In contrast to not using a VPN, which subjects them to illegal surveillance already?
this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2026
270 points (98.9% liked)
Technology
83406 readers
3392 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Americans may be inadvertently waiving the privacy protections they’re entitled to under the law…
LOL what privacy protections? The NSA has proven time and time again that they don't give a single shit about the law, certainly now more than ever.
What do I trust more: Legal protections nobody cares to enforce and could be a multi year battle in court, or well verified strong cryptography.
It's not the cryptography you have to trust. It's the other end of the tunnel. A free VPN most probably sells your data. Nobody offers free services for actually free.
I don't use free VPNs
In a letter sent Thursday to Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, the lawmakers say that because VPNs obscure a user’s true location, and because intelligence agencies presume that communications of unknown origin are foreign, Americans may be inadvertently waiving the privacy protections they’re entitled to under the law.
Several federal agencies, including the FBI, the National Security Agency, and the Federal Trade Commission, have recommended that consumers use VPNs to protect their privacy. But following that advice may inadvertently cost Americans the very protections they’re seeking.
The letter was signed by members of the Democratic Party’s progressive flank: Senators Ron Wyden, Elizabeth Warren, Edward Markey, and Alex Padilla, along with Representatives Pramila Jayapal and Sara Jacobs.
There's a saying in Poland: "Robić kurwę z logiki" Which simultaneously can be translated as "To make a whore out of logic" Or "To turn the logic into a whore"
Oh nooo, we won't be protected by the law they can't be arsed to follow anyway? Whatever will I do when they surveil my encrypted VPN traffic?
Store now, decrypt later. Make sure your VPN is using quantum-safe encryption algorithms with perfect forward secrecy. They are storing ALL traffic that goes outside the country (probably domestic traffic too, realistically).
Don't you think that would take too much storage space?
They can probably use heuristics to keep the 0.1% most interesting traffic (eg traffic that flows towards servers that isn’t too large, that’d catch everything you send to your bank without breaking the budget to store)
I don't give a shit.
what in the anti-VPN fearmongering is this bullshit?
So, I am a remote worker in Healthcare. Obviously, I need to use a VPN to connect to work to ensure that communication is secure. But because I have a job that requires secure access, I am a suspected domestic terrorist?
No, because there are different types of vpn connectivity.
A point to point vpn is what employees use to connect to the office. The intention is to encrypt the connection so a 3rd party can’t access ithe data going through it. The FBI/NSA won’t care about this type of vpn because your work knows who you are and logs all traffic generated by you which could be subpoenaed by the government.
Connecting to a vpn server in another country to then access the internet hides your original ip address, gets around geo-location blocks and the traffic is typically not logged by the vpn provider. This is the type of vpn governments don’t like.
I think it's somewhat naive to assume anything isn't being spied on by the NSA. They don't have a history of being picky.
Of course. I’m sure they are making use of plenty of bugs found in firewall software to access and monitor business traffic, but they can subpoena those logs at any time. It’s the private vpn clients where logs aren’t kept that they are most concerned about, hence why I was outlining the difference.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I don't get it.
Why should a Russian spy have to tell Americans anything?
lol please tell me more. I've heard kooks like you are roaming around unmedicated?
They have been surveiling us for years. They just to maximize what they can collect.
They've already collected your modal verb!
I've been pegged as one who serially modals online.
I connected to my VPN so I can see a video of that and now I'm on 7 government watchlists
Correct, and the FBI inadvertently admitted it publicly by releasing video in the Guthrie abduction case that shouldn't exist.
Every device with a wireless connection and a GPS, camera, or microphone is surveilling you.
Time to spread the free word of Tor to everyone.
but i2p
I wasn't crazy about i2p. I really loved Freenet and Zeronet
Is it safe enough to use vpns based out of the US? I'm using nord which is non us.
Depends what you mean by "safe enough". Every country on the planet can subpoena your VPN for traffic data. That's why that data needs to be encrypted, regardless of what company.
Nord is owned by Tesonet, a data mining company which also owns SurfShark.
And Private Internet Access and ExpressVPN are owned by Kape, an Israeli firm.
ProtonVPN is owned by Proton, in Switzerland.
Mullvad is based in Sweden and is the main interest of its seemingly decent, also Swedish, parent company
Fan of Mullvad but just be aware its not what you want if you're using a VPN for torrenting. They had to remove their port forwarding feature due to some bad actors ruining it for the rest of us.
What happens if you are torrenting via Mullvad?
they don't allow port forwarding which nerfs the effectiveness of seeding, seeding is still possible, just not as effective.
TBH modern torrent works well even if majority of users don't have ports forwarded
You'll only be able to connect to certain peers that do have port forwarding setup.
Only if you disable uTP protocol. Or if you have an ancient client that doesn't support it
If a friend was interested in that, what should I tell them to use instead? Asking for a friend, obviously.
I switched to AirVPN when Mullvad made the change. I think Proton, PIA, and Windscribe have it too.
Thanks. Sounds good
CyberGhost I believe is also owned by Kape or a subsidiary.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Those are the ones that would cause them to surveil you.
The issue isn't necessarily "the government will target you for using a VPN;" the issue is "if your IP makes you look like you're outside the US because that's where your traffic exits the VPN, the laws against domestic spying won't protect you properly because you'll look like a foreigner."
Frankly, the headline is heavily spinning it to be anti-VPN fearmongering.
Yeah I reacted way too quickly. Then I realized half of X bot traffic spoofs everywhere. They're intentionally doing a shakeup of everything and this one got under my skin cause I'm a daily user.
But before this was that outside US router ban that was pretty real. The DJI ban. So these types of news cascade and its worrisome.
No. They will see that you’re using a vpn.
They might decide to record your traffic and save it until it can be decrypted.
Is it safe enough to use vpns based out of the US?
yes, just be aware that the gov could require the company to log you without letting you know, even if they have a no log setup. For the everyday person this is a non-issue, but if you are doing shadey stuff or have ties that may make someone super interested in your activities, you may wanna choose elsewhere.
The everyday person has political views that can be categorized as extremist. Freedom is more costly.
load more comments
(3 replies)
view more: next ›