this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2026
87 points (89.2% liked)

Political Memes

10266 readers
2039 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 49 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Explanation: Many European countries, including Ukraine, which is currently struggling against an imperialist incursion by Russia, have laws on the books which restrict or restrain elections during wars which violate the territorial integrity of the polity - ie, that holding elections while being bombed is impractical, and holding elections in occupied territory is impossible.

The US, being a vast country even at its youngest point, founded in an era before motorized armies and aerial bombing, and insanely attached to the one document that lays out the processes of our government (because if we weren't, we'd immediately start killing each other over what it should be instead), has no such laws. During the US Civil War, we just ignored the South during the 1864 election. Doing so resulted in the most radical and forward-thinking (relative to contemporary society) Congress in US history, and a resounding re-election victory for President Abraham Lincoln.

... we gave the South their fucking voting rights back too soon.

[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Sherman should have done more.

Also traitors should have been treated as the treasonous scum they were.

Reconstruction ended too early.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago (1 children)

As it just so happens, however, the current cunt in office is trying to cancel the midterms and 2028 elections under a manufactured crisis.

So we'll see how long we have that moral high ground.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 8 points 4 days ago

I mean, the arguments put forth for not having elections during wartime is sound. It's not so much a moral high ground as an amusing piece of trivia.

But yes, the current shitwit's enthusiasm for locking us under the fascist regime is... notable.

As a southerner, I approve this message.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 4 points 4 days ago

"And besides, according to all known laws of aviation..."

Lol I love when the bee movie script shows up in unexpected places

[–] NorthoftheBorder@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What occurs to me is that a state of emergency will be called only in the blue states and the 2028 election will somehow only be held in the red states. Insane but… so is everything else that has happened.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago

Oooooooh... Noooooow I see it.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Quite the stretch. There really isn't any comparison to be done between a war of foreign aggression and a civil war in this context. Also didn't the US allow a third time for Roosevelt during WWII for much the same reasons?

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 4 points 3 days ago

Quite the stretch. There really isn’t any comparison to be done between a war of foreign aggression and a civil war in this context.

As I said elsewhere, the effect of denying the centralized government the ability to offer elections in occupied territory is the same.

Also didn’t the US allow a third time for Roosevelt during WWII for much the same reasons?

There was no law at the time limiting the number of terms presidents could win.