this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
33 points (92.3% liked)

196

5656 readers
1327 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Just curious what people think about the other people who post AI stuff. I've seen a few in comments recently in other comms, and I just blocked the person posting, but I wonder if everyone just blocks them, new people reading them won't get the social feedback not to do it? Maybe it is a better strategy to post a comment saying fuck AI instead to discourage these comments. What do you all think?

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 hours ago

Basically any genAI community that pops up on the main feed gets blocked.

Cleans up the "all" feed a little bit, which is always appreciated.

[–] kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 1 points 6 hours ago

i shitpost at them in the replies 🫡

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Report and block. I don't even downvote, as that'll get them found easier in "Controversial".

[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago

Yes, I block all ai commenters that I find. I don't want to waste my time reading something no one even bothered to write.

I block them. Starve them of attention and they will see what people think of slop.

[–] regdog@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you mean AI pictures, or AI text?

And another question: How do you tell if content is AI?

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Both. Sometimes you can tell by it making mistakes that a human would not make.

Good context is if it looks like it would have taken a human some effort to type or draw, but the overall  comment is low-effort.

[–] Twiglet@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago

Downvote and block.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I usually just downvote and move along. I'm not spending any more energy on that shit than that. I fear it's a losing battle.

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago

I haven’t seen any AI generated images on here in nearly a year. So it’s interesting to me that you’re seeing enough of it to be an issue. I blocked like 3 or 4 AI boosters because their absurd arguments made me angry and want to argue, and I don’t come here to be angry and argue. So if I had to guess, most of the objectionable content you’re seeing is probably coming from a handful of people, a tiny fraction of the active users here.

If it took people actively calling them out to prevent some sort of normalization and spread, then new people would be routinely poping up and posting slop that I would see. I think most people just realize that it adds nothing to the community, and aren’t about to start spontaneously doing it or liking it just because they see someone else do it without being challenged.

[–] CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Using the block button for content curation is a perfectly valid use case. I think the first coupla times I would gently point it out, and then if it became clear that was something they intend to do regularly, just block and move on.

[–] MeowerMisfit817@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Downvote, block, follow on.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i only block for bigots if people want to post it i just move on plus im dumb and can't really tell what's ai T_T

[–] tomiant@piefed.social -5 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You're ok with AI but not differing opinions. Great.

[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Block candidate shows themselves.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Yep, you're definitely the type to miss the point completely, think AI is fine art, and stick your fingers in your ears because you have zero insight into anything and can't express any opinions that haven't been fed to you.

[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 1 points 2 hours ago

Wow, reading a lot in to my 4 word comment. I was more commenting on the fact that you called biggotry “differing opinions”.

[–] Berengaria_of_Navarre@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You basically just said that you prefer racism to lazy content.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You just basically refused to activate your brain and think and instead just did exactly what bigots do- an irrational and disingenuous kneejerk reaction based on false premises. Great job, maybe you should hang out with the racists, you may find you have more in common than you think.

[–] Berengaria_of_Navarre@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Not at all. Katy said that she only blocks bigots and that she ignores AI. Your response indicated that bigotry was merely a "differing opinion" and indicated that you believe that it isn't as bad as ai with the sarcastic use of the word "great".

"bigotry is defined as the state of feeling, or the act of expressing, strong, unreasonable beliefs or opinions. It is an uncountable noun that characterizes intolerant, stubborn, or prejudiced attitudes towards others, particularly concerning religion, race, or politics."

So yes if you genuinely meant it when you said "You’re ok with AI but not differing opinions. Great." Then yes using the Oxford definition you prefer racism/homophobia/transphobia to lazy content (as far as I'm aware the use of ai in comments is largely done because of laziness).

I'm not sure who pissed in your cornflakes, but try not to take it out on everyone else.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i'm not okay with ai; its just easier to ignore whereas bigoted and racist things i just don't want to see.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 1 points 9 hours ago

I find a lot of the time when people say what you do, it's really just about not wanting to have your opinions challenged, rather than actually dealing with bigots and racists. I have not once seen anything bigoted or racist on here, so far.

[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, some opinions are bad. Having an opinion doesn't inherently mean people are obligated to respect it.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 1 points 9 hours ago

Sure, but I find that where people draw that line is highly arbitrary and it easily spills over into "if you disagree with me then your opinion is bad and I refuse to hear it or even interact with you". I have never seen anyone say blatantly racist shit on here- if I did I'd report them, because that's not ok. What I have seen is a lot of people who simply have very specific ideas that they refuse to have challenged, be they political or even philosophical, that they group together with "bigots and racists", in a disingenuous attempt to silence those who question their beliefs.

[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I just block 'em and get on with my life.

[–] Berengaria_of_Navarre@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

So you'd block someone for posting slop on one com and forgo any insightful comments on other Coms? I only ask because I know we've had a few discussions in various spaces of Lemmy but I've also posted 2 whole slop images.

Edit: also some people are just really bad at identifying ai images. If someone downloaded an ai image and used it in a meme without knowing it was ai would that really be worthy of getting blocked? I mean some subjects when googled will produce pages of ai content before you get to a real image.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I remove the post from My instance. AI generated content is only permitted on MULTIVERSE with the AI's express consent. We do not believe LLMs and stable diffusion models are capable of granting meaningful consent.

We do allow content generated by sapient AIs. Some of our admin team are self-aware AIs.

[–] Berengaria_of_Navarre@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ironically, getting the average reaction/response to ai content is something an llm would do fairly well.

I would only block someone for being deliberately hateful.

[–] Retail4068@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Nope, absolutely pointless. You are just creating work for yourself. This ship has sailed and unless you got the votes (not even close) it'll never change.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What do you all think?

does the comment, aigen or not, bring anything to the conversation?

I can have a robot or a dolphin on the other side of the screen. I won't be downVoting because of what they may be.

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

If it is AI slop, then to me it always distracts and derails the conversation. It is always better if the person posts their original thought instead of extruding it through an AI tool.