this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2026
700 points (98.7% liked)

World News

54313 readers
3810 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The building appears to be among many devastated in Trump’s ‘major combat operations’ as long expected attacks arrive

Iran’s parents had just dropped their children off for class on Saturday morning when they found themselves racing back to school gates, as bombs began to fall across the country in a joint US-Israel attack.

At one elementary school, according to Iran’s state-controlled media, they arrived to find devastation. At least 80 children had been killed in the strike on Shajareh Tayyebeh girls’ school in Minab, southern Iran, the IRNA news agency reported, with dozens more unaccounted for.

In one video circulating on social media, purportedly showing the immediate aftermath of the strike, smoke rises from the burnt-out walls, and debris lies spread across the road. Hundreds of onlookers gathered at the site, some in obvious distress. Screams can be heard in the background. The report of the bombing, its death toll and the video’s source could not immediately be independently verified by the Guardian. Persian factchecking service Factnameh was able to cross-reference the video with other photographs of the school site, and concluded that the video was authentic. Reuters said it had also verified the footage as being from the school.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 1 points 11 minutes ago

I'm sure this won't drive the people of Iran right into the arms of new leader once he is picked. /s

[–] Innerworld@lemmy.world -2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I wanted to upvote this but then saw it already has 666..

[–] dickalan@lemmy.world 1 points 54 minutes ago

yes let's make a meme joke on a serious post what are you like 14

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 19 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Remember when we all condemned Russia for hitting those schools in Ukraine? And, of course, they're still doing it.

I guess not all of us did.

[–] FG_3479@lemmy.world -2 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

At one elementary school, according to Iran’s state-controlled media, they arrived to find devastation. At least 80 children had been killed in the strike on Shajareh Tayyebeh girls’ school in Minab, southern Iran, the IRNA news agency reported, with dozens more unaccounted for.

Why are you believing the state media of an authoritarian extremist state?

[–] nlgranger@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Why are you not quoting the part where they say they cross-checked that the videos were real and the building was correctly identified ?

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Because there is video evidence of it...? I saw a tiny pink backpack with bloody handprints on it as soon as I saw the video of people screaming outside the school

[–] FG_3479@lemmy.world -4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Do you have a link to that video?

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

For anyone else reading this, FG_3479 has other posts promoting deportation and suggesting some immigrants are simply "wired for crime".

I don't think there's any need to engage with someone who has such a clear absence of compassion or humanity.

[–] FG_3479@lemmy.world -2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I do not think you should simply pick random people off the street and deport them.

I think that illegal immigrants should be given a chance to go through the process to become legal, and that process should be cheaper and faster than it is now.

The people I want deported are those such as drug dealers and terrorists.

Also, my "wired for crime" comment was not targeted towards immigrants but instead criminals. It was in a thread about police.

I have said all of this before in a earlier comment:

The people I'm worried about are criminals who are not caught at the border and that the government doesn't know about.

We need to both get rid of them and make the legal routes faster and cheaper to isolate criminals from innocent people.

Currently illegal immigrants should be given a path to legallity if they are willing to provide the documents and have done nothing wrong in both the UK and their home countries.

I hope you understand my views now.

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

No one is illegal on stolen land. The United States has no actual right to exist, and therefore has no actual right to deport people.

Drug dealers are supplying a demand created by citizens and governments have no right to tell people what substances they may or may not put in their own bodies. You address harmful drug use by providing people with a life they don't feel a desperate need to escape from, not by taking anyone's freedom.

I understand your views just as I understood them before. I understand that you're attempting to downplay the murder of children by imperialists and probably have a biased or vested interest in doing so.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

Do you have working eyes?

[–] ambientdread@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Exporting Trump Sponsored Terrorism and GOP war on women and children to the whole world.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 6 hours ago

Well it wouldn't be an Israeli strike without at least one school being blown to bits.

[–] Klox@lemmy.world 202 points 22 hours ago (6 children)

God fucking damnit, so fucking frustrating. Another 30+ years of "terrorists" because people will avenge war crimes committed by the US. This is maddening.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 23 points 14 hours ago

And terrorist attacks on Americans ensures more supposed "strong man" presidents. It's all part of the plan.

[–] scvarii@lemmy.today 17 points 15 hours ago

Yes, this is exactly what I was thinking. All suicide bombers need to do is say "this was for those schoolgirls" and it's kind of hard to disagree with them.

