this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
7 points (100.0% liked)

196

18656 readers
237 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Evangelicals: "Jesus? Who? You mean Paul, right?"

[–] Omgboom@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

Paul who never met Jesus? Yep that Paul

[–] Lyre@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

It's astonishing how pretty much everything distasteful in the new testament comes from Paul. If you took him out you'd lose 70% of the story but it would be so much more palatable as a religious text

[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fucking this. The amount of Evangelicals who cite Paul as if he's CHRIST HIMSELF really fucking boils my piss. I have to stop and tell them "that's not JESUS you're citing, but Paul, try again."

[–] Omgboom@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Part of the mental gymnastics they use to justify putting Paul on the level of Jesus is that the holy spirit (Jesus' gaseous state) was speaking through the apostles.

[–] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

My gaseous state also speaks

[–] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Plenty of Conservatives wouldn't be so terminally angry about women dressing immodestly if they didn't also think that masturbation is wrong. You ought to learn to surf the flow of the horny.

Yeah but you see, to the conservative, it's the woman's fault he's horny so he's going to control the woman.

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Jesus: The rich are sinful, good deeds matter more than identity, people must choose to join us, be good to others.

Supposed followers of Christ's teachings: Yeah, we're gonna listen to like, none of that.

[–] Omega_Man@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I enjoy the super human flexibility necessary to make the eye of the needle parable pro-wealth.

[–] blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io 1 points 1 year ago

And it's not even pro-wealth, at most it's "maybe He meant it's just very very hard instead of impossible". And then pretend it can be ignored.

[–] bl_r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I find it real funny that a food not bombs I used to volunteer at a few years back had no christians in it. Just atheists, pagans, muslims, and jews.

Like, the people who worship Jesus, a person who would love the idea of people making food for the needy, did not participate.

I mean, I might have seen some radical catholics show up if I was living in an area with more catholics, but that wasn’t the case. For whatever reason the only radical (left wing/anti-war) christians I’ve ever met have been deeply catholic.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Paul overwrote all of that. Christ is a mascot, not an actual authority.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Literally Jesus: "Love each other as I have love you".

Conservative Christians: Did this morherfucker command me to hate any single human being for any dumbr reason? I think he did.

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I had a family member once tell me that I have to hate the people that God hates. I don't think so.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

"sure, so no one? since, you know, god is all-loving"

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[27] "You have heard that it was said, `You shall not commit adultery.'
[28] But I say to you that every one who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart.
[29] If your right eye causes you to sin, pluck it out and throw it away; it is better that you lose one of your members than that your whole body be thrown into hell.
[30] And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away; it is better that you lose one of your members than that your whole body go into hell.

Damn I didn't know Jesus was chill like that

[–] hsr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Counter point: literally the next two verses

31 “It was also said, ‘Whoever divorces his wife, let him give her a certificate of divorce.’
32 But I say to you that anyone who divorces his wife, except on the ground of unchastity, causes her to commit adultery; and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.

Not to mention that "adultery in his heart" is essentially thought-crime, which I personally find rather unchill and not based.

[–] match@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago

Thoughtcrime requires crime, which is when punishment is in the control of cops. Jesus says that righteousness should only be self-enforced or God-enforced