this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
582 points (98.0% liked)

Science Memes

19612 readers
1608 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The killing off of the majority of the human race is an unrequited plus in my book!

[–] Vupware@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is one of those beliefs that can lead to a slippery slope. Yes, from an empirical perspective it needs to happen. But are we okay with how it’s likely to happen? Because the path we’re on has the honest and humble proletariat taking the brunt of the blow while the elite lap up the freshly available assets.

Any attempt to alter that trajectory will probably lead to the same tribalistic and knee-jerk violence that breeds authoritarianism and racism and will not further the progressive cause of coexistence.

So no matter what happens, we’ll likely end up in the same place a few hundred years later.

Or maybe I’m wrong?

[–] RykardNixon@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You’re not wrong. Save for a few thousand over a few hundred

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Personally, I'm excited to see what kind of biomes end up emerging on a melting/melted Antartica.

Well ok, even I'm not pessimistic enough to think I'll live to see that, in a way that its dramatically different than it is now, but hey, its like uh... a subbranch of speculative evolution, sorta.

Maybe in a 100-200 years we have enough glacial loss and icemelt that West Antarctica might have parts where actual soil is regularly facing the sun.

I think this is a 'what if all the ice was gone' map:

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 12 points 1 day ago (4 children)

How exactly were the names "East Antarctica" and "West Antarctica" in that map decided? What does "East" and "West" mean at the South Pole?

[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I googled it: map of antarctica with meridian lines labelled

Image Source: Wikipedia

Anything between lines of longitude 0° - 180° (0° is britain GMT, 180° is opposite side of earth) is EAST.

Anything between 180° to 0 (you can think of as 360°) is WEST.

Thus you have a western hemisphere, which i guess is just tthe americas and british Isles, and an eastern hemisphere, which i guess is most of afroeurasia and australia. This is just about the only way it could've worked, but as for where 0 and 180 went, it's just arbitrary.

I would've defined the Levant as the boundary between east and west hemisphere, instead.


Fun FactEastern Antarctica's ice sheet is older and more well developed than western antarctica. It will probably take longer to melt or collapse than the western half.

Source: Discovering Antarctica

Collapsible bonus image + source

map of antarctica

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-Antarctic-drainage-system-comprising-the-West-Antarctic-WA-ice-sheet-the-East_fig1_338109662

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unless you stand perfectly at the south pr perfectly at the north point of either pole, there will always be an east and a west.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes - but you can choose any point to stand on. So all arbitrary separations in to "East" and "West" are equally valid.

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 2 points 1 day ago

We shall have the compass decide, good sir! We are but mere mortals!

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

you're thinking geographic west and east. what other definitions exist for west and east?

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Under the US’s political sphere of influence vs China’s?

whose map is this? does the chinese map use different words?

[–] sik0fewl@piefed.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Same as now. European influence.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

Personally I am not able to get excited about the prospect, with the knowledge that it happens on the back of millions of species going extinct all over the globe.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago

Probably 100% cow pastures.

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 47 points 2 days ago (3 children)

"Most of us" is not "all of us". Humanity will survive and the survivors will adapt.

Nothing but positivity here.

[–] FundMECFS@piefed.zip 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Always the poor, disabled, marginalised, chronically ill, non first world, will be hit the hardest and die at the highest rates.

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My professional advice is to not be any of those things when shit hits the fan.

[–] FundMECFS@piefed.zip 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Tries to wish lifelong chronic illness away

[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My professional advice is that i expect someone who is involved in environmental prepper groups would be the most protected from climate catastrophe/have the best access to protection when shit hits the fan.

Controversial opinion: I also don't think shit will hit the fan too bad except for certain countries. But the USA, or parts of it, might be one of those countries. And a lot of nations are at risk.

So maybe neither of these things are whitepilling depending on what your illness is and where you live. But i tried

[–] FundMECFS@piefed.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Hard to be in an environmental prepper group if you’re too disabled/chronically ill to leave your bed haha. I’ve just accepted if shit really hits the fan I’m dying.

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Have tried being a millionair? That seems to make problems go away quite easily.

[–] Draconic_NEO@mander.xyz 1 points 14 hours ago

Those dumbasses build their houses right on the beach, they will ultimately be hit very hard by climate change.

[–] conartistpanda@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I prefer being a millionearth since I walk to places.

[–] FundMECFS@piefed.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah I would still be ill but it would be “oh that sucks and I can afford it” not “my survival is constantly on the line”.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

you know what has been really funny all my life. laughing at the rich people in the hospital.

oh wait, i'm not that much of a dick. money doesn't keep them from being sick, strangely enough.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Money does buy access to a lot better treatments, though.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

sometimes yes sometimes no. sometimes they throw amazing treatments at you for free if you are willing to be in a trial and money can't get you into those. trust me, i have tried to bribe my way into a few with money i didn't have, and once the best connections in the world couldn't get me in

[–] morto@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

When it comes to climate change I'm not sure. We on the poorer side of the world already live in a constant crisis and adaptation and drastically changing our way to live might not hit us as hard as for people in first world countries who are used to a high dependence on industry and globalization. In fact, we're already slowly adapting without most people even noticing.

[–] FundMECFS@piefed.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

100% but what you neglect to mention is the poorer world already has far higher mortality rates. This will only make it worse.

[–] morto@piefed.social 2 points 23 hours ago

That's true :(

[–] joostjakob@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I tend to agree that developped countries tend to underestimate the fragility of their systems. But then there still are simple facts like if you spend 10% of your income on food, you can afford significant food price hikes. If you spend 70% of income on food, then a small rise is already lethal.

[–] morto@piefed.social 1 points 23 hours ago

True, but on the other hand, if international trade diminishes, we're on the food production side. The places who depend on imports will be hit much harder.

[–] WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

That’s if we survive WWIII, disease, and climate change.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The majority of other species wont survive or adapt though. And all because of something we caused. It's not only humans sharing this Earth, even though a lot of us sure acts as if that is the case.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

probably means the dragon tree, dracaena species, but thats in madagascar and socatra mostly

[–] joostjakob@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And the Canary islands too. I wonder if there's precedent from them going extinct in mainland Africa and the naturally returning

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 12 hours ago

seems like dracaena species is native to africa, multiple ones. the dragon blood tree is unique to socatra and parts of SA.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's not how that works. The Sahara savannah is tied to the rotation of the earth on its axis. That takes roughly 23,000 years. The period of time between savannah periods is about 13,000 years and the last one ended roughly 6,000-7,000 years ago. The next one will start in roughly 6,0000-7,000 more years.

[–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is oversimplified, by a lot. There are many factors impacting Africa's aridity, including the current glaciation cycle, sea levels as a result thereof, the AMOC, etc.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

... Are you aware of any study or perhaps graphic or map based on a studies that... actually tries to model the effects of an AMOC shutdown?

Or maybe 'signifcant weakening' or 'decoherence' would be a more accurate way to out it?

Because I loosely keep up with Paul Beckwith's roughly weekly videos and uh... the SMOC ain't doin so great, and like, currently, and in the last month or two... well, the artctic polar vortex has ... more or less been destabilizing... to a rather extreme amount...

[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Pretty sure that the sahara is classified as a mid latitude desert, similar to the Arabian, the atacama or the great Sandy desert in Australia which are influenced by the Hadley Cells

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

True, but I'm not trying to write a dissertation while enjoying my morning bowl o weed

[–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well you were certainly happy to discredit it. If you aren't willing to explain why, dont speak

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Just like you explained the full thing? That type of "not speaking?"

I simplified things. You added no concrete additional context.

[–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago

Keep talking bro, no one thinks youre right.

[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago
[–] LoonyLenny@lemdro.id 4 points 2 days ago

It will be, like, an oasis for us in the future!