this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
444 points (98.9% liked)

Comic Strips

21138 readers
2105 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No one? Ok then,

“Now you’re thinking with portals!”

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

^--- Comment sponsored by Aperture Science

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This reminds me of the time on a field trip in a hilly campus when I seized the opportunity to roll down a sweet hill and then I was going too fast and couldn't stop myself until it leveled out a hundred feet away and when I got up my classmates were gone because they left me

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago

Id never seen this before. Its amazing! thanks for sharing.

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 56 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There is a guy on YouTube that simulates portals using real physics and science stuff, turns out that if you model the gravity on all sides of the portal it balances out and you would stop right in the middle of the two portals at least if they were perfectly over each other in a case like this you would stop somewhere in the middle of the slide because the gravity would travel between both portals

https://youtu.be/DydIhwLrbMk

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Didn't one of his other videos conclude with something about an object falling infinitely though portals causes them to accumulate opposing positive and negative masses and eventually turn into a black hole?

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Not as far as I've seen, it's possible he did more simulations but in the type he was doing infinite falling didn't happen or I think technically it did once until he turned on air resistance.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The gravity is going down parallel to the portal opening though, so both portals have the same gravity direction, the only thing speeding you up is the slide

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's not how it works, when you actually simulate it it doesn't violate the laws of thermodynamics, the gravity would be bending outside of the portal so that it would be pulling up from the portal on the top, you should watch the video it is really technical but it explains almost every question you could ask about portals (except when it gets to relativity) because it is an actual simulation of gravity, and if that isn't enough he has an entire series, 3 portals? Portal inside of Portal? Portal moving onto a cube? Literally all of it and more.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well thank god a magic portal doesn't violate the laws of thermodynamics, I was getting worried about science for a while there

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Magic portals are one option but portals are actually completely allowed in relativity they probably don't exist but my point is you can make physically consistent portals that actually have laws they obey.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the fact that would violate the laws of thermodynamics (infinite energy) is a pretty good indication that's wrong.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

Portals already violate the laws of thermodynamics. We’re arguing about whether gravity would work here.

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Imagine how awesome ziplining would be.

[–] Tilgare@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Your portals would have to be extremely precise, otherwise you're free falling on the second run.

Now skydiving - hell yeah.

[–] notreallyhere@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] justdaveisfine@piefed.social 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] Lemming421@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Maybe. Who am I to judge?

[–] X@piefed.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] notreallyhere@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

you need more effort than that to call it exercise

[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] DasFaultier@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

Am almost 40, can confirm.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Friction. The friction on his arse must be quite...mmmm, delicious.

[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

Dr. Hotpants

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Matty_r@programming.dev 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Economy so bad people are using propreitery units.