The problem is that the people committing these atrocities face no legal justice, so it's up to vigilantes to do it instead.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 56 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Another 30+ years of “terrorists”

We were never going to hear the end of "Muslim Terrorist" rhetoric, because it was instrumental in justifying our dominion over the region.

There isn't going to be another 9/11. We're well past the point of needing a causa belli for this kind of war. It'll just be ICE goons murdering parents in front of crying children and CNN talking heads explaining how we're safer because of it.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 7 points 13 hours ago

causa belli

It's "casus" belli

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Arancello@aussie.zone 63 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

Israelis and americans expanding and practicing their genocide tactics to see what they can get away with. I dont understand how murdering junior school girls is a legitimate target. Unfortunately western governments are all supporting this despite is blatant illegality. I am ashamed of my government for coming out in support of this. Anthony Albanese is Prime Minister of Australia. Shame on you.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

because the military convinced everyone their bombs are super precise, but in reality they have a 20% hit rate on average where a "hit" is within the radius of 250 yards (~230 meters)

So this could've been a "direct accurate hit", statistically speaking, on the actual target which was as far away as being on the other side of the Golden Gate Bridge or a "very near miss" at a distance of laying the empire state building on its side

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 29 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Americans are so used to school killings that they don't blink an eye at this.

[–] Arancello@aussie.zone 9 points 14 hours ago (5 children)

How can you live with such a callous disregard for childs lives? What has become of your country?

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 11 hours ago

Become?

We're talking about the only UN member that hasn't ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child, because they don't want to have to stop executing children.

Hurting children has always been a core value of the USA, up there with shooting each other, rampant egoism, and their twisted version of christian fundamentalism.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

I wonder how you will feel after you realize you and your allies have been a big part of the American empire, too?

See history of the US dollar and international trade.

Your country likely contributes a significant amount to the US economy, and we go to war together, too.

how do you live with that?

[–] Arancello@aussie.zone 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Ok, so in essence you are saying the person who sold shoes to a murderer is equally guilty of the crime committed?

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (4 children)

No, I'm in essence saying that the person who murders with the murderer is equally guilty of murder.

You should look up who arms Australia, by the way. Can you guess who?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

We live with it by having gun laws which have prevented the rash of mass shootings you've had, and maintaining foreign aid programs to the countries around us, and many further away.

Yes, we trade with you, and China, and Israel, and everyone we can, because trade historically opens up opportunities for diplomacy and allows leverage for achieving human rights goals. We are part of the greater US empire, yes indeed, we've been too close to the US in the past. But when we found that our special forces had killed civilians in Afghanistan, for example, it resulted in national scandal and ongoing reform, inquiry, etc. In the US that's just the norm.

We do not participate in US military actions that may result in civilian deaths. We do not refuel your planes when they do that, for example.

We are sitting over here, trying to be friends, while being ever more horrified with your country and trying to remember the good times.

[–] nile_istic@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

What are your gun laws that have prevented mass shootings? Genuine question.

[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Well, one aspect of the recent mass shooting in Sydney that was remarkable compared to ones in the US or Europe was that the shooters used long guns that could not fire very fast. Australian laws introduced after the Port Arthur massacre focused on preventing rate of fire and ammo capacity, because it literally slows down the rate at which a shooter can kill people, especially in a crowd. We also do not allow handguns, even though we allow quite powerful long arms.

If the Bondi shooters had simple trigger-pull semi-automatic ARs, they would likely have killed a lot more people.

We also have much stricter registration laws, without the loopholes you get in the States, so police generally know who has guns, where they are stored, etc, to a much greater extent, and can check up on gun owners if they want, any time. There are far fewer crazy people with guns, because you can get your license and guns taken away for being crazy, or committing violent crimes, etc.

Now, the advantage we have over the EU and the USA is a harder border to cross, fewer people crossing it, only eight state/territories to worry about, and uniform federal legislation about what guns are allowed. It makes it easier to restrict the supply of easily obtainable illegal weapons.

Sure, criminal gangs can get them, but mass shootings are bad for business, so the loners and freaks who typically do mass shootings can't easily get them.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheLastOfHisName@piefed.social 130 points 21 hours ago (30 children)

Fucker is either murdering kids or raping them.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 58 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Little of column A. Little of column B.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 75 points 22 hours ago (11 children)

What's that thing when people are killed for no real strategic purpose? 🤔

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] liffeyman@lemmy.world 63 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

Pretty sure targeting children's schools breaches the Geneva Convention rules of war. Although Israel will say they're a cover for a military base

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›