this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
737 points (98.6% liked)

memes

20398 readers
1608 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 80 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I catch myself going on socialist rants at the slightest provocation these days so I'm thinking maybe Scully is wrong here

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

what do you think about the craft beer industry consolidation currently going on?

[–] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well I hadn't been up on that one so thanks for giving me another thing to rage about

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

No prob bob.

IPA sucks anyway.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

IPAs used to be good.

Then everyone and their brother started a brewery and every beer became "oops all hops"

The same thing also happened to sour beers.

[–] RustyShackleford@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I hold that IPAs were never good.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

IPA was a marketing gimmick that everyone fell for and gobbled up hook line and sinker.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Who would be stupid enough to fall for that? Looks in fridge full of various IPAs because they're fucking delicious.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

We are both right. But kind of in the "flavored cigarettes" kind of way. I have no idea why someone would downvote you, I wasn't exactly stating a rock solid hypothesis there.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The necessity of the sedentary growing of barley and hops for brewing beer is the only thing that is kind of holding me back from reverting to full on mammoth hunter.

[–] notabot@piefed.social 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I can't help but feel that the general lack of mammouths may also put a bit of a crimp on that plan. Sorry to burst your bubble. Maybe you could diversify a little? Maybe start with squirrels and work your way up?

[–] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Maybe mammoth hunter was a euphemism but I'm still calling you a kink shamer.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

mammothing > gooning

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

Hey look, aim for the stars is what my great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandfather used to say before he ate all the mammoths.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Scully eventually ended up being genuinely wrong most of the time. The show didn't want to drop her "scientific straightman" role as Mulder's foil, but damn the evidence became stacked for the paranormal

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That's one reason why I'm not a fan of the show, it was in a long list of a lot of 90's media that portrayed skeptics as "naive" and "unwilling to accept evidence", and believers as open minded and curious when in reality it's the other way around.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think neither view is accurate really, people who readily believe in the supernatural have been very much been the same kind of person for the last half century, which is that breed of person who doesn't know a lot about science and history and related fields, but will immediately start tying together disparate pieces of evidence to support a pre-conclusion that the answer is supernatural, while more scientific minded people are usually like "It's probably not aliens, but we need to learn more and study more to eliminate everything else first" and are generally very ready to consider the fantastic if they can learn anything about it... it's just that reality is what actually rules it out, not some stuffy adherence to science as a dogma.

This is why I dislike X-files now despite loving it when I was younger, it fed deeply into the uneducated mind that they too can be a "Mulder," casting aside process and "going against the grain" to find the reality that THE MAN doesn't want you to know. It led to a whole ass generation of middle-americans believing in magic oil and horse dewormer, which was one of the many forces that opened the door for massive harm done to our society and collective understanding of objective reality.

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

A big reason I didn't leave spirituality for awhile was, well, I was brought up by media to think of skeptics as close-minded, arrogant, and rude.... And Reddit Atheists don't do much to dispell that notion.

Took awhile to realize, the truth really is not out there.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] tomiant@piefed.social 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I don't get that statement. "I want to believe" kind of implies you don't believe, but you wanna. You wanna, but you fail, or something.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I always took it to mean "I wish I could believe that this is real, it ignites my hope and dreams, but reality is still ruling it out so I have to accept what facts tell me."

Unfortunately, that does not appear to be the message that most people took from it, which if you were to boil down to just its essence in America at least, it says "Believing is just as good as anything else. Go ahead if you want it." and I think it made way, way too many young, impressionable people who never picked up on the irony of the show to go on to accept conspiratorial thinking and self-delusion about utter nonsense.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

Good take. I like that interpretation.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think at its roots its like, you have to be willing to consider things first. You have to start with a willingness to believe.

Or at least thats Mulders MO in the show.

Scully is the scientist, the hard nosed skeptic.

