this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
472 points (98.6% liked)

Not The Onion

20977 readers
2118 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 222 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Time to start looking up every white-ass right-wing voter in the state that has a second home or spends early November out of state this year and challenge their registration 91 days before the 2028 election.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 61 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

wait'll white people start claiming indigenous people aren't citizens.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 103 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You’re too late. ICE has already arrested people with Native American IDs, claiming they are invalid.

[–] Burninator05@lemmy.world 63 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

ICE has arrested people with valid REAL-IDs claiming they aren't real. They'll do whatever they want to whoever they want.

[–] Kraiden@piefed.social 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

REAL-IDs

Are Native American IDs not real?

ETA: Reading this back, it looks really pas-ag. Not American, the question is sincere. I've never heard of Native American IDs

[–] sudo@lemmy.today 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Kraiden@piefed.social 17 points 2 weeks ago

Oh right! Ok, the comment makes more sense now. Thanks

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 17 points 2 weeks ago

REAL-ID is a new-ish standard required to obtain a driver's license or personal ID. It requires more documentation than was previously required. Native American IDs are real, but REAL-ID is not related.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] kboos1@lemmy.world 40 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That would be hilarious. Just start challenging anyone and everyone with a MAGAt sticker just before the election and lock them all down in pointless bureaucracy of proving their citizenship

[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It says you need some kind of documented evidence but I’m sure that’s pretty easy to gin up for a lot of people.

[–] Inucune@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

AI go brrrr...

[–] RymrgandsDaughter@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

flooding the office is the only way to deal with these things

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Liberals love to pretend the law is self-enforcing and refuse to ask what role the state's deeply racist and violent state bureaucrats, or the police and sheriff's offices (nevermind any ICE agents operating in the state) will play.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Eagle_Eye_(United_States)

Incidentally, Supreme Court Justice William Renquist started his career as a poll-watcher in Arizona, screening out any who looked too Democrat.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Real chaotic good energy. I dig it!

[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

I try. The world needs more chaotic good.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If a county auditor deems the challenge valid

The article doesn't say how South Dakota county auditors are chosen, how they make decisions or what scrutiny they are subject to but I'm not sure I like your chances here

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Do it. Let me know if I can help.

Don't limit it to those that spend time out of state. It's not your job to be accurate. I assume everyone travels.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 105 points 2 weeks ago

So they added pvp to voting

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 84 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Republican Gov. Larry Rhoden signed legislation into law last week that authorizes challenges by individuals and election officials.

It would be a terrible shame if a bunch of people started challenging Larry's citizenship.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"Rhoden"!?!

Sounds like a foreigner to me!

[–] moondoggie@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

He’s obviously a very large monster from Japan. I’m thinking some kind of kaiju mosquito. Dibs on the band name

[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 72 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Not being from the US, I was flabbergasted when I learned how voting laws are working there. Where I live we're all automatically registered by the government. They send a card with your name and your address. If there is an error, or if people don't get a card, they can manually register or correct the error. And we all stay registered unless we move or there is an error. That's it.

I'm in my mid life and had to register once in my 20ies because I moved a lot. Otherwise the government just automatically registers me. Nobody can challenge that except the election's office. They decide who meets the requirements to vote or not. Not some random conservative asshole that thinks people are not white enough. Democracy in the US seems like a joke.

[–] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 41 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It isn't a joke. Jokes are funny. This isn't funny. If hasn't been funny, ever.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

In Canada we have the same thing. You can every year when filling taxes tick off a box to update your voter info to save you the work. You also can register at the voting booth with ID, or proof of residence, or the statement of a registered voter in the area willing to vouch for you.

Basically zero voter fraud.

Voter ID and registration laws are pure voter suppression!

[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Voter ID and registration laws are pure voter suppression!

Indeed. I'm in Canada too so that's why this is familiar to you. As an anecdote, I don't drive and have no license. Once, a long time ago, an election worker was kind of insisting that I had to show one to vote. I had the other required documents and was able to vote but not having a diver's license apparently made them suspicious. And that was my biggest hurdle with providing ID at an election!

Lots of comments can be read about people not going to vote, some even blaming them for the election results, but it's just incredible how difficult they seem to make voting in the US.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] you_are_dust@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

We don't do "efficiency" round these parts.

[–] NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca 35 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So when they receive a complaint about every non-Republican voter, are they going to say that there is a 2 year backlog on paperwork, so these people will have to skip this election?

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Start challenging the Republican voters, then.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

If I lived there then this is what I’d do. Challenge every single person who shows up to vote. After all, how can I personally know they are allowed to vote if they don’t prove it to ME?

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 33 points 2 weeks ago

Nope, that is not democracy

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 31 points 2 weeks ago

South Dakota? Home of Kristi Noem? UNBELIEVABLE!!!

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I fucking hate my country now

[–] Ellvix@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I mean, you hated it before, but you hate it now too

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Probably the most not-the-onion headline I've ever read. My brain keeps trying to illustrate it as comedy to explain it to myself in my mind.

My brain's conclusion?

Jesus fucking Christ, I'm so tired.

[–] SpicyLizards@reddthat.com 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] perishthethought@piefed.social 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Who are you who is so knowledgeable in the ways of science?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

“How could this go wrong?” Said absolutely no one.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

Soooo...every reservation gonna challenge every South Dakotane citizenship?

God I hope so.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Conservatives clearly hate our Constitution. So why don't they secede? Seems like something they'd be into. They even whine about it from time to time.

The answer is because their failing red states require our blue states to exist.

This is an abusive relationship and it's high time we end it. We do not need them. They need us.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 18 points 2 weeks ago

gonna be shocked when all the people challenged aren't white while all the people challenging are.

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Oh, that could be fun. After voting, myself, I'd form a line of like minded folks to pick out likely MAGAS and challenge each multiple times.

[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 weeks ago

This is the correct response to fuckery.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BigTrout75@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

How else are you going to legally bully and intimidate voters?

[–] villainy@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

State law already allows challenges to a voter’s registration up to the 90th day before an election, if a person is suspected of lacking South Dakota residency, voting in another state or being registered to vote in another state. The new law adds citizenship as a justification for a challenge.

Challenges may be filed by the South Dakota Secretary of State’s Office, the auditor in the county where the voter is registered, or a voter in the same county. The challenge must be in the form of a signed, sworn statement and must include what the law describes as “documented evidence.”

So the "challenge" this already exists but citizenship is being added as another reason. I wonder what the requirements for evidence are or if some county officials will call the sworn statement itself "documented evidence."

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

There's a New South Dakota?

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Start with the elected officials who passed this, and their local donors!

I'm assuming each challenge needs resolved separately, right?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 6 points 2 weeks ago

Reunite the Dakotas!

[–] 5oap10116@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

So are there any pro-boner lawyers looking to challenge as many white people as they can?

load more comments
view more: next ›