this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2026
460 points (99.4% liked)

politics

28112 readers
2448 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] idyllic@leminal.space 6 points 3 hours ago

The thing that ppl are not realising that Kash Patel is just a prop. He looks like that, and behaves like that because he can not only not tell he is just a sock puppet, but also because it's Trumps hand inside his ass.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 18 points 11 hours ago

No wonder why he looks like he is staring into headlights.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 23 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

So very many dipshits on the right seem to have really fallen for the completely delusional idea that it was all going to be about the Democrats.

I mean...just how delusional can you be? Have they met the Republican Party?

Also, if these right wing dumbfucks think the average Democratic supporter could give a flying fuck about protecting either Bill or Hillary from any fallout coming their way over this, they are just projecting about how they behave over things like this. Of course, these are the same Einsteins that think "Big Tech" is liberal 🤣 , and because of that, Bill Gates is also someone we are interested in protecting from the law.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

I couldn't care less about any of those folks tbh

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

Big tech is liberal, it’s just that America has been propagandized into thinking liberal means left-wing, when really it has always meant right-wing.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

What? Oh really? You're kidding right? What cover up? He's such an honest man! He never did anything wrong.

This truly is of a 'no shit Sherlock' level. They're not even trying their best to cover things up in secret. It's so obvious and out in the open. Their excuses are complete and utter bullshit and they expect people to believe it. Funny thing is, many still do believe it. Goebbels would be proud.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

They are trying their best. But everyone still willing to be associated Trump are the dumbest people on the planet.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 51 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Just let these people keep lying under oath and then if we can get a mid term election to flip congress, they'd better prosecute the fuck out of all of them.

[–] asg101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 10 hours ago

flip congress, they’d better prosecute the fuck out of all of them.

That would require the "D" faction of the corporate party to develop spines, consciences and morals. If you think that is going to happen, you have slept through the last 50 years of history.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

If I was in the tRUMP circle of corruption (which would never happen because I have decency and morals) I would be asking myself this very very simple but really important question:
Did I get this position/job/etc because I'm good at what I do?

If the answer is an emphatic yes then, hey ho, you're probably safe from that bus wheel heading towards you in slow motion.
If the answer is "Hmmm, yeah...?", then get ready for being thrown under that bus which is careering towards you at astonishing speed.
The fat orange child rapist probably will never see consequences to his thousands of crimes, but other people like that FBI idiot don't have that type of protection.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

which would never happen because I have decency and morals

I would never be in the trump circle of corruption not only because I have decency and morals but also because trump's type of person is just so fucking awful to be around on a personal level. Those people are just so boring and stupid in addition to being evil. If I knew I was going to have to spend the rest of my life only socializing with them -- even if millions of dollars came along with it -- I would just kill myself.

[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 127 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Every single person at the DOJ and FBI involved in this shit needs to lose their job and be thrown in prison.

As a former police officer it is an absolute disgrace that law enforcement agents have so willingly subverted the law to protect paedophiles.

Any decent cop would have gathered evidence of what they were being told to do, resigned and gone public.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago

That's kinda sorta what the chief of police in Palm Beach, Michael Reiter, did when he realized he was getting stonewalled by the county.

First, as was his job, Reiter took the case to the Palm Beach County State Attorney, Barry Krischer, who agreed Epstein would be a great case to prosecute -- then suddenly got cold feet and refused to proceed. When Reiter asked Krischer to remove himself from the case and Krischer didn't, Reiter went over his head and took it to the FBI. That's when Alexander Acosta (Krischer's counterpart at the federal level) stepped in to shut it down.

I don't think people really understand what Reiter was risking to do that, and also later to help the victims with their own cases. Reiter has, of course, since retired.

I'm not a big fan of cops in general but Reiter and the two or three detectives he kept working on this, in spite of the overwhelming political pushback and even the moles in his own office, are absolute heroes.

[–] DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com 3 points 13 hours ago

Don't worry, the DOJ will investigate the FBI, and the FBI will investigate the DOJ, and there will be no wrongdoing found.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Decent cops seem to be in very short supply, not just in the US. What pisses me off most about this shit is that Biden sat on this stuff for four years without doing anything.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

The investigations were open throughout Biden's term: legally Biden could not release them. Trump closed them himself, probably thinking he could keep them hidden anyway, until some congresspeople with spine crossed the aisle to make sure he couldn't.

So if you wanna get pissed off at someone, remember that Epstein remained a repeat, habitual sexual offender against children after his sentence ended. He never stopped offending. He also never stopped visiting his Florida home in Palm Beach.

Guess who was Florida AG from 2011 to 2019 and COULD have done something about him, whose actual job it was to do something about him, but did not? Pam Bondi. Where is your ire for her?

Or for Alexander Acosta, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Florida that worked hand in hand with Alan Dershowitz and the rest of Epstein's attorney's to boil all his crimes down into one offense and give immunity to his unnamed co-conspirators? How has he not made it onto your shit list?

These are not secrets. These people are not hidden. Their roles in keeping Epstein out of jail are well known, and there are others too. But you blame Biden? The ONE guy who legally could not release the files without closing all the related investigations?

