this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
106 points (99.1% liked)

Selfhosted

58212 readers
484 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Like soup-to-nuts. I know I need to document what I'm doing and I've started several times, but then I never go back and make updates. I don't know if it's just the ADHD or if I'm just going about it or thinking about it in the wrong way.

So I'm curious about:

  • what you use for your documentation
  • how you organize it
  • what information you include
  • how you work documentation into your changes/tinkering flow

Edit: Dang, folks! You all have given me a lot to read through, think about, and explore. Thank you!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xcjs@programming.dev 1 points 6 hours ago

Ansible.

Infrastructure as code is the best documentation.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

ADHD: functional notes in abbreviated version on fat strips of painter's tape on server case or shelf. Passwords go on page dedicated to that server or service in a little black notebook, then eventually in a password manager.

Readme file if my brain lets me, usually 3 months later after hyperfocus on troubleshooting.

[–] BruisedMoose@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

Honestly, the tape idea is one of the most practical ones in the thread!

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 128 points 3 days ago (2 children)

That's the neat part, I don't.

[–] undefinedTruth@lemmy.zip 40 points 3 days ago (3 children)

"I don't need to, I have it stored all in my head."

Famous last words.

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

It's not like anyone needs to support it when I'm gone.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago

"I can remember that" is my cue to write it down, because I won't.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Buck@jlai.lu 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The theory is I use Docmost. The reality is I don’t, and I hope my backups are solid.

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I have an obsidian document where I write changes I want to do in the future that I never look at; does that count?

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

I just found my todo list and half of it is irrelevant and half of it is done.

I even had a work todo list for my old job lol.

[–] Buck@jlai.lu 3 points 3 days ago

Ouh! I have a checklist of things I need to add/update too, that I never check. Maybe we could mutualize! ;)

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 59 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I just think I do that, but absolutely don't.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

write-only memory.

no read, only write!

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

Yeah I also use config-as-code along with wiki but I used to remember things 10 years ago when the setup was simpler and the brain was newer. 😅

[–] Scrath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I read the title and this was literally the first thing that popped in my head

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

I'm here to serve.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago
[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 47 points 3 days ago (4 children)

The fun thing about infrastructure as code is that the terraform, ansible and k8s manifests are documentation.

I only really need to document some bootstrap things in case of emergency and maybe some "architectural" things. I use joplin for that (and many other things).

[–] AliasVortex@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

That's the direction I'm moving my lab in. Plus a bit of supplemental markdown to keep track of which guides I'm referencing (and which parts can be ignored because I baked it into the terrafom). It's really nice to know that as long as I tweak the terraform for changes, I don't have to worry about forgetting what I changed.

[–] BruisedMoose@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Without really knowing much about it, I just always figured it was overkill for me. Plus I don't know that I'd even consider myself much more of a beginner with Docker. But you all are making me consider looking into it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yep. It feels good knowing I can take a few hundred KB of text files and rebuild my whole system.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] synapse1278@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago
  • what you use for your documentation

Markdown files

  • how you organize it

What ?

  • what information you include

The commands that worked and the stuff that didn't work and the links to the source of information

  • how you work documentation into your changes

I write as I go. I keep it as part of a git repository when relevant

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

The moment you think you might possibly need documentation is the moment you should seriously consider using Ansible or similar to orchestra things. Sure, it's annoying for a single server, but it is the best form of documentation there is.

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

I just create a README.md file wherever I setup services with docker compose which keeps top level docs so I know how and why certain things work.

Other than that, if comments are supported inside configuration files, also document stuff in there too.

That's been good enough for me.

[–] uenticx@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)
[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago

README_I_AAM_VERY_IMPORTANT.md

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 8 points 3 days ago

When I set something up I write all the steps I'm doing in obsidian as I do it. The pages get tagged so they're searchable in the future.

[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

draw.io in my nextcloud

network diagram on nextcloud

And leantime to keep track of what I want to do with notes and such

leantime kanban screenshot

And a mess of notes in Joplin.

[–] Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu 11 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Dokuwiki

https://wiki.gardiol.org/

For me for future memory and for others who might need it

[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

https://wiki.gardiol.org/

BTW, this gent's wiki is worth a bookmark. Stumbled on it before I knew the originator.

[–] Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu 3 points 3 days ago

Thanks you, it means a lot. Just to be clear for whomever didn't go there: there is zero monetization, no ads, no profiling.

[–] eli@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Using Mediawiki here.

I have obsidian and tried using it, but my personal workflow for my homelab just doesn't...work with it? Idk, it's just easier to throw it into a private wiki.

