this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2026
272 points (96.9% liked)

AntiTrumpAlliance

1493 readers
282 users here now

About

An alliance among all who oppose Donald Trump's actions, positions, cabinet, supporters, policies, or motives. This alliance includes anyone from the left or the right; anyone from any religion or lack thereof; anyone from any country or state; any man, woman or child.

Rules

-No pro-Trump posts or comments

-No off topic posts

-Be civil

-No trolling

-Follow Lemmy terms of service

Social Media

Discord

Reddit

Other Communities

!desantisthreatensusa@lemmy.world

!antifascism@midwest.social

!politicus@kbin.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Macchi_the_Slime@piefed.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But... if he's actually to the left of her, isn't that more important that just picking diversity for diversity's sake? Like am I missing something here? If he's actually to the left of her, why should she get the support?

[–] obvs@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Would she be so far to the right of him that it does damage?

Because it's a question of substance.

The whole point of Affirmative Action was "All things being equal, diversity is better than homogeneity."

Even if he was to the left of her, she's likely to bring up some issues that black women care about and that white men don't even realize are issues.

So yes, if there's a substantive difference between their policies, that should be brought up. But if the things they support are substantially almost the same, there's some validity in the fact that she brings a perspective which is significantly underrepresented.

"All other things being equal" is doing a lot of heavy lifting there. The fact that she took one of those AIPAC affiliate sponsored fealty trips to Israel to tour the iron dome already had her way higher on my shit list on at least that issue even with Talarico still using all that "Israel has a right to defend itself" language and near as I can find has stopped short of calling it a genocide. Talarico at least has enough of a spine according to Drop Site News to call them atrocities and war crimes and supports banning offensive weapons which as far as I can find Crockett doesn't. That seems like a pretty big difference and that's just the first one I found with barely any digging.