this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2026
295 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

83406 readers
3085 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

...because VPNs obscure a user’s true location, and because intelligence agencies presume that communications of unknown origin are foreign, Americans may be inadvertently waiving the privacy protections they’re entitled to under the law...

...VPNs might protect you against garden-variety criminals, but the intentional commingling of origin/destination points by VPNs could turn purely domestic communications into “foreign” communications the NSA can legally intercept (and the FBI, somewhat less-legally can dip into at will)...

Certainly the NSA isn’t concerned about “incidental collection.” It’s never been too concerned about its consistent “incidental” collection of US persons’ communications and data in the past and this isn’t going to budge the needle, especially since it means the NSA would have to do more work to filter out domestic communications and the FBI would be less than thrilled with any efforts made to deny it access to communications it doesn’t have the legal right to obtain on its own.

Since the government won’t do this, it’s up to the general public, starting with everyone sharing the contents of this letter with others. VPNs can still offer considerable security benefits. But everyone needs to know that domestic surveillance is one of the possible side effects of utilizing this tech.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rossman@lemmy.zip 12 points 20 hours ago (6 children)

Is it safe enough to use vpns based out of the US? I'm using nord which is non us.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 3 points 8 hours ago

Depends what you mean by "safe enough". Every country on the planet can subpoena your VPN for traffic data. That's why that data needs to be encrypted, regardless of what company.

[–] obvs@lemmy.world 49 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (3 children)

Nord is owned by Tesonet, a data mining company which also owns SurfShark.

And Private Internet Access and ExpressVPN are owned by Kape, an Israeli firm.

ProtonVPN is owned by Proton, in Switzerland.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 39 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Mullvad is based in Sweden and is the main interest of its seemingly decent, also Swedish, parent company

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 21 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Fan of Mullvad but just be aware its not what you want if you're using a VPN for torrenting. They had to remove their port forwarding feature due to some bad actors ruining it for the rest of us.

[–] leoj@piefed.zip 8 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

What happens if you are torrenting via Mullvad?

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 13 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

they don't allow port forwarding which nerfs the effectiveness of seeding, seeding is still possible, just not as effective.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

TBH modern torrent works well even if majority of users don't have ports forwarded

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

You'll only be able to connect to certain peers that do have port forwarding setup.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Only if you disable uTP protocol. Or if you have an ancient client that doesn't support it

[–] leoj@piefed.zip 1 points 7 minutes ago

Shit I rarely make it above 1:1 even if I seed 24/7 for a while, I wonder if I need to work on my settings.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

If a friend was interested in that, what should I tell them to use instead? Asking for a friend, obviously.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I switched to AirVPN when Mullvad made the change. I think Proton, PIA, and Windscribe have it too.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 2 points 15 hours ago

Thanks. Sounds good

[–] leoj@piefed.zip 9 points 17 hours ago

CyberGhost I believe is also owned by Kape or a subsidiary.

[–] rossman@lemmy.zip 5 points 19 hours ago

Thanks for the extra digging, no true privacy but at least there's some transparency with the vpns.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Those are the ones that would cause them to surveil you.

The issue isn't necessarily "the government will target you for using a VPN;" the issue is "if your IP makes you look like you're outside the US because that's where your traffic exits the VPN, the laws against domestic spying won't protect you properly because you'll look like a foreigner."

Frankly, the headline is heavily spinning it to be anti-VPN fearmongering.

[–] rossman@lemmy.zip 6 points 16 hours ago

Yeah I reacted way too quickly. Then I realized half of X bot traffic spoofs everywhere. They're intentionally doing a shakeup of everything and this one got under my skin cause I'm a daily user.

But before this was that outside US router ban that was pretty real. The DJI ban. So these types of news cascade and its worrisome.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago

No. They will see that you’re using a vpn.

They might decide to record your traffic and save it until it can be decrypted.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Is it safe enough to use vpns based out of the US?

yes, just be aware that the gov could require the company to log you without letting you know, even if they have a no log setup. For the everyday person this is a non-issue, but if you are doing shadey stuff or have ties that may make someone super interested in your activities, you may wanna choose elsewhere.

[–] rossman@lemmy.zip 7 points 16 hours ago

The everyday person has political views that can be categorized as extremist. Freedom is more costly.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

In theory, I think all VPN usage is grounds to get you put on a list, but Nord is considered a relatively "normie" company by privacy aficionados. Everybody and their mother has seen an ad for it by this point. (The privacy aficionados will probably tell you it's not good enough, but that's a can of worms I won't get into right now.)

[–] rossman@lemmy.zip 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Makes sense I should probably reframe it as is nord not going to sell their users out without a fight.

Only true privacy is like the tails stuff and some complicated routing stuff all the self hosting guys here probably know about.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 14 points 18 hours ago

AFAIK the one company that has been battle-tested is Mullvad, everything else requires (more) crossing your fingers.

Nord has subpar standards when it comes to logging now, and if that's in line with recent Proton behavior, you might that interpret that as a potential willingness to cave to the US with minimal pushback