this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2026
542 points (98.4% liked)

politics

29282 readers
2361 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 23 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

What? Pretty sure Afghanistan was lost too?? Or are we using strategic ambiguity in new ways?

[–] Heikki2@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

The way I interpret this is single-handedly lost the war. Afghanistan was over 4 presidents (Bush, Obama, Trump, and Biden). The sloppy withdrawal by Biden was die to no planning and a treaty signed by Trump to do so by 2/29/2020.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Trump is the one who unconditionally surrendered Afghanistan. It's on him.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago

But still, not winning against Stone Age goat herders for 4 presidents... I don't know man, what was the plan? Bomb the desert again?

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

If that's the case, then Nixon didn't single handily lose the Vietnam War either.

But let's be real. The Democrat president who inherits this war in 2028 will be the one blamed for loosing it.

[–] BouteilleBrune@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

The sloppy withdrawal by Biden was a treaty signed by Trump to do so by 2/29/2020.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KulunkelBoom@lemmus.org 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It's not that he lost... it's not that he started it because putin told him to... it's not even that his moron running the "war department" is an alcohol addled butt sucking asshole...

It's because of all the goddam taxpayer money he threw DOWN THE FUCKING COMMODE on the death merchants. What? Did Raytheon need to clear out some old inventory?

[–] tacoplease@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

Putin didn't get him to start, it was Bibi.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (12 children)

You yanks REALLY need to lose this one. Your noses need to be rubbed in it. You need to feel the SHIT you put the rest of us though. And you need to get seriously angry at the Israelis and rub THEIR noses in it. You need a big enough shock to CHANGE.

(Like I know most of the people on Lemmy are not Republican idiots. I'm obviously not talking about you personally, but about the «general public opinion» in the US, especially the Republican idiots.)

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

I'm sadly forced to work alongside some republican asshats, and let me tell you, they're fucking ecstatic about how the usa military is kicking Iran's ass. Reality has no bearing on them.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

In America, we punish the incumbents. BoTh PaRtIeS have told their own constituents to fuck off; membership of registered voters is at 30% each. Independents are now 40% of voters.

Whoever wins the election tells the people who elected them to fuck off; so, we vote them out. That's it. The new election winner then tells the people who elected them to fuck off, and so on.

Examples: Biden runs with minimum wage increase as platform, wins, then tells everybody to fuck off.

Trump then runs with "no war" as platform; wins, goes to war and tells his voters to fuck off.

He will be replaced by a Democrat, who will then also tell their voters to fuck off.

Repeat ad nauseam. Neither party does what they are elected to do and are then punished, to be replaced by the other party that will refuse to do what they were elected to do.

We can't vote ourselves out of this, unfortunately.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

He will be replaced by a Democrat, who will then also tell their voters to fuck off.

The real political innovation here is that the Democratic party is telling its voters to fuck off before the next election.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

They don't have anything to loose. Another Republican president? Great! They can sit on their asses for four more years writing angry tweets about how offended they are while telling voters to fuck off. Democrats win? Even better! Sit on their asses while insider trading and taking billionaire tributes while telling voters to fuck off. What a great system we have.

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 1 points 18 hours ago

I agree with the incumbent part, but exactly how was Biden able to pass minimum wage law but decided not to? It can't go in reconciliation and they didn't have the votes for it in the Senate.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 7 points 23 hours ago

They don't care. It's a video game to most Americans. That's what having oceans between you and the bombs does.

[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

The US committed a war crime on day one, and Israel has been on a war crime spree since Oct 7.... if this turns into a world war, it'll be that Mitchell and Webb skit.... "are we the baddies?"

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago

No one's done that since Nixon? Would you call Afghanistan a victory? Although that was also Trump.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Hows our "Project for a new American century" coming along? Seems it wasnt as easy as just writing down all the things we lusted after and grabbing them via pure hubris.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

7 wars and a movie... just missing the movie.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I'm sure they'll make a movie about how the war made them sad

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 hours ago

Maybe they needed the ratings for the final war/season to be higher for the movie.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

yes, inevitably casting "principled" god-fearing maga people as the real victims in all of this, who are always calm and dignified, and never ever wanted any violence, but the outcome was forced on them.... by muslim and woke democrat terrorists who were the real epstein pedophiles all along. We can have an AI write this movie in about 5 minutes. I bet Noah Wiley would agree to play Hegseth.

[–] FE80@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 1 points 19 hours ago

Yeah, they're still sending out a newsletter and doing decent articles on their webpage but they're low on fundraising.

[–] n7gifmdn@lemmy.ca 6 points 23 hours ago

Did AI write this article? It repeats itself a lot.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago

um what? america has only won 2 wars against a guerrilla force of their own terf in the last 100 years.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In Afghanistan, Trump unconditionally surrendered to the Taliban, but left Biden to complete the withdrawal. Before that, Iraq was either a loss or a stalemate, depending on what the poorly articulated objectives actually were.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The last time the US won was WW2.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The US "won" in WW2 because they managed to pick the winning team. There was a significant pro-nazi faction in the country at the time and it wasn't really until Japan attacked Pear Harbour that they really picked a side and went all-in on it. Before that, they were fine with selling stuff to Nazi Germany, and Japan for that matter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The allies won WW2. The US alone would have lost.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If we make that distinction then we're looking at Spanish American war as their last win.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Well... I guess they won the American Civil War.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Half of them lost it though, shall we call it a draw?

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The wars were won in both cases. Decisively.

Hearts and minds were not won, in either case. There is a good question whether the nationbuilding could even theoretically have succeeded, given how tribal and divided the countries were. IMO it was stupid to try in the first place, especially in Afghanistan.

[–] fishy@lemmy.today 2 points 23 hours ago

We keep entering conflicts with no clear objective because our leadership lies about our reasons for entering the conflict. In both cases we had no hard evidence they were even continuing development of nuclear weapons.

We defeated their military and occupied their countries, but winning implies completing an objective successfully. When we exited Afghanistan the Taliban instantly took control. They completed their objective, they won the war.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Every $10 increase in crude translates to roughly 24 cents per gallon at the pump. So we're looking at 25 to 45 cents per gallon — baked in, structural, not going away when the war ends, not going away when the headlines fade, not going away ever.

Can we stop with this narrative that this is somehow a bad thing?

The price of oil has been too low. calculate the cost if externalities, and the price should be close to infinity.

Just stop oil.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Food prices are still tied to fossil fuel prices. This will cause a lot of very real pain, among the poorest in the world.

So yes, we need to get to net zero carbon. But there has to be a more humane way than unplanned cold turkey.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago

It's only cold turkey now because we haven't done it in the last 50 years.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That time has passed. It was supposed to be a slow transition since 1970s.

Now the only option is to just stop now.

And most of the world's food is produced locally. For those few heavily industrialized countries that chose to centralize their food systems to be dependent on fossil fuels, they have enough wealth to give free food to their poor populations.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And most of the world’s food is produced locally.

...With imported nitrogen fertilizer made from fossil fuel. And with farm machines burning imported oil. And transported even to local market using imported fuel.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] axx@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

The number of trackers this site wants you to accept and load is insane. I know it's not that unusual these days, but fuck that, i'm not putting up with your clearly malicious interpretation of legitimate interest to see one article.

[–] hume_lemmy@lemmy.ca 205 points 2 days ago (17 children)

I think this article forgets how Trump effectively surrendered Afghanistan to the Taliban the last time around.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›