this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
717 points (99.4% liked)

politics

29328 readers
2443 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://yall.theatl.social/post/9683582

From the Atlanta Tribune:

Previously Unseen Docs Reveal That Susie Wiles Witnessed Trump Showing a Classified Map to Unnamed Plane Passengers, and President Took Sensitive Document Accessible to Only Six People in the U.S. Government Washington, D.C. (March 25, 2026)—Rep. Jamie Raskin, Ranking Member of the House Judiciary Committee, sent a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi demanding urgent […]The post New documents reveal Trump stole classified documents to advance his business interests appeared first on Atlanta Tribune.

#Atlanta #AtlantaTribune #theATLBot

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cyrano@piefed.social 88 points 1 week ago

⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡏⠉⠛⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠈⠛⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠛⠉⠁⠀⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⠿⠿⠿⠻⠿⠿⠟⠿⠛⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣸⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣄⠀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣴⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠠⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⠀⠀⢰⣹⡆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣭⣷⠀⠀⠀⠸⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀⠈⠉⠀⠀⠤⠄⠀⠀⠀⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢾⣿⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀⡠⠤⢄⠀⠀⠀⠠⣿⣿⣷⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡀⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢄⠀⢀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠉⠁⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢹⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 86 points 1 week ago (4 children)

You know they used to hang people for treason and sedition

[–] SwifferWetjet@thelemmy.club 23 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Draw, and quarter too.

I, for one, would not want to see that.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] SwifferWetjet@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fair on yeh. I just had enough of an eyeful from that goddamn spray tan leaked photo.😭😐

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 62 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This is actually a bigger deal than just a "No shit, Sherlock," only not in the direction of exposing what Trump did. We ALL fucking know he hoovered up whatever he thought he could sell on the international elite markets. That's no surprise; that's not even news.

But for those of us who waited all last year for Special Counsel Jack Smith's report to be released publicly, only to see it suppressed by Trump's favorite judge in Florida, Aileen Cannon, this is a big deal. It's sort of an Epstein Files, Part Duh.

Special Counsel Jack Smith is the guy who, along with a number of career (read: not partisan aligned) prosecutors, assembled two cases against Trump: the 2020 election interference, and the documents handling. The documents case is the one Aileen Cannon delayed until she could throw it out, and then when the report was due to be released, as they almost all are, she ordered that suppressed as well, along with all the evidence assembled backing it.

This gag order imposed on Jack Smith, specifically, is so unusually extreme and all-encompassing that Smith was legally barred from testifying to Congress on his own report's specific contents when subpoenaed to appear in a deposition by the House Judiciary Committee.

But with the same nimble political dexterity they have handled the Epstein files, Trump and his butt sniffers on the House Judiciary Committee have been trying like hell to smear Jack Smith: the report is apparently so incendiary they all live in fear of it coming out, so they have been working overtime to get ahead of the inevitable leak or release by using it to disparage Jack Smith and by extension his evidence.

In pursuit of this goal of somehow maligning Jack Smith, the House Judiciary Committee has been using that report like a menu to request materials about the original case from the DoJ. And they've been getting them -- including materials that either include or make detailed mention of the specific information that Judge Cannon specifically embargoed in her order suppressing Smith's report and any discussion of it, including Smith's Congressional testimony:

This particular production contained a memorandum detailing non-public information about the classified documents Trump stole when leaving office. The newly produced materials offer a startling view of evidence gathered by Special Counsel Jack Smith during his investigations into the criminal activity of President Trump, even as DOJ continues to suppress Volume II of his final report.

Rep. Jamie Raskin, the ranking (non-butt-sniffing) member of the House Judiciary Committee, saw this for what it is and fired off a letter to Pam Bondi, detailing what was obviously being hidden and demanding answers, specifically, "on who accessed the materials, what they contained, and whether any foreign actors were able to access or exploit the information. He also called for the release of all remaining investigative files, including the full, unredacted Special Counsel report."

This is also directly relevant to the war in Iran:

“If this map is related to our military posture in the Middle East, and it was in fact shown to any foreign official, Saudi or otherwise, that would amount to an unforgiveable betrayal of our men and women in uniform who are currently valiantly fighting in President Trump’s disastrous war against Iran,” wrote Ranking Member Raskin.

This is the upshot (emphasis mine):

DOJ’s hypocrisy in gagging Jack Smith is underscored by this latest disclosure. Special Counsel Smith remains barred from sharing information with Congress under a sweeping gag order imposed by Justice Cannon, at the request of Donald Trump, and enforced by DOJ. At the same time, DOJ has produced cherry-picked documents to aid Chairman Jordan’s vindictive campaign against Special Counsel Smith and his team, including some documents that appear to violate Judge Cannon’s order. DOJ appears to view the judicial order as rules for thee—Jack Smith—but not for me. However, it appears that the evidence against Donald Trump collected by Jack Smith and memorialized in his records is so damning, that even DOJ’s carefully curated production cannot fully excise findings that the President sold out national security to advance his own business interests.

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He rapes kids and everybody knows it, idk how any document could ever matter at this point

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't believe in giving that asshole a pass on ANYTHING, and I would suggest the same strategy to you, especially since what they believe he passed along was related to current US troop safety in the region.

