this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
684 points (99.1% liked)

politics

29217 readers
2263 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 297 points 4 days ago (8 children)

So he is building his own Fuhrer bunker.

[–] raman_klogius@ani.social 209 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Ah, so the headline is worded wrong.

He's not seething, he's führerious!

[–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 72 points 4 days ago (3 children)

And we all know what he did last in his bunker

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 67 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fonix232@fedia.io 27 points 4 days ago

Made his best artwork ever!

I mean just consider the dedication needed to make a pièce de résistance right as the Red Army is almost at the doors, using nothing but the raw concrete walls of the Führerbunker as canvas, his trusty Walther PPK as brush, and his own grey matter as paint... I'd dare say it's the most consequential piece of art of the 20th and maybe even the 21st century. It's a shame it was destroyed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

It's more like a Führer rape dungeon, knowing the Epstein files.

[–] homes@piefed.world 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Hey look at that. That one dude that posted the stuff here 6 months ago or so about the designs and plans and mentioned how all of the donors were related to people that are doing underground data centers and stuff like that for Israel are the same group that are working on this with none of the other people that should be involved with ballrooms like Tiffany and stuff like that being associated.

[–] Einskjaldi@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

It's also important to note that someone else wanted that to happen and trump personally really wants a ballroom that's bigger and gaudier than obamas.

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago

I absolutely would have known nothing about the military complex but for Trump opening his big mouth about it repeatedly.

Knowledgeable people are aware that any construction at the White House also involves fortifications and bunkers.

[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 155 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Sure sounds like someone who is making plans to stay in office past this term.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 43 points 4 days ago

He go in bunker, we weld shut from the outside. Everybody win!

[–] plyth@feddit.org 17 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Or he is preparing for somebody who is coming after him.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Probably would've scurried into it when he loses the 2028 run

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Good. We can seal the doors, cut the power, and leave him and his cronies to rot in there forever.

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Quickly Mr. President, help me bring the guests to your fancy ballroom a cask of amontillado we keep in the secret bunker.

[–] Vupware@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He would totally bite. There’s no way he’s familiar with that story

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Angrydeuce@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

I saw this movie, it was called Civil War and was one of the most genuinely anxiety fueling films Ive seen in recent years.

What kind of American are you?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (5 children)

It's scheduled to be completed months before the election, but the part he cares about is underground.

The thing is, even if there's absolutely zero way to get inside, it doesn't mean shit if no one outside the bunker listens to him.

It would be the perfect ending to this if he really goes down into a bunker with his closest circle who have the supplies to live decades...

And after waiting a while we just seal the doors.

It would 100% be worse than prison for everyone sealed in there. Just leave them to die together in a hole.

But the ironic part is there was already a bunker there, and it's likely now compromised.

So if the new one doesn't get finished, there won't be any bunker under his direct control.

He wanted to build his own, so that no one else knew how to open it. Like, if he went to one of the still secret bunkers like under Biltmore, people that are outside know how to get him out.

[–] modus@lemmy.world 109 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 48 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

God is Dead. USA is a rotting corpse.

Regular people should be taking advantage of the worlds disorder right now. Reclaim humanity.

Billionaires and their companies...

If only Iran would start going after the companies supporting data centers and the tech bro dependencies.

If there is two things trump is a expert on its stupid and lawsuit. Its just one thing with him though.

[–] redwattlebird@thelemmy.club 37 points 3 days ago

The cost keeps increasing. That's hilarious.

But of course he was building a bunker. There's literally no surprises there. It'll be the new den of rape for sure.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

Pfff. He would have posted pics of it himself eventually.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 28 points 3 days ago (3 children)

This won't be finished in time for him to use it so I guess someone else is pushing for the bunker and they decided to put a ballroom on top to get his approval.

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Or perhaps the contractors involved are giving him or his associates kickbacks from a construction scam, so, it doesn’t need to be finished ever for him to benefit.

[–] Small_Quasar@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Oh, that's definitely happening, regardless of anything else. I bet you Washington has started including necessary corruption in cost analysis the same way Banana Republics do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 7 points 3 days ago

I bet they don't even pour the foundation while he still president/alive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

America chose fascism. And you're surprised when fascists act like fascists?

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

America is fascism, just ask the indigenous people deprived of their land and life, the piles of dead buffalo slaughtered as part of accomplishing the American genocide, and the dead slaves. This isn't America acting like Nazis, Nazis acted like Americans - Hitler was directly inspired by how we treated migrants at the southern border.

But yeah, while we're on the topic anyway...

The Vorbunker (upper bunker or forward bunker) was an underground concrete structure originally intended to be a temporary air-raid shelter for Adolf Hitler and his guards and servants. It was located behind the large reception hall that was added onto the old Reich Chancellery, in Berlin, Germany, in 1936.

(Note that quote says "located behind", which makes it sound above-ground, but it was an underground bunker).

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fascism was never defeated, instead the US spread it around until the whole world became fascist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] patruelis@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Omfg, he's so fking dumb. Idiocracy!

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 51 points 4 days ago (2 children)

We figured this out months ago, but the media didn't report it at all. It was never about the ballroom, always the bunker underneath.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago

Fuck the new billionairre media.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 1dalm@lemmy.today 65 points 4 days ago (13 children)

Is anyone surprised? I mean, did you guys think it was really a $300 million dollar ballroom?

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 170 points 4 days ago

Is anyone surprised?

Yeah, kinda. I assumed it was a $90 million ballroom with the remaining $210 million being funneled to cronies.

[–] celeste@kbin.earth 52 points 4 days ago

I thought he was pocketing it

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 62 points 4 days ago (6 children)

After big tech hurled money at him we should have all automatically assumed there's an underground datacenter in the works there.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 24 points 4 days ago

And the major power upgrades the city is doing, architect change, sponsors, military consultants, footprint, etc...

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] QueenMidna@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 days ago

It's not a bunker, it's a data center. Just a hardened one.

[–] immobile7801@piefed.social 23 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I honestly thought there was already a bunker under the WH. Too many movies I guess.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 days ago

That's for war, this one is for child rape.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There absolutely is along with some of the best medical facilities in the world and more food and weapons than anywhere else nearby, they just tend to put POTUS on AF1 to stay mobile during duress but that place is a fortress on top of a bunker fortress.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

There was a bunker, it was under the East Wing...

After the U.S. entered World War II, Roosevelt, seeing the need to house additional staff and offices to reflect the growing complexity of the federal government at the time, oversaw the addition of the East Wing in 1942, according to the White House.

The two-story structure was built atop the Presidential Emergency Operations Center, or PEOC, a secure bunker that was built by FDR to serve as a secure meeting place in the event of an emergency.

“While the exact specification of this underground presidential bunker is classified,” according to the White House, “it was originally built to withstand a direct nuclear hit. Access to the PEOC is by an elevator located behind multiple vault-type doors with biometric access control systems.”

https://www.militarytimes.com/veterans/military-history/2025/10/21/the-wwii-origins-of-the-now-demolished-east-wing-of-the-white-house/

He almost certainly got just far enough to compromise the security of the existing bunker, and now won't be able to build the new one in time.

It explains why he's so fucking obsessed with the ballroom

[–] Aeao@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Dumb dumb: the ballroom is under budget!

Citizens: the 200 million ballroom that is now 400 million? That ballroom is under budget? Under the doubled budget expected?

load more comments
view more: next ›