this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
458 points (99.4% liked)

politics

28091 readers
2635 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Threat of stationing immigration agents around voting locations has become a concern as it can be a deterrent to legal residents of color who are concerned they may be harassed by federal agents

The White House refused to rule out following through on the threat of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents being sent out to “surround the polls” when voters cast ballots in this November’s midterm elections as a way of depressing Democratic turnout and boosting chances of Republican victories in the House of Representatives and Senate.

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on Thursday said she could offer “no guarantee” that ICE personnel would not be stationed at polling sites when Americans are in the process of choosing whether to extend the Republican stranglehold on power at both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue.

She had been asked about former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon’s recent call for Trump to deploy ICE around election sites on his War Room podcast on Tuesday, just days after Trump himself called for a Republican “takeover” of vote-counting in Democratic-led states and municipalities.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How the fuck did we get to a point where it's normal for the government to say these things?

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Conservatives stopped respecting our Constitution and our nation as a whole.

But they're pretty good at showing up to vote, unlike many other Americans. That, combined with our electoral system being a joke and designed to allow a minority to have control, and you've got our current situation.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well I guess we’re going to be exercising our second amendment rights because that’s tyranny.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can't guarantee I won't communicate with my community to show up to the polling stations with a large group of armed citizens to ensure we can vote safely without the interference of terrorists.

Doesn't stop them from ratfucking the votes after they're submitted, but hey, gotta do what we can.

[–] itistime@infosec.pub 2 points 1 day ago

I hear ya, but consider that will make a VERY tense situation that will likely deter voters from engaging.

[–] itistime@infosec.pub 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Gear up, the hopefools will learn too late.

[–] BigTuffAl@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why is she so obsessed with getting ICE agents killed?

[–] DronePirate@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] BigTuffAl@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Escalate how? They don't hold the flyover sovereign and they are actively losing control of territory. Their navy is spent and overspending, the national guard has its fucking jugular hanging open in every small town, and they're about to commit the army to Iran. If all they have is ICE and CPB they are going to have a very bad time.

[–] Biffsbraincell@lemmy.zip 34 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Republicans have stolen every presidential election they've won since 2000. There haven't been consequences yet, and the future won't be any different unless we stand up.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They tried damn hard to steal the ones they lost as well, and know that because of the last year they may not get voted for, for another couple decades. They know they can't win, so they are abandoning democracy.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 92 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The very act of floating this idea is election fraud. Even if they don't do it, threatening to do it could discourage voters.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We can offer no guarantee that democrat voters won't be harmed, detained or even murdered while voting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 108 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Democratic leadership is sleepwalking us into a permanent state of authoritarian rule.

[–] French75@slrpnk.net 32 points 2 days ago

That's not fair. They are still working super hard to disarm the people in blue states.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago

That's atrocious.

[–] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Thats not a warning intended to keep the public safe, it's a threat intended to get the public to give up on democracy

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 62 points 2 days ago (1 children)

When Obama ran, local organizations rented vans and escorted people to and from polls.

We can do it again if needed.

[–] digredior@lemmynsfw.com 20 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Honestly, idk why it stopped. That shit enables better voter turnout…

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works 41 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Obviously.

This is obviously where it was going.

From day one, from the first lie, to the arming of his own private army, this has been the goal. Obviously.

Americans will be surprised, of course. As always.

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

"Back when it was step 3, all the alarmists were warning me about how bad step 10 will be. Now that we're at step 7, the logical thing to do is continue to accuse people of being alarmist."

  • 9 out of 10 Americans (real Americans)
[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Americans will be surprised, of course. As always.

No one's accused Americans of being smart.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Every voter come armed.

[–] AccoSpoot@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Can't guarantee that antifa won't be around polling locations...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Fucking brown shirts

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Oh no what happens if ICE agents around polling locations are shot dead.

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Everyone else at the polling place leaves and probably doesn't come back.

Polling location(maybe others) are now closed for public safety from the radical left Democrats.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I got PTO, i don't mind protecting people and staying at the voting place all day to protect them from the ICE thugs taking them to a concentration camp.

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Problem is people won't show if they fear ICE will attest yhem, even if they are citizens as ICE has already proven.

Its intimidation

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It can't be guaranteed that an ICE jackass won't be shipped to the local junkyard.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Saljid@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is what Hitler's SA did, so that's to be totally expected.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

Let everyone you know that mail-in ballots are still an option... but educate them that they must bring the ballot to the post office IN PERSON, and ask the postal staff to post-mark it IN FRONT OF THEM. I have read (please correct me if I'm wrong!) that works around the recent regulation change that allows dropped-off post to be stamped when it's delivered, instead of when it's first dropped off, which is a rat-fucking tactic to increase the likelihood of ballots being marked late, knowing they'll probably take many days from drop-off to delivery.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Prominent Republicans have been saying this kind of thing, in various ways, since at least the 1980s. If people want to delude themselves and call standard Republican stuff "trumpism" or even more incoherent and nebulous things like "maga", I don't know what to tell them. This is stock conservative/Republican stuff.

This is Paul Weyrich in 1980:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GBAsFwPglw

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Can you imagine getting abducted when you try to vote? Now you don't have to!

I am sure this will help the voter turnout and is definitely not a thinly veiled threat meant to cause voter suppression.

load more comments
view more: next ›