In other news, polymarket has a new bet on the ratio that make it back alive.
this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
122 points (99.2% liked)
politics
28881 readers
2013 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Without an internal opposition to back in Iran, I don’t see how the U.S. could win a war against the mullahs.
Huh, I thought the war was over?
I mean, the war that wasn't really a war and many of his sycophantic apparatchiks were claiming would not have boots on the ground?
Don’t forget what you’re fighting for.
Not to mention giving the crazy xtian fucks their pipe dreams of having Jayzus come back on a cloud and rapture all these morons up while they get to watch other tortured horribly.
I mean, what a perfectly normal ethical system. It doesn't sound at all like a dream of a total psychopath, getting front row seats to others being tortured and reveling in the notion that they'd be tortured forever. By a loving god, because they didn't accept the highly-dubious truth claims and demented ethical system offered up in "the" bible....
This is the mission creep of this war. No clear objectives no exit strategy. Send more ships more troops.
Without blowing another big hole in our budget, people might get the idea that we should start taxing the Epstein class to fund things like childcare, healthcare, education, scientific research, feeding, clothing and housing all our people, and updating/fixing our infrastructure here at home.
There is always going to be money to pay for bullshit like this in "defense" of 'merica, but anything done for actual people IN America will have to be means tested and always up for getting cut by the likes of idiots that thought "doge" was a good idea.
Gotta have a war going so no one talks about Epstein.
No better way to distract from raping hundreds of children than by murdering a few thousand brown ones
Not all of the American children will be brown, but they're probably poor and they will be praised for their bravery so people don't feel as bad,
One of the gems of the latter simpsons episodes is grandpa mocking the complaints of an iraq war vet "It was too hot, the USO show was rob schneider, US objectives were and remain incomprehensible."
The same will apply here, except the uso show will be kid rock.
Nothing like a super uncoordinated halfassed deployment against the biggest adversary we have faced in 75 years all in the furtherance of a war with no objectives and no reason to even be happening apart from leadership that couldn't think of anything better to do.
"WOOO! 'merica!"
-red hatted idiots, probably
Marines, remember who you are fighting for...
Jfc this is actually insane
Bad archive site, that's the one that edits stored content and uses its visitors to DDoS a blog.
What will be this quagmire’s “Fortune Son” I wonder
Pretty sure it's Fortunate Son.
"I ain't no rich pedophile's son." *Guitar riff
VcQwvQ
:eyes narrow:
Suspiciously close, but obviously not the one. lol
??? I'm confused?
Another Vietnam, for nothing. JFC.
No, not for nothing. For imperialism, for the Trump-Epstein files, for pork barrel politics, for the MIC, for oil.
Also israel's foreign policy objectives.
This shit makes Vietnam look like a well planned and thought out war.
This war is less popular than Vietnam
When Vietnam got rolling, it was supported. And depending on when you consider it "starting", since the slide from France's imperialist aims over to being ours is more nuanced. We were "involved" by 1950. But starting in 1965, it looks like 59% thought the war was not a mistake.
great idea orange man, this is gonna be real popular come midterms!
I wonder if "JD" "Vance" supposedly being a doubter is part of the playbook.
If PEDOnald has to step down to health reasons, "JD" "Vance" looks like the "sensible" one by firing Hegseth and ending this unnecessary war. His poll numbers skyrocket, since he'll be the Republican that won't do all the excesses that PEDOnald had (except he will, he'll just be less stupid and brash about it. It will be much quieter but twice as devious).
In parallel, they stop talking about Epstein at all and won't even take questions about it...maybe one or two fall guys take the hit - perhaps Blondi. No one really big like PEDOnald sees any punishment whatsoever.
So they're really going for it, ey?
why it matters
AI slop has its fingerprints all over this
I bet they'll try to renact dday for some sick media footage.
They're definitely going to film them putting up a flag somewhere but it won't open the strait of Hormuz.
I’d say, “why not ICE”, but the likelihood that they’d gleefully commit crimes against humanity as soon as their boots hit the soil makes me not wish ICE upon even America’s enemies.
When you only have a hammer, everything is a nail.
It's not the only tool he has, it's just the only one he wants to use.
At least they aren't coming to US cities.
Say "No!" to military service.
Dogde the draft.