If you haven't watched the show, it actually has aged decently, if its a bit campy.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Brah I'm a golden girl, I watched that shit on release date. :)

Just the poster never made sense. "I believe" would be better. Maybe I'm reading too much into it.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I watched that shit on release date. :

Oh same. Friday nights baby! X-files followed by beyond belief, and I think by unsolved mysteries.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

Hahaha we're old. :(

At least we're from a proper generation. Not like these new whippersnappers with their ipods and their skynets.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Been discovering these x files memes for the first time and loving them

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

The entire fandom:

go on...

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

but they are the good feds. not the bad feds.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Oh Scully, marry me right now you fiendish vixen!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCUklXRaenw

[–] SayJess@piefed.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Some of the guys I work with, defend the oligarchs. You see, my coworkers are temporarily inconvenienced millionaires. They explained that the billionaires earned their money (not through the exploitation of millions of people), therefore they should not have their wealth taxed in a fair manner.

Oh, and also, if you work at McDonalds, you deserve to struggle to make rent. My coworkers had to do it, therefore everyone else should have to do it as well. After all, if you want a better job, just go find a better one? If you don’t have the ability to go back to school, that’s on you. If you are unable to pay rent, you deserve to become homeless. What the hell happened to personal accountability? I’m sorry, I thought this was America.

I can’t deal with their ignorant, racist, views anymore. Their inability to empathize hurts my soul. Everything is money to them. When I mention that we are talking about people, they say “Well who’s going to pay for that? Not me!”.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The percentage of sociopaths involved with creating a society should never be greater than zero.

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

[–] killea@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

'Financial obesity' needs to be a term coined and proliferated into our lexicon. Masses gotta understand this shit somehow,

[–] jimmux@programming.dev 5 points 2 weeks ago

This is the term I've been looking for. Too much wealth is a symptom of serious underlying problems.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

We had a big war over this like 12000 years ago, and the wrong people won. It's hard to argue with institutional greed, it spreads like a cancer. Once you start hoard things, shit will just devolve into mine and thine and war and dynastic hierarchies and royal incest and slavery and shit.

As far as I'm concerned I'd rather be hunting deer on the steppe and deal with the lack of medical care and just take it. Give me something to do, keep myself fit, have some purpose. What the fuck am I talking about? Anyway, we still need someone to make beer though but that can be kept compartmentalized. Like Göbekli! Let's meet once a year at the tepe and drink and fuck ourselves into oblivion, and just accept the natural progression of life. I'm sure we can find some herb or root or some shit for the headaches.

[–] doug@lemmy.today 8 points 2 weeks ago

“Except for your desire to be abducted by aliens. That’s a direct result, probably.”

[–] ianhclark510@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If Mulder was such hot shit why didn’t he catch Epstein

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I know Season 10 wasn’t universally acclaimed, but Kash Patel looks like one of those lizard people that got bit by a human

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 3 points 2 weeks ago

It's never lupus. Except in this case it is lupus.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Late stage capitalism" is not a call to action, it's a call to apathy. It's used by monetized "socialist" influencers to give a permission structure for people to continue buying from their merch stores.

The logic is the failure of capitalism is inevitable so you don't need to do anything. So you may as well buy some swag to signal to others that "you get it". It's the slogan of those that want to fall in line with the "socialist" aesthetic, without thinking about how socialism is just another thing packaged and sold in a capitalist system.

[–] Mentando@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

While they might have co-opted it like such, I cannot imagine this being the origin.

To me "late stage" always sounded akin to late stage cancer, as capitalism is seen.

We, however should not despair in the face of the cancer, but try to heal it.

This does not seem to be the original intention according to Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late_capitalism

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Ok... so why are we in "Late stage capitalism" now, and we weren't in the 1930s? Things were way worse in the 1930s than now.

Perhaps there were some changes in economic policy that fixed the problems then? What reason do we have to believe the solutions that didn't work in the past (ie. communism) will work now, and the solutions that actually did work in the past won't work now?

load more comments
view more: next ›