this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2026
307 points (99.0% liked)

politics

29178 readers
2943 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago

Let's stop enabling him with headlines. He didn't "sign an executive order limiting mail-in voting," because executive orders can't legally do that. He attempted to limit mail-in voting with an executive order. Stop granting the premise. If it works, it won't be because of an EO, it'll be because the USPS broke the law. Trump's power requires others to treat it as absolute. We've got to stop agreeing to do so.

[–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 19 points 22 hours ago

Remember everyone, since voting won't magically fix everything that means it's worthless! That's why Republicans are trying so hard to suppress voters. For.... Reasons! /S

[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 0 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

lol. dumpy don't give a fuck about laws and what's right. He does whatever he wants to further his own interests. ~~He also wasn't allowed to run as president after getting a shitload of felony convictions, but he still did.~~ Daddy dumpy don't care.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

He also wasn’t allowed to run as president after getting a shitload of felony convictions

There is no legal barrier that prevents a felon from running for President.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 2 points 5 hours ago

What you say is completely true. But there is actually another law which should have prevented Trump from running in 2024.

Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, known as the disqualification clause, bars anyone from holding federal or state office—including the presidency—if they previously took an oath to support the U.S. Constitution and then engaged in insurrection, rebellion, or gave aid or comfort to enemies of the U.S..

Jan 6 2020 was an insurrection by Trump.

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

oh wow. Apparently you're right. I always thought felons could not run for pres. but still, he doesn't care about laws.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I believe the law prohibits felons from holding public office , except for the positions of potus and vpotus as the constitution governs those

This was obviously not what was intended,.as it was assumed that a felon, whole able to run, would never be voted in. How little the founding fathers knew...

[–] Cherries@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago

I too wish that laws still mattered. Thankfully, they still matter a little bit, so there's still a chance for us to turn things around.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What was that about states rights again?

[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Unconstitutional

[–] meme_historian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The notion that any aspect of a presidential election can be regulated through executive orders by the current sitting president would be laughed out of the room in any halfway functional democracy.

Might as well do away with the charade and call them royal decrees

[–] kingofthezyx@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago

Trump signs executive order declaring Republicans win every open race in the country - Nov 3rd headline this year

[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Republicans will lose so thoroughly in November that any attempt at casting doubt on the results of elections will be laughable, no matter the states propensity to vote Republican. We've already seen areas that went to tRump in 2024 by, like 23pts, go to Democrat candidates by a similar margin. That's a -40pt swing in some tRump country elections. That's not poling. Those are special election results.

I think the war he started is only going to intensify the swing by then. At least that's the hope-ium I'm snorting off the toilet seat of this current timeline. In actuality, November will be the last hope for this dying republic and how far gone 1/3 of the population appears to be.

All I know is every reporter that can put questions to tRump need to relentlessly call him out for his mail-in voting, his family's mail-in voting, and reduce any attempt by Faux 'News' to clip positive soundbites, impossible. Drive down into the states rights thought and hit back at Republican voters and candidates with their own arguments. Not to shame or berate them on their past voting choices, but to side with them against any Republican betraying the principles they claim to espouse.

If we successfully vote in a super majority, we must relentlessly canvass communities and hound our reps to demand a change to the whole first-past-the-post method of voting. A lot of our political frustrations can be abated locally, all the way up to national, with this change! If they refuse to support it in any capacity, run progressive candidates to challenge these measured-opposition Democrats and forcefully remove the do-nothing Schumer's of this rotted party/system. No more capitulation to a party. No more hemming and hawing after they're sworn in. Nothing else can be fixed until we replace the system that's used to pick our elected leaders and we have given them ample opportunities to save this country and the party.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You know, I've heard this twice before, and I'm REALLY hoping you're right about this

[–] Shnog@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Unfortunately I still think there is still too much Dem infighting. I expect a big painful loss for Dems this, and maybe even the next, election cycle. Perhaps after that there will be enough focused anger to unseat a Republican president.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 142 points 1 day ago (11 children)

The actual details are bonkers

According to the Daily Caller, the executive order would require the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security to compile a list of verified U.S. citizens in each state who are eligible to vote. DHS would undertake the effort with the Social Security Administration, the Daily Caller wrote, citing a White House fact sheet.

The U.S. Postal Service would then be required under the order to only send mail-in ballots to voters who appear on the list, according to the Daily Caller. Election authorities in each state typically send out mail ballots to voters, not the Postal Service.

Aside from being blatantly illegal, I bet if you dig into this you will find that the contracts have been given to all of Musk's friends, using all the SSA data they stole

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago

Oops a "technical glitch" accidentally removed all Democrats. Can't redo the election though, sorry. We'll do better Next Time™©®

[–] bluemellophone@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

“Get absolutely fucked”

-the good people of Oregon

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 102 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Bitch, YOU just voted by mail!

[–] riskable@programming.dev 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To be fair, Trump voting at all is super sketchy.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 day ago (10 children)

He’s a felon, but they allow felons to vote in Florida.

[–] mr_robot2938@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Incorrect. Felons are by default not allowed to vote in Florida. Only after a long and rarely granted process, hinging around the personal whims of a state panel that rarely grants it, are voting rights restored.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 hours ago

Trump is a Florida resident, and Florida law says that a person convicted in another state can vote in Florida if they are allowed to vote in that other state.

- https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/can-trump-vote-now-he-has-felony-convictions

So, we’re both right.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (3 children)

And his excuse was because work was important. Which is exactly why everyone else wants this.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 89 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Trump has told Republicans that they will lose the November midterm elections if they don't pass the bill and crack down on mail-in voting.

You know, any normal person might take such confidence that they'll lose an election as a sign that maybe they're doing the wrong things.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Nope, they take it as a sign of not doing enough wrong things.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BC_viper@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago (17 children)
[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 1 points 6 hours ago

A lot of people are hoping very much that his next cheeseburdler will get the job done.

Come on cheesy, you had one job!!

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Red0ctober@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago

How 'bout them states rights? And small government? Lol

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good thing the constitution leaves it the states to conduct elections, not the federal government.

[–] mech@feddit.org 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the constitution has such a good track record stopping Trump.

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 2 points 6 hours ago

it's pretty much just TP right now.

load more comments
view more: next ›