this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
130 points (96.4% liked)

Selfhosted

57387 readers
1133 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hej lemmings! (Hoping this is relevant enough for the selfhosted commjnity)

Quick question for you all: do you stick with the same distro across your PC, laptop, and server, or do you pick different ones based on the device and what you're doing?

For me, I've been mixing and matching depending on the use case, but I'm starting to think it'd be nice to just have one distro (or at least one family like Fedora or Debian) running everywhere. That way I wouldn't get confused about default settings or constantly have to look up flags for different package managers.

Right now my setup is:

  • Gaming rig: CachyOS
  • Laptop: AuroraOS
  • NAS: Unraid
  • Various project servers: DietPi, Debian, Alpine etc..

I feel like NixOS might be the only distro that could realistically handle all these use cases, but I'm a bit scared of the learning curve and the maintenance work it'd take to migrate everything over.

Am I the only one who feels like having "one distro to rule them all" would be nice? How do you guys handle your setups? All ears! 😊

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 1 points 3 minutes ago* (last edited 3 minutes ago)

Server: debian

Desktop: mint

Laptop: pop-os

Nanopi for travel Jellyfin: Debian.

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

1 Fedora (laptop)

1 bazzite (old gaming desktop)

N+1 Debian on everything else than can

[–] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

My main server runs Ubuntu Server (I'm thinking about switching it to Debian), and my laptop and desktop both run Arch Linux. Generally, I pick whatever I think is best for the given usecase β€” things like stability, package availability, documentation, security, etc. are considered.

[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Every now and then I try something else (usually live usb from ventoy) just to see how others evolve. I like endevour, but I always en up with debian minimal install. Only on mylaptop I add xfce4. It's just rock solid. For my wife's laptop it's elementary, only because of the looks just to make her move from windows to linux painlessly

[–] BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Yes and no, my main system is EndeavourOS as well as one laptop that stays docked in the bedroom as a media PC. My HTPC is running Mint with KDE, my Steam Deck is stock SteamOS, my MacBook Pro is running Asahi Linux, server running TrueNAS and Raspberry Pi's running stock Raspberry Pi OS. Mainly I just like KDE, and have a preference for Arch based systems.

I prefer EndeavourOS and haven't had issues with it for a couple years now, but Mint on the HTPC was a reason to try Mint and I just left it alone except for swapping Cinnamon for KDE. Asahi is the only option for M1 MacBooks so no choice there. Pi OS I never really use the system as a computer, I just have one running PiHole and another running a digital calander for the wife and I, so I only interact with them through ssh or web portals. My Steam Deck works perfectly fine as is and I mainly just use the Steam launcher anyway so no point changing it. The TrueNAS system I mainly use through a web portal or SMB so it's fine.

[–] SpacePirate@feddit.nu 2 points 5 hours ago

I use the following

Debian for Laptop Bazzite for Gaming PC HatvesterHCI for Hypervisor Truenas Scale for NAS (VM with disk pass thru) Rocky Linux for Servers (I have created Hardened Images) I use OS-build to create the Rocky Images

[–] dieTasse@feddit.org 2 points 5 hours ago

Fedora just works for me in every case except NAS where I have TrueNAS, so Fedora it is and I installed it even to couple of people and they also like it.

[–] bear@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like NixOS might be the only distro that could realistically handle all these use cases, but I’m a bit scared of the learning curve and the maintenance work it’d take to migrate everything over.

It's a very steep learning curve, but I personally think it is worth it if what you want is to sync up all your various devices to a single common baseline configuration. I sought a single-distro solution for all of my systems for a long time and always ended up fragmenting them eventually because nothing I tried until NixOS was capable of handling such a diverse set of use cases in a way that would satisfy me.

I am similar to you, in that I regularly use a three server cluster, a gaming desktop, a multi-purpose personal laptop, and a work WSL instance on my work laptop. I still have some purpose-built distros where it makes sense; I use Proxmox for the actual server hosts themselves and then run NixOS VMs on them, along with running VMs for Home Assistant OS and TrueNAS (with the drives passed through, of course). All of these things I could do on raw NixOS (even Home Assistant is packaged in Nix, and there is a project to port Proxmox UI and tooling to NixOS) but I like the stability of the dedicated and battle-tested distros for critical infrastructure, especially for stuff whose configuration is very specific to a given task.

With NixOS, each other device has a consistent shared configuration and package set, they all get updated to the exact same versions thanks to flakes so everything works the same and as expected no matter where I am, and it's all declaratively configured and documented in one spot. Spinning up a new system or rebuilding an existing system is as easy as pulling the config and changing a few relevant lines, and from there it effectively assembles itself from scratch to the exact state I want it to be in. There's never any lingering packages or configuration cruft because the system is assembled from scratch every time it updates. Much of my home configuration is also managed, so aliases, environment variables, even vim configs are consistent across the board and set in one location.

