this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2026
676 points (98.6% liked)

politics

27302 readers
2552 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] boolean_sledgehammer@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What we need is the complete eradication of all government staff appointed by or associated with the Trump administration. Every Republican who voted with him, every Democrat who did the same.

Once that is done, a Manhattan Project sized initiative of judicial reprisal is enacted towards every single person who enabled the Trump administration. The Heritage Foundation is raided and staff is brought up on charges of insurrection. Fox News and the entirety of the right wing noise machine starts facing hard legal, financially devastating consequences for deliberately lying to the public. They, and all other news outlets are kept on a short leash until the heat death of the fucking universe. Corporate personhood is revoked, corporate lobbying is made illegal, and billionaires are taxed until they are brought to heel.

None of this will matter until the people responsible are fleeing for their lives.

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Be careful hitting them too hard in the pockets as it could have pre-WW2 type economic effects amongst hundred of thousands of people who could get really violent and try to overthrow the government (again)

Just guillotine em and be done with it.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Couldn't the newly raised tax revenue be used by the government to prop up the economy and mitigate the effects? I'm admittedly not particularly familiar with the effects you mention, nor how they came about.

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's more so that the economic devastation of hyperinflation after WW1 created a very angry population, and that pushed a lot of people into the arms of the nazis.

My comment was more of a facetious take that the people should just put the wealthy elite 6 feet under, so we dont have to worry about them using their connections to get revenge.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

You make a convincing point

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 285 points 4 days ago (11 children)

it's tiresome seeing all these "tHaT wAs ThE lAsT sTrAw" headlines for years and years, while he just keeps doing whatever tf bullshit he wants with zero consequence

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 78 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well, THIS is the last straw for real now!

Source: trust me bro.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago

Well if he's not careful, he might get SLAMMED.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (11 children)

It’s almost like the American “resistance” is a bunch of fucking cowards.

“But I have a family! But I have a job”

Go fuck yourself, so did literally everyone else who ever fought against great odds, you absolute clown.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 9 points 3 days ago

All while still being very proud that "they" did something in ww2

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Most people subconsciously know that they would get Charlie Kirk'd five minutes into their career as resistance fighters.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Maybe you muppets shouldn’t have dined out on “give me liberty or give me death” for two centuries if you just thought it sounded cool but didn’t really mean it.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 days ago

The camel's back is vibranium

[–] nocteb@feddit.org 6 points 3 days ago

It's all a conspiracy by BigStraw

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Areldyb@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm not a lawyer, but anyone saying "it's time for the 25th amendment" doesn't know shit about the 25th amendment. Here's the text of section 4, which is the part that allows the president to be ~~removed from office~~ disempowered (I guess technically he'd still hold the office, I already said I'm not a lawyer):

Section 4.

Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.

Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.

If you're illiterate or allergic to Constitution-speak, that means that the VP and a bunch of Cabinet members can get together and say "he can't do the job, he's not the President anymore", but the President can just say "yes I can and yes I am" and it doesn't count. If they really want to fight over it, it goes to Congress to decide, and if Congress wanted to get rid of Trump they would have already.

It's not a viable option, and anyone telling you it is is badly misinformed at best.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Will never happen, the Republicans would have to admit all his executive orders are tainted. They kept Reagan's dementia quiet for 2 years.

Regan wasn't constantly posting on trump social and refusing to listen to his handlers.

Not saying that repubes will do anything but what they've already done, just that it's much harder for them to keep the dimentiadon quiet than it was Regan.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 24 points 3 days ago

If they ever remove this ass from office, it will probably just be the final compromise to somehow still not release the epstein files.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We've been here before so many times. France is the only country with any mettle. The rest of Europe is going to wail about "not escalating things" and there will go Greenland, and effectively NATO, which is just what... huh which country wants that gone again? Surely not a country that has been shown to manipulate Trump.

[–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Problem is that if it would get to war, trump and his loonies stay in power because of a ongoing war and crisis state. Not escalating things is very important to do.

However, that does not mean we can not support greenland if it would come to him invading. We just shouldnt push him to go there.
Also, if anything, its america that should fix america. Not the rest of the world

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 140 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (13 children)

Sigh. I keep reminding people that the 25th Amendment was not meant for this. It was meant for when a President is physically incapacitated. Like, if a President was shot in the head, and is still alive, but in a coma. Because all the President has to do is say "Naw, I'm good", and he gets his office back. If the VP and Cabinet still agree, it takes a 2/3 majority of both Houses to make the expulsion stick. And even then, the VP carries in as "Acting President", which is not formally defined anywhere.

Impeachment is the way to handle this. It has a lower threshold. It doesn't require the VP or Cabinet to sign off first, and only needs 1/2 the House to start the process. And once the President is removed from office by 2/3 of the Senate, the VP becomes the actual President, no "acting" involved.

