this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
139 points (98.6% liked)

politics

30031 readers
2575 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Melania Trump, the first lady, told reporters on Thursday that she “never had a relationship” with the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell.

It was unclear which specific accusations spurred the first lady to respond publicly. She delivered her scripted remarks at a podium in the same room Donald Trump used to address the nation on the war in Iran last week.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ickplant@lemmy.world 85 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

There's more photos of her and Epstein than there are of Trump and Epstein.

[–] agingelderly@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, these didn't happen, the Epstein trafficed expornstar said so

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago

It is possible she was pimped out through one of the other Epstein-adjacent "agencies."

[–] Karmanopoly@lemmy.world 68 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago

Not sure but the pose leaning away looks right

[–] rimu@piefed.social 59 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Pretty weird to do this out of the blue. Feels like she's trying to frontfoot something big that's about to come out.

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Perhaps her bill of sale from JE to Donnie?

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

She's just a guilty monster trying to look innocent.

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 47 points 2 months ago

Yea, and your husband didn't fuck kids. Get real.

[–] troglodytis@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So.... She fucked him. Got it

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Baron Epstein for real for real?

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, she fucked kids most likely.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

Or held a kid down while Trump raped the kid.

[–] starik@lemmy.zip 35 points 2 months ago
[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago

You lying cunt!

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 27 points 2 months ago

Hopefully this house of cards falls and everything gets exposed. Fuck the Epstein class.

[–] theOneTrueSpoon@feddit.uk 26 points 2 months ago
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago
[–] Janx@piefed.social 23 points 2 months ago
[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They’re trying to rewrite history in realtime. We can’t let it happen.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

They’re trying to rewrite history in realtime.

I just read this from CNN:

President Trump has also denied any wrongdoing related to Epstein and has said he cut off ties with him in the early 2000s before his criminal conduct came to light. There is no evidence of wrongdoing by either of the Trumps.

And yet, the Epstein files includes stuff like "Unnamed victim alleges Trump raped her". Testimony is evidence. How can CNN claim there is "no evidence"?

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 months ago

Their owners want them to deny there's evidence, so that's what they do.

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

It's like MAGA ELITES are testing the MAGA VOTERS to see what % of them will buy a lie when that same person has already seen evidence that it is, in fact, a lie.

Probably a convenient thing for them to know for their future machinations.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Now do under oath

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

One of the few humans to have reached the Uncanny Valley. Future generations will never believe that she wasn’t some AI slop avatar.

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

Legitimately the most hopeful I've been in a while.