this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
919 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

80267 readers
3633 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 13 points 12 hours ago

know who never pushed AI?

Linux.

know who has fixes or useful community support?

Linux.

know who doesn't scan your desktop every second to scrape your data?

Linux.

know who has the audacity to provide a free product and still doesn't sell your identity to the lowest bidders?

Linux.

holy shit, it's almost like Linux is the OS by the people for the people...

[–] klymilark@herbicide.fallcounty.omg.lol 19 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Remember: Companies don't learn lessons, they react to profits. They're 100% gonna boil the frog here.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 24 minutes ago

They already did with 10. At this point even a funny smell is gonna rumble 'em

[–] kcseb@pawb.social 13 points 18 hours ago

and this is why I use Linux. No forced AI nonsense being shoved down my neck.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 19 points 23 hours ago

i don’t believe it and am no longer giving them the chance to allow me to see it.

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think the best way to turn people on to Linux is to give them a bootable live USB, so they can try it out. Otherwise, they have no basis for comparison.

Too many people just accept whatever Microsoft gives them, shrug and think, "Well, I guess this is just the way computers are."

[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 5 points 22 hours ago

The best way from my perspective is to show them.

At tech events and meetups, I'm showing them Linux.

When my friends come over, I show them my self hosted solutions on a Linux.

At work, where we use Macs, we talk about open-source, including Linux.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 3 points 23 hours ago

I like the idea, but unfortunately most PCs don't boot from USB out of the box. It requires a few easy steps, but this might just be enough for a lot of people not to try it.

[–] Lulzagna@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Microsoft hasn't made a decent OS since Windows 7, why would they start now?

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Agreed. 2000 was fantastic, but that was 9 years before 7. Its been 17 years since 7.

[–] Lulzagna@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

XP is still good! still the only windows version that's reverse compatible with DOS.

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

People have too much rose tinted vision about 7, it really wasn't that great. I don't see anything it does better than w11, and if you have modern hardware (I mean like 2015+) your computer is being held back by w7. Sure it's technically more light weight but it lacks support for modern hardware and any modern computer will by choked by w7 where w11 or Linux would run significantly better.

[–] Lulzagna@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

If you think that Windows 7 was overrated, you're naive and completely oblivious to the state of Windows during that era. XP came out in 2001 and Vista in 2007, during a time personal computer improvements were exploding. That'd be like 20 years nowadays. Vista was a bloated and slow mess that even modern hardware could barely run efficiently. Windows 7 righted the wrongs and made massive performance improvements that Vista lacked, and not just for modern hardware at the time, but legacy hardware was revived.

Arguing that Windows 7 doesn't support modern hardware is so asinine and a straw-man argument. No one was making an argument that Windows 7 is a good OS today, not a single person. What we are arguing is that every OS since 7 has been a half-baked mess with tons of bugs and annoyances.

"I don't see anything it does better than w11". You think the lack of unified interface is equal to windows 7? You think the disaster of a start menu is equal to windows 7? You think forced updates is better? You think the abundance of telemetry is better?

Honestly, have you even used Windows 7?

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world -2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Ok but windows didn't make a good os with windows 7. Everybody thinks 7 was so grand because after years of updates they un fucked it enough to be good. Do u remember being stuck 2/3rds of the way in a w7 install for eternity? It simply not taking and having to start over? For the first 2 years I swear to God you couldn't use any printer with it. We kept a vista computer around because it fucking worked better till the 7 bugs got worked out. Windows 11 is now 4 years old, and I'd argue as solid as w7 was at that age too (if we look past the shoving unneeded crap down your throat bit that all can be disabled if you'd bother). I don't remember the early days of vista as that's what I grew up on, but early w7 days were rough too. I'm just trying to say that I don't remember a non half baked os being released from windows, not sure what you think im trying to straw man here.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 21 minutes ago* (last edited 19 minutes ago)

Yeah nah mate i do not recall a single issue you're citing here. And i was literally sysadmin for a uni rolling it out at the time.

Sure, in some cases you had to do a little more driver work as they cut the "must natively contain drivers for fucking everything" mindset that caused XP to have such a massive footprint, but they were easy to install after the fact

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

God I still remember how many people still screamed about Windows 7 and getting rid of XP. You can definitely tell the age of people based off of what Windows OS they claim is best.

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

For real I cut my teeth on vista and grew up largely with w7, I can't hold 7 on a pedestal though.

[–] Royy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I'm a bit confused by your criticism. Windows 7 came out in 2009, Windows 8 came out in 2012. And your criticism of Windows 7 is that it doesn't run great with modern hardware? Microsoft not optimizing an old operating system for new hardware when it's focusing on a new version, to me, isn't a reflection on the quality or design of the old operating system. To me that's like criticizing DOS for being limited to 640kb of memory. It was designed for the hardware available at the time.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's a threshold that you pass and once you do there's no going back because the trust is lost forever and customers will go the next chance they get.

It looks like this is finally the point we might have reached with windows.

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Strider@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Yes that, thanks!

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 7 points 1 day ago

No they aren't. They don't care.

[–] starblursd@lemmy.zip 195 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Too little to late.. I already left and fell in love with Linux

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] sommerset@thelemmy.club 27 points 1 day ago (12 children)

What sucks is - windows is the easiest to jump off. There are tons of viable alternatives.

There is nothing for mobile.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

For mobile I can't recommend Graphene enough. Freedom from Google with no draw backs.

Assuming you have self control about keeping shite apps off your mobile, fastest and most private option there is.

[–] MoffKalast@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

I'd get on graphene in a second if they supported more than one phone, and I'm not buying a damn Pixel alright. Google if you don't and Google if you do.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] MoffKalast@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yeah I've heard of that, but so far it's just rumours. Hopefully it ends up being something reasonable.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 1 points 54 minutes ago

100% with you there. Would enable the less nerdy people to benefit.

[–] httperror418@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Only thing holding me back is game companies not empowering stuff like battlefield

I daily drive Linux for work, just use windows to play some games in the evening

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›