this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
98 points (99.0% liked)

Futurology

4117 readers
123 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lugh@futurology.today 12 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The 2026 Middle East War is likely to be the last in human history where a disruption to fossil fuels means a major global economic impact. By the 2030s, both China and Europe will be well on their way to totally decarbonising their economies, and Chinese manufacturing exports of renewable tech will be doing the same for much of the rest of the world. The age of fossil fuels will be disappearing in the rear-view mirror.

The longer the war goes on, the more renewables win. It will be clear they mean cheap, reliable, clean, and freedom from global instability. Tens of millions of people around the world who have cars to buy in 2026 will be looking at EVs with new appreciation.

[–] gumdrop@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago

I agree! I'm quite hopeful about this because I think the instability in fossil fuel supply has been quite the wake up call for Europe. Time to go big on renewables. Just to be sure, we're cutting it close but it helps to see data that shows that we're headed in the right direction. It's also crazy how much good will I think the Chinese will create in the global south by helping them to electrify reliably, something that can be done very incrementally with solar instead of the "jumpier" more discretized introduction of a massive power plant every so many years.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Finland has built so much wind turbines that in the summer when it's windy and warm electricity is sometimes literally free but in the winter the coldest days are usually also the ones when there's no wind and the prices can get incredibly high. We definitely need more energy storage and - in my opinion - nuclear power.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

We dont'need nuclear, just more batteries

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip -3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Do the math on weeks worth of batteries. Gas turbines run on hydrogen is the only option right now.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago

A combination of solar, wind, geothermal (when possible) and tidal (when possible) should hopefully mean you don't need weeks of batteries.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 0 points 8 hours ago

Well that settles it then.