Why the fuck would it need to be re-passed after already passing?
this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2026
34 points (100.0% liked)
Climate
8314 readers
476 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It was built into the bill. From the article:
The law required another affirmative vote from the legislature before implementation, but lawmakers never voted on the measure.
Choo choo! All aboard the climate collapse train!
Chugga chugga!
But why? Why would you write into a bill that passing the bill isn't really passing the bill and that it needs to be passed again to pass for realsies that time?
Was it was designed to fail? That's such an utterly fucking pointless and stupid thing to do otherwise.
"It took 2 years and nearly 2 million dollars..." Grifters gonna grift.