this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
300 points (99.0% liked)

Comics

1306 readers
689 users here now

Post your comics here. Single or multi boxed comics.

Please mark nsfw when appropriate.

Same rules as primary server, no hate.

Please warn others if there may be triggers.

Please mark if the comic is yours either in the title or description

obvious ai images will be removed, please include a source to prevent this

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It's just quantum mechanics, it's not a phone call.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

This one trick that quantum physicists HaTE!

[–] markz@suppo.fi 5 points 19 hours ago (2 children)
[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 1 points 10 hours ago

Impossible to tell until the box is opened... or something

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 4 points 18 hours ago

Not right now thank you, maybe later

[–] egrets@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago
[–] Niberius@sopuli.xyz 39 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Read ages ago that at MIT or wherever they taught rocket science they would say "it's just rocket science, it's not music theory." No clue if that's actually true tho

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The one I always heard as a failed physicist cum engineer was "rocket science is 80% plumbing"

[–] phar@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago

I've heard the same about cum engineering

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 17 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I always thought things like music theory and biology were harder because it's often words and classifications given to things before they were codified and then when you learn the actual theory it's like "well, this thing is named identically to that other piece of theory over there because we used to think they were the exact same but actually they couldn't be more different". Chemistry can be similar but has a much more rigid structure than music theory and biology.

Physics at least tends to start with math and connects to theory later.

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 12 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Genetics is especially bad, since newly-discovered genes are named based on their function, while genes that were discovered in the early days of genetics research were instead named based on what happens to the body when they don't work, since we didn't know enough about biology back then to determine what their exact function was. This leads to situations like how one of the prominent genes featured in eye development is called "Retina and Anterior Neural Fold Homeobox," and another is called "Eyeless."

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

It's very likely that most people that study rocket engineering can't learn music theory at all. Just like the other way around.

[–] AnarchoEngineer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Actually the opposite is true in my experience. Many engineers, physicists, and especially mathematicians are interested in music theory and/or play instruments themselves.

A classmate of mine, who is like the “Kyle” stereotype of monster energy drinking gamer, is also an engineering student who happens to be a virtuoso on the cello.

I think four members of my research lab play piano, two can play the violin iirc, and our advisor plays guitar.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

as a scientist myself i can guarantee you i've always looked down on music theory because it takes the fun out of it.

[–] nightlily@leminal.space 3 points 14 hours ago

It’s also a very arbitrary, Eurocentric, and not grounded in actual biological or physical fact. It’s not „sounds that sound good universally across humanity“, despite how its adherents present it.

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 1 points 19 hours ago

So, you have never read Hesse it seems
Pretty much the essence of at least quite some books of him is, that music and math are basically the same thing

[–] lath@piefed.social 15 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It's just quantum mechanics, it's not DnD.

[–] Get_Off_My_WLAN@fedia.io 11 points 22 hours ago

DM: "Fuck."

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

there was a launch, when they found a crack on the engine cone, and decided to trimm the last cm of the cone to fix it.

Officially the hardest thing ever done, literally rocket surgery

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

nah, cm tolerance is still osteo difficulty. brain surgery is tighter tolerances. need steadier hands

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I'd say brain surgery and rocket science are harder than quantum physics because people won't die if you get the quantum physics wrong.

[–] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 3 points 16 hours ago

Even with rockets, you can test with unmanned launches. You don't really get "practice rounds" like that with brain surgery.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

because people won’t die if you get the quantum physics wrong.

Well, not with that attitude!

(Okay, I guess, in pure quantum physics, nobody is going to get hurt by it. But if you venture into applied quantum physics -- quantum engineering -- then you begin to reintroduce the possibility that getting it wrong could cause serious harm in some cases.)

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

i'm sorry but the whole "pure" and "applied" division between physics cracks me up because drugs. I would like to buy some physics please but *dips finger* is it pure? y'all really need a better word

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

Just ignore high-energy physics, plasma dynamics, and etc.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Well at least it's not quantum brain science.

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Verbally instructed quantum rocket surgery over a phone call.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

But can they CORRECTLY:

Install a skylight?

Prune a tree?

Harvest strawberries?

"The laborer is worthy of his hire," when their expertise serves the endeavor at hand, whatever that is.

(Does not include anyone who buys companies to fire the employees and sell off the assets, or corrupts whole industries with AI and data stealing. Anyone who's bankrupted a casino and/or welched on due payments need not apply.)

[–] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

If they have a few hours of training I'm sure a brain surgeon, rocket scientist, or quantum scientist could do any of those things. Lots of educated people understand that the narrow focus of their education doesn't make them good at everything else too. Unfortunately not all educated people understand that, though, and it seems like the over-confident ones get a lot more attentive.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago

From reports, they're much more likely to quit before the end of the day