this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2026
894 points (98.7% liked)
Political Humor
1941 readers
188 users here now
Welcome to Political Humor!
Rules:
- Be excellent to each other.
- No harassment.
- No sexism, racism or bigotry.
- All arguments should be made in good faith.
- No misinformation. Be prepared to back up your factual claims with evidence.
- All posts should relate to politics and be of a humorous nature.
- No bots, spam or self-promotion.
- If you want to run a bot, ask first.
- Site wide rules apply.
- Have fun.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Safelite repair, Safelite replace.
He has a vague resemblance of Luigi
I don't see it. Luigi never touched a firearm in his life
This is why I think a bunch of the ICE harassment is in Minneapolis right now. A city where no open carry is allowed.
Yup
Open carry of handguns is allowed with a permit, and Minnesota is a "shall issue" state, so it's easy to get a permit.
Correct for Minnesota, but Minneapolis has city ordinances that outlaws it.
Ironic that Democratic policies are hurting Democrats.
Fuck the dems, we need an actual pro-gun leftist party.
I always tell people when you get far enough left you end up back in the pro gun camp.
Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary
- Karl Marx
I always describe myself as an "under no pretext" gun supporter rather than a "shall not be infringed" supporter.
load more comments
(6 replies)
Note that the one at the top is a non-resident of the area coming in from somewhere else to protect property from people
And the one at the bottom is a chapter of locals protecting people from federal agents
That’s the story he told to escape justice.
He actually went to murder people.
This illustrates a point in legal discussions that I don’t think lawmakers consider. “What would your opponent do with these powers?” If they did, there would never be an escalation of authority.
It's why I await a new Democratic president with the authority from the Supreme Court to have full immunity.
As if a Dem would actually use that authority to enact progressive legislation…
Or hold fascists accountable
What are you talking about? They wagged their finger and wrote strongly worded letters.
Biden had that and did nothing with it
The SCROTUS decides what qualifies. If Republican SCROTUS, Republican president is fine to do whatever and a Democrat one is not. If Democrat SCOTUS, they will say the president does not have immunity regardless of political party. So only Republican presidents will ever benefit from it.
Ding ding ding, we have a winner!
So you can be disappointed for 48 consecutive months while they use that power to entrench fascism?
Democratic leadership just negotiated more money for ICE in the latest funding resolution.
There may be an ok democrat here and there, but the core of the party is rotten.
If I had a restaurant I'd be offering these guys a free coffee and dessert along with a "no ICE" sign.
What if they just want cold water with ice?
::sad dehydration noises::
In January??
two types: the classical libertarian who wants to protect their community against looters or pigs the nazi
Can you say “Mulford Act” and Gun control Act of 1968?
The one time republicans and the NRA were for gun control (and let’s not forget that the republicans had an entirely different stance to begin with regarding firearms until that bastard Harlon Carter decided to politicize guns) was when black people armed up. The Mulford act was specifically designed to disarm the Black Panthers.
Oakland has stricter-than-usual gun control laws to this day because of the Black Panthers. The solution, of course, is to simply get the guns in a neighboring area where it's easier to do so.
Yeah, having a gun free zone right next to a gun restricted one is kind of pointless (See US/Mexico border).
It is almost like we would need for all the states to work together to create gun control laws. Maybe they could like federate into a single government body that would be in charge of these regulations and not beholden to special interests.
view more: next ›