this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
424 points (97.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

11123 readers
2229 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yes, the state is dumb. Titles are dumb. Social hierarchy is dumb. Capitalism is dumb. Etc.

TBH I'm not feeling good about all of this ableism. Typical lib meme - pushing for meaningless reformism while throwing the marginalized under a bus.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 53 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Every public figure who uses the term "Gulf of America" should be taken out to the exact center of it and left there in a life boat.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 15 points 1 week ago

Every public figure who uses the term “Gulf of America” should be taken out to the exact center of it and left there ~~in a life boat.~~

No need to waste the life boat...

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (3 children)

... Why? It's a way more accurate name.

[–] gens@programming.dev 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Department of Securing Oil Profits"

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

"Department of Fascist Fucktards" or "DoFF"

[–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Still a laughable (if it wasn't for reality) endeavor. It should be dismantled, not renamed.

[–] HailSeitan@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Doesn’t calling it the Department of War make it easier to defund and eventually dismantle, though?

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

In this political climate? Hell no, quite the opposite.

And this political climate is all about never allowing another political climate.

[–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You seriously going to ask that question after Trump won twice? This country is almost Warhammer levels of up its own ass about war being cool...

[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Because it was created by an act of congress and renamed twice by acts of Congress after ww2.

If the Republicans want to rename DoD they could have put it in their "big beautiful bill", but they didn't. So it's still DoD and should be referred to as such.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago
[–] GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The only exception is when juxtaposing those titles with the administration's claims that this is not a war.

"Secretary of War Pete Kegsbreath, head of the Department of War, claims that he is not waging war by deploying weapons of war against Iran."

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

Secretary of War of the Deparment of War plans on sending warfighters equiped with lethal weapon systems into war to not fight war. /s

[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] leftascenter@jlai.lu 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] essell@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

HERE-THEY'RE

Tora! Tora! Tora!

[–] HailSeitan@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No. At least pretending to be good prevented these latest kind of wars

[–] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Did it really??? We had lots of these type of wars before. They'd just sell us something about women's rights and that we'd be welcomed as liberators instead.

I feel better about a country that feels the need to sell it's people on wars under this premise, but it didn't matter to the people getting bombed. I'm not an accelerationist, but it might even be better this way since the American people aren't buying the rationales for this one.

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Can't fight for the foreign rights of women while you disenfranchise your own women at home? I guess that would take logic to figure out so they can probably get away with it to their base, but the rest of the world sees right through you.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

There were women that got to grow up with rights in Afganistan. People worked and fought to make that because that was a justification (one of) for that war. Now we dont even have that. Just the bombs and naked greed

Uh... the War ~~of~~ on Terror?

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 10 points 1 week ago

Just wait until Trump renames the USA to the Kingdom of Trump America, and the New York Times and CNN immediately comply as if it had always been so.

[–] Bonsoir@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Absolutely! They should rename it something like the "Ministry of Peace", so it sounds softer. I don't like negative and violent connotations. It scares me.

[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The "Department of War" was changed to the "National Military Establishment" by the National Security Act of 1947, and then to "Department of Defense" by the Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1958.

Absent an act of Congress changing its name again, the official and legal name is still "Department of Defense". Journalists accepting the new nickname uncritically are endorsing an unconstitutional power grab, and should be ridiculed and shamed for doing so.

It's not like Republicans don't have majorities in both houses of Congress sufficient to change the name, or even that congressional dems would waste their political energy opposing the vain renaming of a post-WW2 agency.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Republicans like “Noooo don’t deadname my special thing! Nooooo!!”

The anti-pronoun party once again fully understanding the concepts and yet showing us once again that the point is the cruelty, not consistency.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

If the country survives we really need congress to officially name a DC public toilet for the current fascist

[–] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Hmm. If only we could come up with a select number of words to measure against to determine which major media outlets are propping up fascism with their choice of language and rhetoric. On the other hand i feel like its probably just all of them.

[–] HowAbt2day@futurology.today 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But a war-grade fart to remain consistent

[–] cdf12345@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ok but we’re going to have to kick another 100,000 people off Medicare to get it in the fart budget

[–] HowAbt2day@futurology.today 5 points 1 week ago

Are there even that many left on it?