this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
318 points (98.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

67247 readers
255 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 8 points 12 hours ago

spotify and major music labels should be sued for 13 trillion

[–] Lorka@feddit.dk 25 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

AI have made pirating legal, as long as you are not pirating for personal enjoyment. Isn’t that the defence the AI companies have used successfully?

Its just tribal politics.

While authority exists, everything it can touch is tribal politics and bullshit abstraction layers on top of them. Literally everything.

And terrorism. Tribal politics and terrorism.

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 3 points 15 hours ago
[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

May all lawyers involved die in the most horrible way possible. Actually scratch that, May all corporate lawyers regardless of involvement die in the most horrible way possible. ☺️

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 15 hours ago

Change is about the only thing I got because of corporate greed

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 54 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Apparently it's legal and acceptable to demand, through a court, enough money to destroy the world economy.

Seriously, if I were the judge I'd throw out the lawsuit until they come up with a remotely realistic number. As it is, it makes the whole lawsuit look like a joke.

The gratuitous vulgar nonsense of it is the point. Its LBJ slapping his cock on the desk during a serious meeting to drive home that you cant fucking stop him

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 15 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The whole lawsuit is a joke.

And it should be permanently thrown out and not seen again because of how unserious that number is.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 86 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Is this the music industry asking for more than all the money in the world again?

Yes, I did say again.

Who is going to stop them? You?

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 day ago

LINE MUST GO UP. ANY LINE ACTUALLY. WE'RE FUCKIN DESPERATE.

  • Businesses everywhere
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well, more along the lines of 10% of all the worlds money.

... very reasonable indeed 😜

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sefra1@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How do you even sue a shadow library? Aren't they like, behind 7 proxies?

You make an effort to contact the defended and bring the lawsuit to a judge. I don't think the court will grant the 13 billions judgement, that's a fantasy number but I don't think they will throw out the lawsuit either.

Ans since Anna's Archive won't show up in court Spotify will probably receive a default judgement which they can fold and shove up their ass.

They are probably going after companies affiliated with Anna's Archive next, like especially hosting providers.

[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago

Plus, they're using the neighbour's internet!
Checkmate, spotify!

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 50 points 1 day ago (2 children)

we have stood with the artist community against piracy

Correct me if I'm wrong, but Anna's archive is not giving you song downloads, but rather metadata

over a massive music data scrape

So when are you going to sue AI companies?

sue companies

I don't understand. This sentence does not parse. Thats like sending an email to the legal department of my kidneys.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but Anna's archive is not giving you song downloads, but rather metadata

200gb meta, 300tb music. Just 300tb not released yet. Might be, might not.

So when are you going to sue AI companies?

I think some sue suno and settle for money. And GEMA (germany) sue openai for songtext.

[–] Min3r@kitty.ly 21 points 1 day ago

They're gonna shit when they find out about yt-dlp

[–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 day ago

13 fantastillion dollars

[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Spotify doesn't even have that much net worth how the hell one can steal more than that anyway? Also this isn't even stealing just a digital copy sent by spotify servers

[–] rbn@sopuli.xyz 4 points 17 hours ago

Spotify doesn't even have that much net worth how the hell one can steal more than that anyway?

Because it was stolen already. By Anna's archive. Isn't that obvious!?

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Probably theorizing every potential peer is pulling the whole archive.
So net worth * 100.000 potential peers = $$$

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Perhaps Anna can pay them off with theoretical potential money too? Like, a big collection of monkey NFTs.

[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Or exposure.

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 63 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Weird, I wasn't aware that Spotify OWNED this music. I'm fairly certain they they only license it.

[–] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 9 points 18 hours ago

Spotify and Major Music Labels

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I guess if I were an artist I'd look at this and feel justified suing Spotify for 1 billion dollars for the lack of protection of my music.

[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I assume any contracts detailing the guarantees of Spotify's DRM are clear that it's not Fail-Safe.

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

A hole that allowed people to download songs and one that allowed someone to download the entire collection are two different things.

[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 1 points 4 hours ago

I assume they were literally the same mechanism, but AA just did it distributed across many accounts.

load more comments
view more: next ›