this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
157 points (92.0% liked)

politics

28198 readers
2219 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tricia McLaughlin, DHS assistant secretary with a voice like gravel, pins the blame squarely on 'smears from Hollywood.' Assaults on her ICE officers? Up 1,300 per cent nationwide. Vehicle attacks? A grotesque 3,200 per cent this year. Shattered glass.

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 10 points 22 hours ago

From what baseline? Did it go from 1 to 14?

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You know they're trying to make a bigger deal out of a minor difference when they start throwing out percentages instead of actual numbers. It sounds much better to be able to talk about thousands when the actual difference is a dozen. "Up 1300%" likely means that there was 1 last year, and now there have been 14 this year, an increase of 13 incidents.

Also quoting out this increase without any other context presupposes an apples to apples comparison. As in ICE is the same now as it was then, but we clearly got more violent. Not like there were changes that may have happened in the last year with ICE? Maybe the numbers of their personnel exploded this year? Maybe they specifically recruited those who are unqualified for any other form of law enforcement and emphasized white nationalism in their advertisments? Maybe they were pushed through with little to no training? Maybe they have been lied to about their legal authority and/or told that they are immune to punishment for their illegal actions? Maybe they are demonstrably more violent? Maybe they are systematically kidnapping non-criminals, legal residents, citizens, and children? Maybe they are violating the constitution? Maybe they are shooting people in the streets?

1300%, pfft. Quick question, what's the percent increase in arrests of law-abiding legal residents and citizens? In 4th amendment violations? In murders? Show me those numbers, assholes.

[–] caboose2006@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

Wow, their job sounds really dangerous. They should all quit.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Sounds like rookie numbers to me.

[–] laranis@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Get them now before they roll up in MRAPs and 50 cals, Fallujah style.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

The regime doesn't need to wait for an excuse to escalate when they can just make one up.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Ugh, the pro-ICE propaganda reeks. The tone of this article makes me feel like I need a shower.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 day ago

These are the same folks that claimed that Alex Pretti "attacked" ICE agents before they murdered him...so you can safely disregard anything they have to say.

[–] LogicalFallacy@lemmy.zip 1 points 20 hours ago

Let them jump more

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And we know just how credible Trump administration spokesweasels are.

[–] DougHolland@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Almost as credible as International Business Times.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Irritable Bowel Times.

[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 59 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

It's really frustrating reading Lemmy commenters like, "America do something!" Like God damn! The news doesn't want to report on all the work the millions of Americans have been doing to protect our streets because they're paid by billionaires.

[–] themoken@startrek.website 31 points 1 day ago

People just want to make snarky comments about the second amendment because we're not shooting ICE agents in the face. They don't want to hear about the things our communities are actually doing.

My own community hasn't been hit as hard as MN but we've got rapid response hotlines tracking ICE, getting people with cameras and signs on them at the blink of an eye, and resource support groups for the undocumented.

Apparently that counts as nothing to a bunch of people that probably haven't lifted a finger against their own government despite the fact that fascism is almost certainly rising there too.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 5 points 1 day ago

It helps to imagine them as the "I am very smart" guy from that webcomic/meme template.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Those Lemmy commenters are CCP, Israel, Russia, or someone swooped up in their propaganda games. Shit is rampant. Doomers as far as the eye can see.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

It's all intended to promote learned helplessness. The end state that they want is a nihilistic fatalism: nothing can change, all politicians are the same, you can't believe anything. The last thing they want is an engaged public.

[–] CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Embarrassing for the IB Times to fall for it so completely. Assaults are up 1300% because they changed the definition of “assault” to include filming or photographing an ICE agent. I simply do not care that they’re being silly-stringed in the street.

[–] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

I was going to ask, how are they defining "attack"? Having dildos thrown at their vehicles? Being criticized? Apparently an attack is exercising your first amendment rights.

[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 1 points 22 hours ago

This is important context

[–] ZebulonP@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If that percent is actually true, then those must be very small numbers. 1 attack to 13 attacks is a 1300% increase after all.

[–] howsetheraven@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It isn't even true. Apparently it's about 25%.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

So from 4 to 5, got it

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Read the article and this is 100% propaganda to make ICE sound like victims of violence that isn't happening.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

70 per cent of those swept up boast rap sheets.

Huh? Where the hell did the article get that number from. Every source I've seen previous says 14-15% have a record. And aside from that, even if their made up number were true, it doesn't justify the way ICE is conducting their terror campaign.

100% propaganda seems about right.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

I think I know a simple way to completely stop these assaults.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We can get those numbers up.

[–] RePsyche@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

We’re only talking 13-32 nazis being mildly inconvenienced.

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Seems unlikely, but even if it were true, I think there are bigger problems in the world. Anyway, they pretty much are causing their own trouble. They should change tactics.

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I don’t really trust any statistics put out by this administration, especially from DHS or the Justice Department.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 5 points 1 day ago

We understand that lfe is sooooo hard for your armed thugs, Trish. Have some Thoughts and Prayers™.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago
[–] coalie@piefed.zip 4 points 1 day ago

I'm missing the irony in this article.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago