this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2026
347 points (97.8% liked)

Today I Learned

28762 readers
710 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The only group I know of trying to quantify womens rights internationally as a whole is here: https://giwps.georgetown.edu/the-index/

Iran ranks 140 / 181 which isn't great, but could be a lot worse. Education is a factor, but Iran loses points elsewhere. The most notable item related to this headline is probably employment percentage which sits at 14.8% (Highest in group is Qatar at 65.5%). For negative impact, the reported stats on domestic violence and related items are worth reading into.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Qatar is dubious however, as of their 2.6m population only 300k are citizens and the rest are indentured migrant workers, so naturally there will be a lot of women in “employment”.

Qatar is probably creating some interesting demographics. It is vaguely implied that data is restricted to citizens but can't find where that's directly clarified so who knows. You could compare outside the group with Denmark (The overall #1 spot) at 77.9% or the United States at 71.2% and China at 57.7%.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 14 points 1 week ago

What's it like in Qatar if you remove "domestic workers"?

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

First female fields medal (basically nobel prize for mathematics, huge deal) winner was Iranian too.

[–] Ice@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 week ago

Congratulations on finding the Gender-equality paradox rabbit hole!

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm sure the US will "fix" this "problem" ASAP. See also Afghanistan and Iraq.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Because in the USA it’s discouraged for girls/women to study STEM because it hurts men’s egos. In the 80s the ads for home computers, when home computing started to really take off, tended to focus on how it was a boy activity.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Iranians are some pretty smart people in my experience. Long history of thinkers, I suppose.

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 4 points 1 week ago

Bombing Iranian school girls to increase the comparative amount of educated women in the United states is the exact kind of 5D chess I've come to expect of Americans.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 2 points 1 week ago

If I was a woman trapped in Iranian culture I'd want to go get an education too.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ok, the women stat is neat, great, & impressive, but we all know that.

I was gonna bitch that the per capita stat is bs bcs demography differences (way more boombers per capita in USA & way more young ppl in Iran) & they put it in the title just for clicks - ~~but that doesn't account for all the difference (1 in 346 Iranians vs 1,675 USAians with a doctorate)~~ edit: oh, they are comparing how many are currently actively studying for a doctorate, not how many have attained them.

USA:

Iran:

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Given the gender-equality paradox, this might not be as good a thing as it seems.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Could you expand on that a bit? This gender equality paradox is new to me, and I read it's a disputed finding on worse gender inequalities in nations that are typically perceived as more progressive when it comes to gender equality. Leaving the dispute aside for a bit and assuming this is a straight up observed scientific that's actually real, I don't really see how a larger than expected gender inequality in, say, Denmark, makes higher rates of education in another nation a bad thing. Not saying it isn't, just saying this line of thinking is new to me, and I'm not able to find the link just yet.

[–] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm gonna guess and say that fewer women are in higher education, and the ones that are are progidies. Therefore higher graduation rates for women.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

First of all, why guess?

Secondly, I don't see the link with gender inequality in Denmark.

[–] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not sure why the immediate defense, but I'm just guessing why women have a higher graduation rate. Idk.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Ah sorry, I thought you were the gender equality paradox guy I replied to. I'm quite keen to learn a bit more about it.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 0 points 1 week ago

Mahsa Amini.

[–] aeration1217@lemmy.org -1 points 1 week ago

if it wasn't already a reason for fear, those Christians would be absolutely horrified and in disbelief of such power

[–] vane@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Don't forget that Iran / Persia is ancient civilization, way older than modern western mainstream.

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Ok.

What's your point?