this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
202 points (95.9% liked)

Uplifting News

18345 readers
236 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews (rules), a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news—in text form or otherwise—that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good, from a quality outlet that does not publish bad copies of copies of copies.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 81 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That is a weird-ass way to title and write about a good thing.

[–] Micromot@piefed.social 10 points 3 days ago

It's an issue from the translation

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 55 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Thank fuck this draconian surveillance law didn’t pass.

[–] zout@fedia.io 32 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This time. They'll keep trying, like all the times before.

Edit:

However, the issue is not yet off the table. Despite the failure in committee, the European Parliament's plenary session is expected to address the dossier as early as next week. The LIBE decision is considered an official recommendation for the plenary, but further surprises cannot be ruled out in the charged debate. Proponents of chat control in the Commission and the Council of Ministers, who are seeking an extension of the powers until April 2028, will try to close ranks in the plenary. However, should the failure be confirmed there, voluntary chat control would face a swift end.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

voluntary chat control

Talk about a fucking misnomer! That's like calling house arrest "voluntary location management" 🙄

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I like the expression "voluntold".

[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Well, yes, but also considered that many companies are just implementing invasive identification practices anyway. Discord is just the most recent. It seems to have the added benefit of being an added barrier to market entry for their competitors.

...and out right kills some of those competitors who's business model depends ds on privacy.

We're starting to see more and more of this. These tech companies that used to be innovators and favor a somewhat open internet aren't building for innovation and communication. They're building dependence.

Between Google, Meta, and Microsoft the average user is being locked into a digital gilded cage. Policed by AI with no heavy censorship and no ownership of data.

Yes this law was defeated but the fight is endless, and right now we need to be watching big tech as much as lawmakers.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 3 days ago

It seems to have the added benefit of being an added barrier to market entry for their competitors.

I’m fairly sure the regulations only kick in when the service has something millions monthly active users.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz -2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Well, yes, but also considered that many companies are just implementing invasive identification practices anyway

That's a naive way to frame this. The fact is that many companies implemented invasive identification practices already 10 years ago. These laws are an attempt to bring some democratic control and properly enforced age limits to all of it.

[–] Coolkat@slrpnk.net 21 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

See you next time "europe-wide internet surveillance law" ! Probably packeted with an anti terrorism law this time, who knows ?

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The EU Commission is rotten to the core, hence all the shit that comes from it, from authoritarian measures and bending over to America faster than a speeding bullet to custom-made regulations to benefit specific very large companies with an historic of giving gold plated "consultancy" positions to ex-commissioners.

The EU Parliament, on the other hand, is as Democratic as it get, being elected directly by EU Citizens using Proportional Vote.

So this surprises me not one bit.

[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 days ago

Everyone in Germany knew this Commission would be full of shit the moment Von Der Leyen was somehow cross-promoted to it (she's from the famously corrupt conservative "Christian Democrats", so it's no wonder she was promoted after screwing things up). We dealt with her bullshit for years prior.

[–] LucidNightmare@anarchist.nexus 11 points 3 days ago

Until next month...