FCC = fucking, cuck, cunts.
this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2026
265 points (96.5% liked)
AntiTrumpAlliance
1493 readers
401 users here now
About
An alliance among all who oppose Donald Trump's actions, positions, cabinet, supporters, policies, or motives. This alliance includes anyone from the left or the right; anyone from any religion or lack thereof; anyone from any country or state; any man, woman or child.
Rules
-No pro-Trump posts or comments
-No off topic posts
-Be civil
-No trolling
-Follow Lemmy terms of service
Social Media
Other Communities
!desantisthreatensusa@lemmy.world
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Lol, 7.3 million views as of now.
Why link this internet personality instead of the actual video?
To demonstrate the coverage that a relatively milquetoast interview is now getting because of CBS's shenanigans
That interview was anything but milquetoast. I think it's a landmark in terms of dealing with the Christian nationalist belief system. I'm atheist but even I can see that dealing with Christians who've been sold on the Christian nationalist agenda can't be done through the lens of non-religious attitudes.
I think it was a very important interview. "There's nothing Christian about Christian Nationalism" is quite possibly the most effective idea to popularize in national politics. It's self evident to anyone paying attention but that's the thing, many aren't. Democrats should be absolutely hammering this point in an effort to break Trump's hold over cultural Christians but for some reason they have barely even tried that angle.
So many people just go along with what everyone around them is doing but most of them at least want to be good people. A ton of them think Christianity is their path to get there so when they hear that Trump is the Christian candidate that's all it takes. They're not really paying attention to what he's actually doing. If you can drive a wedge between him and that label he's in huge trouble. That's why they're scared of Talarico.
Nice job FCC and CBS, way to Streisand Effect that shit. Talarico is right about one thing, the Trump administration must be really worried that Talarico has a chance to flip Texas.
i think they’re more worried about jasmine crockett so they blew this dude up
I've been following this race since it started and I heartily disagree. I think Talarico's positions are largely to the left of Crockett. He's also better at weaving his policy positions into his life story and creating a hopeful image of the future, and is definitely a better orator.
He's one of the only politicians I know regularly hammering Christian nationalism and oligarchy and who openly condemns what's happening in Gaza. Crockett doesn't talk about any of that. Don't get me wrong, I think Crockett is great, and would vote for her in a heartbeat against most other candidates.
Also, Talarico's been in this race way longer than Crockett, who jumped in after Colin Allred dropped out, so Talarico's campaign in Texas has been much larger than hers from the beginning.
Guy sounded like he was straight up channeling Obama throughout most of his interview with Colbert.
It was kinda creepy, but not in a bad way.
i’m just not jazzed about another christian straight white dude for the senate. diversity is important.
Nope, picking the best candidate regardless of their skin or sex or height or religion or other irrelevant characteristics is the only right choice.
Naturally trends in those categories will tend to adhere to their representation in society. If there are more tall white males pursuing political positions, than the best option will tend to be a tall white male.
And that shouldn't matter.
But... if he's actually to the left of her, isn't that more important that just picking diversity for diversity's sake? Like am I missing something here? If he's actually to the left of her, why should she get the support?
Would she be so far to the right of him that it does damage?
Because it's a question of substance.
The whole point of Affirmative Action was "All things being equal, diversity is better than homogeneity."
Even if he was to the left of her, she's likely to bring up some issues that black women care about and that white men don't even realize are issues.
So yes, if there's a substantive difference between their policies, that should be brought up. But if the things they support are substantially almost the same, there's some validity in the fact that she brings a perspective which is significantly underrepresented.
"All other things being equal" is doing a lot of heavy lifting there. The fact that she took one of those AIPAC affiliate sponsored fealty trips to Israel to tour the iron dome already had her way higher on my shit list on at least that issue even with Talarico still using all that "Israel has a right to defend itself" language and near as I can find has stopped short of calling it a genocide. Talarico at least has enough of a spine according to Drop Site News to call them atrocities and war crimes and supports banning offensive weapons which as far as I can find Crockett doesn't. That seems like a pretty big difference and that's just the first one I found with barely any digging.
You think the troglodites claiming to be Christian for politics actually believe any of it?
You can't be a Christian and modern Republican at the same time, they are wholly incompatible belief systems regardless of what they want to claim.
Of course it's important, but can a black woman win in Texas right now? I don't know a lot about this race but I don't have much faith in average Texans.
I want whoever is more likely to win the seat to run.
A white Christian man denouncing Christian nationalism has a far better chance than a Black Woman in Texas for the foreseeable future.
apparently NETFLIX isnt purchasing CNN along with WB. so its likely ELLISON will have CNN eventually, but not til after the midterms. they really wanted cnn before the midterms.
tl;dw
Post the actual video, not some rando discussing it
I don’t watch CBS or Colbert, so I’d never have known about this if they hadn’t tried to suppress it.
Get wrecked fuckers. I only know this exists because you wanted me to not know. And that’s hilarious.
talirico is a christian, so they kinda are afraid of a "true christian" on the other side and not siding with evangelicals.
Let’s bring back moral integrity into our political candidates. Would love to see Talarico take a run for the presidency in 2032
Why not 2028?
Senate terms are 6 years and I want him to win in Texas first
Fair enough. I had mistakenly thought he was running for the house. In any case, with noting Obama served less than half of his only senate term.
President chairman Chancellor Trump might still be alive and in power by then
If that's the case, we have way bigger issues than who'll run in 2032.
I seriously doubt he will be either.