this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
523 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

82855 readers
3088 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tiger_Man_@szmer.info 23 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

""""sideloading"""", oh look who cant say installing software

[–] techt@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago

"Sideloading" is the "jaywalking" of the mobile space

[–] xcjs@programming.dev 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I do not consider a win, and I will continue applying pressure where I can.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago

Please share how

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 67 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Can someone please come out with a phone that's an actual computer and help stop this nonsense?

Phones cost a lot of money at this point and I'm completely sick of them being some locked down, surveillance ridden pile of crap. A reasonably built one would be able to replace a laptop at this point if it weren't for these artificial constraints imposed by the stupid fucking suits running things.

[–] Kailn@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 15 hours ago

There, exacly what you want.
Here's a more budget one.

GPD has been making "mini laptops" for a long while, now they try to make similar gaming handheld.
I'm not sponoered nor I've bought this for myself. (yet)

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Valve should make a Linux phone. Smaller Steam Deck with a modem

[–] Martyy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I would LOVE a linux phone

[–] HexaBack@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago

furilabs flx1s. I'm using one

[–] kepix@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

dude. you can just install a custom rom.

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 4 points 19 hours ago

As long as your phone model is supported by any custom mod. I have checked compatibility for almost all smartphones I owned, some 7 or 8 through the years.

Not a single one of them was ever supported by a custom mod.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 18 hours ago

Intentionally non-standard hardware does not get a real custom rom. It’s just a mod of Android which Google can render intentionally incompatible any time they want

[–] entwine@programming.dev 38 points 1 day ago

If antitrust was being enforced, Google execs wouldn't even dream of attempting this bullshit.

Antitrust regulation is probably the easiest way to fix the biggest problems in our society, it is 100% bipartisan, and it is easy to explain to the average US voter. The only group that is against it is the billionaires/ultra wealthy. Instead, politicians are all hyperfocused on culture war mudslinging and bullshit that makes no difference.

Break up Apple, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta (just to start), and watch how the tech industry explodes with innovation again, and the tech billionaire becomes an endangered species. The AI bubble will burst as companies actually need to compete to survive, and thus won't be burning as much resources on crap that clearly doesn't work.

[–] Fedditor385@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I, as the owner of my device, don't want to wait 24h.

I hope this will popularize the ROM community again. It gradually faded out due to mainstream ROMs having every perk of the custom ROMs but now the custom ROMs can start offering freedom, which no official ROM will offer.

[–] aquovie@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 day ago

Is there a tap to pay system that works on custom ROMs? I thought those really required SafetyNet/PlayIntegrity/Whatever-it-is-now.

I would rather not give up tap to pay but I will if I have to. It seems like trying to Magisk my way into getting Google Wallet to work would be a PITA.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] h4arts@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

still just not gonna update my phone for a while until they've for sure have allowed side loading. Got my pixel because it's just a nice phone, and i can put graphene on it when it's paid off. Half of my apps are all from f-droid, too.

[–] freddo@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You cannot install graphene until it is paid off?

[–] mememuseum@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Some carriers lock the bootloader until you've paid off the phone.

Phones produced for sale through Verizon have a permanently locked bootloader.

[–] Archr@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck Verizon for this exact reason. Never buy from them direct if you can help it.

[–] mememuseum@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

Didn't realize this when switching. Went through a whole kerfuffle to cancel the trade in deal.

Phone agent sounded perplexed when I wanted to keep my old Pixel 7 Pro lol.

Why is that?

Would you be able to change the IMEI as I would have thought those were encoded on the hardware chip. If you could it means they couldn’t blacklist the phone if you stopped paying.

Paying you can spoof it

[–] h4arts@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 21 hours ago

xfinity locks the bootloader until you get your phone paid off and you call them to get it unlocked

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 69 points 1 day ago (6 children)

It’s not side loading. It’s installing software on the device you probably paid multiple thousands for that you no longer own.

[–] Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org 1 points 15 hours ago

Multiple thousands!? No phone isn't worth that much. Bloody marketing brainwashing people into accepting exorbitant prices for everything.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 50 points 1 day ago (8 children)

To call the install of apps of your choice as «sideloading», means that they have won.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 53 points 1 day ago

I'm writing an app that I will distribute only through f-droid. The people I would like to share it with are typical, non-technical android users. Before those changes I could just send them a link to f-droid apk and explain it's just another app store or send a link to the apk directly and probably most of them would be able to install it. Now I would have to tell them to do all those weird things first, things that look suspicious and that they would not understand the purpose of. I don't think anyone will be wiling to do it. This is not a win. The effect will be exactly the same - serious limits on distributing apps though alternative channels.

[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 360 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Making users wait 24 hours doesn't improve security; it's an anti-competitive change designed to make the Google Play store seem like less of a hassle in comparison.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 95 points 2 days ago (23 children)

I can actually see where it can improve security against scammers trying to scam elderly and non-tech savvy people.

  • Scammer tries to get someone to install malware from their site
  • Victim isn't familiar with sideloading, but scammer instructs them
  • Victim hits the first time 24 hour block and has to restart and wait
  • The restart alone breaks contact with the scammer, scam thwarted

For the rest of us that know our way around Android, it's just a one time annoyance, after completing all the steps to enable sideloading, you won't have to wait 24 hours anymore.

[–] zzffyfajzkzhnsweqm@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Scammers almost always install remote desktop app from play store. This is just anti competitiveness....

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

This is only the first step, they will keep adding more bullshit like this in the name of security till you end up with a device that's nothing more than a advertisement terminal for google

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] sonofearth@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It is always like this. Make a very anti consumer decision that everyone hates, then tone it down so the half of those people will say “we won”. This is a loss.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SuspciousCarrot78@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Narrator: No, they did not, in fact, win.

[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 176 points 2 days ago

No we didn't win. This is Google making it harder to install the programs you want, rather than the programs Google wants you to have.

[–] pirate2377@lemmy.zip 90 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Microsoft appeared to walk back Recall until they suddenly brought it back unannounced and doubled down. So I'll believe it when I see it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] morto@piefed.social 129 points 2 days ago (24 children)

So, we will have to enable developer mode for that? How long before banking and government apps refuse to run if you have "sideloaded" apps installed? This will be the same as not allowing the majority of people to sideload. No win in here, just an advanced strategy from google to make us conform

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] Jorn@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)

My galaxy will let me install but then I get this when I try to run the app:

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Disable Google Play Protect. It's a scam that doesn't protect you at all, it just gives more control to Google.

[–] entwine@programming.dev 14 points 1 day ago

Google Play Protect is designed to protect Google Play from competitors

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 day ago

Of course we didn't win. the more hoops you have to jump through, the fewer people who will install their own apps and then you lose all of the community support. And Google didn't promise not to change their plans in the future. So you know that they'll promise this now. Maybe they'll backtrack a little if they have to and they will try to ratchet things up six months later anyway.

Real solutions involve either breaking up monopolies or breaking up monopolies, which is why some of the other cell phone vendors' actions recently look positive. If there are two versions of Android that are popularly used, then the banks will have to support both of them and then everyone can run away from Google whenever they feel like it. But if there's only one popular version and Android itself gets more and more locked down then that is Google seizing the entire market and they will cut out all of the other cell phone manufacturers as soon as they can. that will be just as bad as Apple.

load more comments
view more: next ›