The main downside is resource efficiency. Nix is designed to be reproducible and declarative, not fast or lean. It uses much more storage than a typical package manager, and packages are built with wide compatibility in mind so you often are leaving performance on the table from not using newer instruction sets like CachyOS. You can compile your own packages to fix that part, but that obviously takes a lot of spare processing power. I've been considering setting up my server cluster to do automatic building for me, but haven't gotten around to it yet.

[–] Sunny@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 hours ago

Thanks a lot for the insights. I have dabbled a tiny amoubt with nix so far and while it was steep i do feel like it was doable. I am very likely to fall into the rabbithole again soon, and as you say probably very smart to run proxmox underneath for stability and convince 😊

[–] gblues@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago

Usually I keep everything on Debian, but I've been thinking in making some changes, like running mint on my kids laptops. My rock64 is running armbian, due some problems with latest Debian on it and DietPi on an rpi3. Oh yeah, an rpi4 is running has, due to my absolutely laziness πŸ˜‚

[–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 hours ago

Nah. Debian for servers, Fedora for desktops and Arch for funtimes.

[–] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Slackware on desktop, laptop and mini PC, Debian on anything smaller

[–] Mio@feddit.nu 2 points 7 hours ago

Workstation: Fedora plasma Server: Ubuntu Rock64 Libreelec

[–] cevn@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Fedora on laptop. Fedora on desktop. Fedora in the server. Fedora in WSL.

[–] arcine@jlai.lu 5 points 10 hours ago

I use NixOS on everything ! This way, I can re-use parts of my configuration as a base, and customise only the few things that need to change from one machine to the other.

The only exception is my Steam Deck. I trust Valve on that one, and my usage of it is so different from other computers as to make 95% of my config entirely irrelevant anyway.

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 hours ago

Kind of.

Fedora on workstations. Debian on servers

[–] d3lta19@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 hours ago

No, Arch for laptops/desktops. Debian for servers.

[–] lensflare@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

My home server is on unraid while my other machines are on OpenSuse. Having a webui makes it so much easier for someone other than me to take care of stuff if I'm not around

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 hours ago
[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yes. Mint. Way enough, and I haven't figured out why I should like disto hop yet.

[–] Teppichbrand@feddit.org 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I was like you for many years. From Windows to Mint and never changed. Now I got a second hand laptop from a couple of years ago and put ublue Aurora on it. I REALLY like the experience!

[–] hamsda@feddit.org 2 points 12 hours ago

Ha, I wish I could.

I'm not 100% satisfied, so I'm still searching for the "perfect distro for me", if it even exists.

I have been using Arch Linux on my personal PC and company laptop for 4 years, but I couldn't get some things to work. Things that, after installing Fedora, worked out of the box.

My current setup is:

  • EndeavourOS (e.g. arch linux with a GUI-installer) for my PC at home
  • Fedora Workstation 43 for my company laptop
  • Servers are all running Debian, I'll probably never change that
  • Hypervisor for VMs is Proxmox VE, which is Debian too
[–] one_knight_scripting@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks to hyprland, I've fallen in love with Arch. Sure it works on other distros, but the AUR is great for easy configuration. I'm running it on my container server, my laptop, my gaming rig, and my OneXPlayer(portable gaming rig). That said, I have been eyeing CachyOS because of the kernel optimization plus it seems easier to install.

[–] d3lta19@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

If you already have arch installed, don't worry about how hard it is to install. All done! You can also run the cachyos kennel in arch if you want

[–] one_knight_scripting@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Huh, I didn't realize there was an AUR for it already. It would only take yay -S linux-cachyos.

But I need to fix my btrfs/snapper anyways.

I broke it after reverting by messing up my subvolumes. Swap was not properly setup and somehow reverting also broke my snapshots subvolume.

I also want time to test on my spare laptop first so I can create a script/config for it to deploy to my school laptop and gaming rig. But it's exam week for school and I need to finish transferring a 25TB VM to a hardware server.

I'll mess with it over spring break.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

No, I've got nobara on my gaming rig, batocera on my wife's retro console that's just turned into a kodi device, and proxmox on my server

[–] halyihev@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Currently my primary laptop is on LMDE and my secondary laptop is on GhostBSD just because I wanted to try out BSD. I'm thinking of taking a third laptop and putting EndeavourOS on it. That was my primary OS until an update blew up the EFI partition and I read "yeah, that happens sometimes" and decided my primary system should be a bit more stable than that. But I did really like EndeavourOS other than that. I have an old notebook PC I've thought about putting Haiku-OS on just for fun, if I can figure out what I did with the power cord for it.

[–] exu@feditown.com 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I use Arch (btw) on my desktops and laptops.