I don't believe in the war, but I also don't believe in cannon fodder. It's not Barron who's going to bleed for this.

I say hold that piece of shit responsible for ALL of it.

I say hold that piece of shit responsible for anything lol, yeah i agree with you he should have gotten prison for life or even the death penalty back in the 1970s for his crimes, but im not in charge man. All i can do is go to protests and hold a sign that says trump rapes kids. I guess what im saying is ive been hearing for ten years now new documents proving trump did another thing that is punishable by death, a new document is never gonna do anything until congress or the military or someone with power actually holds him to account.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I get the sentiment, but are you suggesting we not care about stories like this?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Barbuzie@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago

No shit Sherlock, who would have thought?

[–] wizblizz@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh come on, would a 34 time convicted felon lie, cheat and steal?

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 14 points 1 week ago

No way, I'm sure he's learned his lesson - Susan Collins

[–] Heikki2@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Who would have thought a 34 time felon for fraud, sexuual assaulter found civilly liable, adulter, best friends with the world's most famous pedofile whom described Trump as "The worst person he has ever known", guy willing to say anything to get elected like "I will bring gas down" and "I will not start new wars, she will" could not be trusted with state secrets.

Shock I tell you, I am shocked.

I other news water is wet and the DOW is still above 45k

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I other news water is wet

no it isn't. water makes stuff wet

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The thing that makes it harder to have hope for the future is that this is like the 147th story about this piece of shit, of just a similar magnitude (we're looking at thousands of fucked stories if we count all of them). Trump is the thief of hope. I know that before Trump, I was a LOT more hopeful in general. We can talk all day about other presidents being fucked up and they are. But it totally changes the psychology of millions/billions when corruption like this is allowed to thrive in the open. The phrase "the death of truth" has been used and it's real. Before Trump, there was a line somewhere that a politician could cross which would lose them support. Honestly it's hard to believe that even a video of Trump raping a child would change the minds of at least a few million of these fucks. It's so disheartening.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trump might not face consequences, but America will. The world can see that the post-WWII status quo of American hegemony needs to end and the fact that Trump has already torpedoed your position in international trade and is in the process of bleeding your military dry means that there's a clear path to bringing that about. Soon it won't matter what the American President does, at least not as far as most of the human race is concerned. That's something to be hopeful for.

It'll still matter to the people unfortunate enough to live within the United States' borders but, well, they voted for this.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Imagine if a Democrat did this

[–] tektite@slrpnk.net 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Surely this can't possibly be worse than wearing a tan suit or riding a bicycle?

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't forget Dijon mustard

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 7 points 1 week ago

it's fine when daddy dumpy does it, but if one of those gross fucking dems did it, there'd be fucking hell to pay. Remember, every accusation is a confession. Fuck republicans so fucking hard.

[–] green_goglin@thelemmy.club 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] homes@piefed.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

This guy is so corrupt, that he buried his ex-wife on his own golf course so he could keep cheating on her.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dizzle18@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

One day, journalism students will research this time period as the age of news media “breaking” news that was already plainly fucking obvious to anyone with a functioning brain and working eyeballs.

[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Hopefully it teaches the importance of the press and its use of primary sources to confirm our suspicions.

The irony of this statement is that this is not the first time in history for these shenanigans.

[–] ChetManly@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

When you're famous they let you grab em by the classification banner

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 15 points 1 week ago

Wow, totally out of character. Who would have guessed?

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 15 points 1 week ago

This is FALSE because the name ISNT Hunter Biden!

-Free Thinking Republicans!

[–] wavebeam@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Imagine a country where a child rapist, conman and failed businessman is elected president, and then convicted of stealing classified documents, among other crimes... only to be elected again!

Yeah, that's the world's leading superpower... How did you know?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Propaganda works

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

This asshole, along with all of his family, should be frog-marched straight into prison.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In other surprising news, the sun is a star.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

And nothing is done about it. Criminal keeps doing criminal shit without a single consequence.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

It's still important to prove it. It takes it from something obvious to his opponents to historical fact.

[–] br0da@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And you just know he will face all the consequences for this

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zink@programming.dev 8 points 1 week ago

Maybe this could finally help some people learn how sick you must be to be a billionaire, and how bad of an idea it is to give even more power to such people.

Probably not. But maybe!

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 1 week ago

Yeah, he was going to sell them to the highest bidder, for money. That's Donald Trump's only business - making money, any way possible, including Treason.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

New documents re-confirm what previous investigations had already been aware of.

And still, no consequences are forthcoming.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

Oh how singularly unshocking.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

You're allowed to do this now. it's perfectly legal

[–] Yankee_Self_Loader@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

He should have also stolen those documents

As long as the stealing happened while he was president, he's off scot free. As are any future document-stealing presidents.

[–] BootyBuccaneer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How the fuck is this not treason?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The usual answer is that it’s only treason in times of war, but since the majority of voters are racist shitbags here we are. Jack Smith would have moved forward under Harris but I’m reliably informed she loved the genocide in a way that made trump preferable. For his genocide lovin’. So.

Tbf, with the US it's always times of war. 🤭

No but seriously, thanks for that explanation.

[–] metermatic26@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Captain Obvious, reporting for duty, sir!

load more comments
view more: next ›