I still use obsidian but for personal life stuff.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago
  • I use Obsidian
  • Usually, what I do is write the documentation as I am engaged with the project at hand. Then clean everything up, and transfer to Obsidian.
  • I include everything. I don't leave anything for my mind to wonder about. If I didn't write it down, it didn't happen.
  • Date any addenda or changes (4-2-26: Firewall rules review)
[–] death916@piefed.death916.xyz 9 points 3 days ago

I used to try and do it all in obsidian but I'd forget a lot. Now I use nix and it's all done for me basically

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why do you have to be like that? Drop the innocent questions and just come right out and call me a piece of shit directly.

[–] BruisedMoose@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago

Trust me, this is all about me being incompetent.

[–] mrh@mander.xyz 5 points 3 days ago
[–] Scrath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago

I have a bare minimum of documentation as markdown files which I take care to keep in an accessible lovation, aka not on my server.

If my server does ever go down, I might really want to access the (admittedly limited) documentation for it

Mostly just quick notes in Obsidian, if I do anything complex or 'unusual' to set something up I'll save the history that I ran.

[–] Mobile@leminal.space 3 points 3 days ago

Man I'm as basic as it comes. I have a .txt file that I update with today's date and write what I'm working on. I try to write as much as needed on what I'm working on. I write commands down and save links to reading material.

It's not the best but it's better than nothing.

[–] tobz619@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

NixOS because it's declarative kind of does it all for me.

The .nix files serve as their own documentation and if I need to do anything outside them I add a comment to the .nix file.

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

At work, since I’m the sole IT, I’ve been putting everything into MkDocs and it’s been working out great for the team. Only complaint is that I can’t seem to figure out how to update anything without just relaunching the Docker container every time. They mention that you can live reload, but not how.

I'm just rewriting everything in Ansible and I think is worth the effort, it's self-documented and as an added bonus I won't have to keep backups of the whole VMs, just the ZFS pool with the data/databases.

[–] VexLogic@feddit.online 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm actually in the middle of rebuilding my entire setup right now and one of my major goals is to actually document my processes this time.

I use Obsidian which is a Markdown editor and I have a couple plugins alongside that for QoL stuff and extra features.

I document processes, problems and fixes I encounter, list of active services alongside where/how to access them, and plans for future additions/changes.

As far as working documentation into your flow, realistically that is just a matter of discipline. It is explicitly up to you to stay on top of documentation.

Hope that helps, and good luck with your endeavor! 😁

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] foster@lemmy.hangdaan.com 4 points 3 days ago

Use declarative systems and software, where the configurations files themselves are the documentation. For example, I use Guix and Podman. The entire OS is described in a Scheme file and all the services are described in a YAML file. I just need those two files to get an overview of the entire setup.

[–] hamsda@feddit.org 3 points 3 days ago

It depends on what it is. I do not have a singular documentation-platform or wiki for those things. I'm more of the keep the docs where the code is guy. I also try to keep complexity to a minimum.

All my linux server setups are done with ansible. ansible itself is pretty self-documenting, as you more or less declare the desired outcome in YAML form and ansible does the rest. This way, I do not need to remember it, but it's easier to understand when looking it up again.

Most of my projects have a git repository, so most of what I need to know or do is documented

  • in a README.md
  • as pipeline-instructions inside .gitlab-ci.yml

This way, I was able to reduce complexity and unify my homelab projects.

My current homelab-state is:

  • most projects are now docker-based
  • most projects have a GitLab CI for automated updating to newer versions
  • the CI itself is a project and all my CI-docker-based deploys use this unified pipeline-project
  • most projects can be tested locally before rolling out new versions to my VMs
  • some projects have a production and a staging server to test
  • those which cannot be dockerized or turned into a CI are tools and don't need that (e.g. ansible playbooks or my GitLab CI)

On what to include, I always try to think: Will I still be able to understand this without documentation if I forget about the project for 6 months and need to make a change then? If you can't be sure, put it in writing.

If it's just a small thing regarding not the project itself or the functionality or setup itself but rather something like I had to use this strange code-block here because of XXX, I'll just put a comment next to the code-line or code-block in question. These comments mostly also include a link to a bug-report if I found one, so i can later check and see if it's been fixed already.

[–] magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago

I'm surprised no one else has answered mediawiki. Love my mediawiki instance.

[–] AMillionMonkeys@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I use Obsidian with a folder for hardware and a folder for software, then an entry for each device or service. I've been pretty good about maintaining cross-links.
I kind of wish I used Docker Compose more, but I haven't run into a situation where it's been a problem yet.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Short: don't do anything manually, throw it into a ansible playbook. Save it somewhere.

load more comments
view more: next ›