On my servers I'm halfway through replacing Debian with openSUSE.

My desktop and servers have different use cases and I interact with them in different ways, so there's little confusion for me.

[–] jhdeval@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

I feel the same way. I use fedora on my laptops and desktops and debian on my servers. Generally my servers do not have or need a gui so debian makes it easy to install without. I tried fedora server once and i just was not happy with it.

[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 18 hours ago

I used to have Ubuntu everywhere, then changed to Debian for servers. Now that I'm using bazzite for my gaming rig, I really liked the idea and went to fedora silver blue on my work laptop. I'm the near future I want to re do my home lab, bit not sure yet what, unfortunately to many open questions concerning storage left.

[–] DarkMetatron@feddit.org 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I use ArchLinux more or less on all Device where it is possible It runs on my workstations, on my NAS, on my servers

Reason for that is: I am lazy and this way I don't have to learn how to administrate different Distributions.

[–] addie@feddit.uk 1 points 15 hours ago

Yep. Arch on my personal multi-use laptop, Arch on my work Java-development laptop, Arch on my gaming PC, Arch on my home Forgejo / DNS / NAS server. Just easier to not have to remember how to do things in different ways, plus my home server can efficiently act as a repo cache.

Did have ALARM installed on the home server back when I used a raspberry pi, and while that's an amazing project, a pi is just a bit underpowered for some uses. Got a mini PC extremely cheap since it wouldn't support Win11, but it runs Linux like a champ.

[–] mikedd@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

I use Fedora on my personal laptop and DietPi on my RaspberryPi 4 where I selfhost a bunch of stuff.

[–] Tywele@piefed.social 3 points 18 hours ago

I use Fedora on my desktop, laptop and server. On my motherβ€˜s laptop I have installed Fedora Kinoite.

[–] retry1203@lemmy.ca 1 points 14 hours ago

My gaming PC runs Nobara so I started using Fedora on my general use desktop and my laptop for consistency. I have an older laptop that runs Debian. I have two server machines that run Proxmox and Debian, and all my VMs are Debian except one that is Fedora server (I read somewhere Fedora would provide better GPU support out of the box, but I've never confirmed this, it just works)

[–] CarstenBoll@feddit.dk 3 points 18 hours ago

I do - more or less. Since I am the IT guy for my entire family and don't feel like doing tech support on 10 different distros.

[–] Scrath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 18 hours ago

I typically use EndeavorOS because I enjoy how well documented and organized the arch wiki is.

I tried switching to fedora on my laptop recently but actually had some issues with software that was apparently only distributed through the AUR or AppImage (which I could have used, I know).

When I also had issues setting up my VPN to my home network again, I caved and restored the disk to a backup I took before attempting the switch. The VPN thing almost definitely wasn't Fedoras fault since I remember running into the same issue on EndeavorOS but after my fix from last time didn't work I was out of patience.

My servers runs either on debian or Ubuntu LTS though.

[–] VOwOxel@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 15 hours ago

I run OpenSuse Tumbleweed on my Daily Driver Desktop, Bazzite on my Laptop, Debian on my Game Server

[–] blxt@lemmy.zip 2 points 18 hours ago

For my Gaming PC I ended up with cashyOS. Justs works and still gives me enough flexibility for customization. Server is Proxmox with mostly Debian LXCs but I started to add in some alpine containers. Probably going to throw alpine on my old laptop as well, just for fun. Ah and then there is my MacBook with macOS, which for now I plan to keep…

[–] g_blob@programming.dev 5 points 22 hours ago

Debian always. Stablility is good, good is stability. But i am open to trying fedora in the near future

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Yep. Debian. I like apt, and I like shit that just....works. Very form after function. So what if a bunch of packages are on "old" versions. They work. The kernel works. KDE Plasma works. I can do everything I want to do without having to constantly be on the bleeding edge. If you prefer newer things, great. I prefer older, proven things. That's also why I drive Toyota cars and Honda motorcycles.

My Proxmox cluster runs...uh...Proxmox, which is based on Debian. NAS runs OMV which runs on top of Debian. Laptops all run Linux Mint Debian Edition, and so does my 5800X3D/7900XTX gaming PC. The only non-Debian machines in my house are my wife's iMac and Macbook Pro, and the Home Assistant mini PC.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 5 points 23 hours ago

For me, I am running EndeavourOS on my laptop (for its rolling release updates and its customisability) and Debian on my homeserver (for its stability). I have also set up a secondary laptop with Linux Mint that is now being used by somebody else for its ease of use :)

[–] M137@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Oooh, look at mr. Rich guy here with multiple devices.

/s.... (not really, cries in only computer being a dying laptop from 2011 with no way to get even just another dying 2011 laptop when this one dies.)

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί