 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Don't have the full article but there was fire suppression. Then the fire team showed up, evacuated the building, and, at the behest of the company, shut off the system to prevent further damage to the rest of the products as the fire team was handling the original fire.

Then the dude went around and started burning other pallets in different parts of the warehouse.

Waluigi here had a plan and executed it.

Should have paid them enough to live.

[–] fiat_lux@lemmy.world 53 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Oh, that's very interesting. If that's true, someone should tell Kimberly-Clark's insurers that they deliberately shut off fire suppression during a fire. Maybe this will actually cost them a few dollars?

[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 2 points 1 hour ago

It's standard practice to shut down a fire suppression system after the fire is extinguished: the water will cause more damage than the fire did if you don't. The owner is responsible for having someone on "fire watch" until the activated sprinkler heads are replaced and the system is put back into service -- which needs to be done by someone qualified to do so.

It sounds like they did everything "right" in that regard, they just didn't realize the guy starting fires was still there.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 22 hours ago

lol I didn't even think of this, hilarious

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 87 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

Who would win?

One disgruntled boi with a lighter

or

A billion dollar company

Where's my stapler?

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

One? There are millions of us for every single one of them.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

I… uh… unfortunately, I’m gonna go with the billion dollar company.

Insurance will cover most of the damage, the dude will end up in prison, and at most the worst that the company will suffer is higher premiums.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago

The higher premiums will cost the company almost as much as the arson. Insurance just spreads out financial risk over time; it's still a net loss for the insured.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 16 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

I am hoping insurance will do all it can to deny and even then charge more moving forward.

Alternatively, the company heads will get scared knowing their house is flammable too.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 5 points 17 hours ago

Never noticed the dead plant before 😚👌

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] normanwall@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (24 children)
[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 11 hours ago

“## Please allow ads on our site”

No, I don’t think I will

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

[someone] was charged by federal authorities with arson of a building used in interstate and foreign commerce

So because they sell wares in other states, it's a felony? Not sure I agree with that.

[–] brynden_rivers_esq@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

I expect it’s a felony because it’s arson. It’s federal because they sell wares in other states.

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›