[–] m4xie@lemmy.ca 53 points 4 days ago (9 children)

What is impeachment usually meant to do? Because he's been impeached twice and here he is.

[–] Klox@lemmy.world 63 points 4 days ago

Colloquially it is also meant to include conviction by the Senate. Impeach + convict. But yes, Republicans have been assholes for many decades. It still needs to happen though, so it is what continues to get demanded.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 42 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Impeachment is meant as a check on an Imperial Presidency. In the Constitution, it is supposed to be triggered in response to "High Crimes and Misdemeanors". It leaves to Congress what that means. So it does not have to be a chargeable crime. The President is supposed to uphold the Constitution, and Treaties like the NATO treaty are supposed to have the same force as the Constitution. Threatening to attack our allies should count as impeachable.

However, he has been impeached twice and failed because Republicans in Congress have his back. In particular, the second time around McConnell said that Trump deserved punishment, but it was better done in the courts. Then Surprise! the Courts said the only way to hold a sitting President to account was through impeachment. It was an ouroborous of letting him off the hook.

We may have to live with the fact that there is no way to fix this, other than voters (or God Himself) intervening, as long as Republicans are too chickenshit to stand up to Trump.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Because all the President has to do is say "Naw, I'm good"

Or, historically, his wife claims he's good, but can't speak to anyone directly, so she would talk with him away from everyone and come back with his feedback.

I predict Stephen Miller would be the one to assume that role this time.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 days ago

It was meant for when a President is physically incapacitated.

Dementia is physical incapacitation.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (8 children)

It never says physically incapacitated at all. It says:

"unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office"

If the president has a stroke and becomes a psychotic menace. Nervous breakdown and won't leave his room...all sorts of things.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Blah, blah, blah.

Just like last time, no one did anything and this time will be no different.

The blind allegiance to power is too strong.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago

The problem is the world became to reliant on one country. I hope this means it won't happen again. But it well cause money consolidates.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

Dude defunded NPR and they still bootlick nonstop. The indoctrination is deep.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 38 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think its time for the second ammendment if you ask me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (10 children)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] C1pher@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

How will transferring power to the JVance help?

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 2 days ago

He's not demented. Trump is not planing beyond the next week. Soon he will start threatening countries will nukes and demanding payment directly to his personal bank account. Vance will be equally evil but you avoid the risk of him nuking someone in the middle of the night because of what he read on Truth Social.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

No one gives a shit about Vance.

[–] gointhefridge@lemmy.zip 42 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It’s obviously not that critical cause they make you pay to read it.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 29 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Trump sent ~~Denmark~~ Norway a letter claiming they owe him Greenland for him not getting the Nobel Peace prize.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

dude makes enemies everywhere. bonkers.

[–] seerdomin1983@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

American democracy is a sham. Too many influencers and voters that are too easily influenced.

[–] ClownStatue@piefed.social 37 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Archive link

TL;DR: The US president is the walking talking definition of "Main Character Syndrome" (because he is quite possibly the biggest narcissist in recorded history). Because of this, he is risking the dissolution of NATO, and a possible global conflict, seemingly because Norway did not give him a medal. His letter to the Norway PM below:

Dear Jonas,

Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America. Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China, and why do they have a ‘right of ownership’ anyway? There are no written documents, it’s only that a boat landed there hundreds of years ago, but we had boats landing there, also. I have done more for NATO than any other person since its founding, and now, NATO should do something for the United States. The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland. Thank you! President DJT.

[–] ClownStatue@piefed.social 25 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Adding the following:

We have debated the extent to which we can call these claims “lies” because the president truly seems to believe many of them.

This, to me, is probably the scariest thing. I told my wife awhile back that the difference between people like Mitch McConnell and MTG was that McConnell knew he was pedaling bullshit to get what he wanted. He just didn't have any ethics. MTG (and Boebert, maybe Gym Jordan, and certainly Trump and plenty more) genuinely think that bullshit is true.

When that guy showed up looking for the child hostages at that DC area pizza place w/ his AR-15 and found out the place had no basement , McConnell privately laughed at the idiot people like him had created. The MTGs of the world figured he just had the wrong pizza place, but went on believing that prominent Democrats were harvesting the blood of children! If enough people like that get in charge of a country like the US, then all bets are truly off. That's not hyperbole. They are the kind of people who can be convinced that a country can win a nuclear war, because God would be on their side.

I'm not saying we're headed for a nuclear confrontation. It would have to be a means to an end for someone who can convince the President of the need to achieve that end, and I can't think of any billionaires who need a nuclear war. Yet. Still, it's important to recall that this president did once consider nuking a hurricane. I'm sure anyone on the right, and many on the left, will say he was just kidding. But looking at the context of that conversation, I don't know if that assessment is fully accurate.

Edit: formatting, grammar

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

25th time someone says we should use the 25th amendment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 5 points 2 days ago

Who's the next scapegoat puppet they have lined up?

load more comments
view more: next ›