I will never understand people who claim to be righteously angry at the exact individuals who had nothing to do with what they're angry about. If it's worth expending the energy of rage on, it's worth learning the bare facts of who is actually responsible.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

So why didn't all these investigations lead to any indictments in four years? You can try to sugarcoat it all you want, but the Biden administration had a chance to clean up the whole pigsty and did absolutely fucking nothing.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 52 minutes ago) (1 children)

So why didn’t all these investigations lead to any indictments in four years?

You're so intent on it all being Biden's personal fault that you are completely ignoring those who are actually guilty. Who needs "sugarcoating" when the truth alone suffices? It had nothing to do with Biden. There's more than enough guilt to go around.

Did you even look up Pam Bondi, or Alexander Acosta? I gave you their names. What about Marie Villefana or Barry Krischer? Do you know who they are? They were the ones who were actually stalling investigations, in part by keeping them open to freeze all the evidence, duh. You act like you have no idea how any of this works -- except Biden, and he's absolutely the only person involved!

There's nothing like the stink of willful ignorance to start a day. It's not a president's job to start, stop, or run criminal investigations. The US Constitution is very clear on this, even if you are not. The executive and judicial are two entirely different branches of government, and presidents until now did NOT interfere in that process. If needed they called on the DoJ to do it, and went through the courts, because running the judicial is not a president's job.

Except Biden! Biden alone is guilty! Biden does everything and nothing, everywhere and at all times, and never! He's like Schroedinger's Satan to you, lol.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 0 points 28 minutes ago

By Biden I mean the Biden administration. He was the head of the administration and he's ultimately responsible for its failures. And I'm very sure such major strategic decisions were run past him. And if they weren't that's even more of a failure.

[–] idyllic@leminal.space -2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You do have a fair point actually.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 2 points 54 minutes ago* (last edited 53 minutes ago) (2 children)

No, he really doesn't. What he has is a willful and profound ignorance of the separations of US government, our constitution, and how until now, no president took it upon himself to throw out the constitutional divisions of government and try to run all three branches, including the judicial, which includes criminal investigation and prosecution at the federal level. Federal, not state.

Biden literally had nothing to do with any of it, except being president at the time.

Why are you so insistent on blaming Biden, the president of the country, for not interfering in state level investigations?

Why are you so intent on looking away from those who were and are actually guilty of stalling investigations and using their positions to protect pedophiles?

Why are you both working so hard to point fingers anywhere except at those who actually worked to cover these crimes and keep them covered, and still are?

You know, it almost seems like you aren't really interested nearly as much in bringing the real perps to justice as you are in playing a game of squirrel to take the blame off of those who are STILL in power and STILL working to cover and defend these crimes.

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 1 points 38 minutes ago

"hey guys, I know we're saying that Trump is an existential threat to the US, but leaking documents to stop him would violate norms. So we won't. We'll just blame the left when we lose."

[–] idyllic@leminal.space 1 points 40 minutes ago* (last edited 36 minutes ago)

You misunderstood me. I am not the least blaming Biden government for being complicit and not releasing the files. What I am saying is that they could have expedited the process knowing that there is a looming danger of Trump becoming the president and doing all the fuckery he is doing right about know.

I absolutely know that his hands were tied, and that his regime was too ethical to not interfere in the matter. They could have been less so - so that justice could have been served. But, yes - that would have punched holes in litigating the wrong doers, and probably could have gotten off on technicalities.

I guess - damned if you do, damned if you don't.

[–] idyllic@leminal.space 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 33 minutes ago)

Maybe Trump wanted to become the President so bad this time because he knew that the investigation was closing in on him. He was probably also egged on and helped by his other powerful bedfellows because they knew that Trump was their only chance.

But the Biden government should have put all the foot to the pedal knowing this! God, what a missed opportunity for America to see Kamala Harris as their President. No joke, American missed its wonderful opportunity and so did the world.

[–] 5oap10116@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago

I bet the evidence was purposely gathered in a way that it wouldn't be admissible I court.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Seriously, why does every picture of cocaine kash look like he’s rocking a an entire drug bust’s worth of meth?

[–] M137@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I saw someone say "he looks like what a normal person would look like after they've read all of the unredacted epstein files and watched all the uncensored videos."

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

not enough machetes/hatchets/flamethrowers and general anger for that.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He looks like the guy who is smuggling a condom full of heroin up his ass and the condom just broke.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

RFK told him it’d be okay. And he’s an expert!

[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 4 points 19 hours ago

Shouldn't have trusted those tRump branded condoms, I guess!

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's a perennially uncomfortable weird sonofabitch

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm glad he's uncomfortable. he makes everyone around even less comfortable.

[–] idyllic@leminal.space 1 points 3 hours ago

Awesome take.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 5 points 19 hours ago

You mean Kash 'brown enough to take the fall' Patel? Sure you saw this comming when Trump named him, right?

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Take his head MAGA. He lied to you.

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

nah, he gets a pass for owning the libs so hard.

really tho, have the chickens forgotten how to come home to roost?

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

The foxes that are guarding it keep eating them in the way in.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sadly they got it wrong, he isn't part of a cover up, he leads it

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That’s the face of a guy who couldn’t lead a marching band, let alone an alphabet agency

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

His job is to destroy the organisation he leads, just like the other Trump appointees.