this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2026
3 points (80.0% liked)

news

380 readers
1031 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] RalphNader2028@reddthat.com 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Right?! But yawning or not, welcome to the new world.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Kinda just feels like a shittier version of the old world.

[–] RalphNader2028@reddthat.com -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Nah, fam. This is the funner version of the old world!

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Where nobody can afford gaming PCs anymore just so some upper middle class people can live out their fantasy of clogging up the highway and sitting in traffic without having to physically hold the steering wheel.

Imagine for a second if all these cars were self driving! It would look exactly the same!

[–] RalphNader2028@reddthat.com -2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Brah, I get what you are saying. But you are complaining that people can't "afford gaming PCs." That sounds pretty 1st world problems to me. Now if ya wanna talk about healthcare, education, food, etc., then yeah.

But seriously?! You're mad because vid games are expensive? If that's your argument, I'm voting on side of self-driving cars.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

What gives you the right to assume cars will be a better use of these chips than humans will?

My criticism of self-driving cars here is focused on 3d computing aspects because we are talking about Nvidia in this context.

I have plenty of other criticisms of self-driving cars, they are stupid vapid idea in general compared to actual solutions like mass transit, remote work, and building livable, walkable landscapes.

[–] RalphNader2028@reddthat.com 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I dig 'em. And they are coming, regardless of how much you are annoyed by them.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Are they? People have been saying that for awhile.

[–] RalphNader2028@reddthat.com 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Do you seriously think that we aren't going to have self-driving cars be the majority in the future? Brah, come on now...

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Honestly I don't care either way because cars aren't the future but no I do not think self-driving cars will be the majority anytime soon.

The sky will be full of truly autonomous vehicles long before autonomous ground vehicles will be mastered, it is the hardest category to pass off to a navigation AI and yeah I am completely unimpressed by current iterations of self-driving cars especially given how much the CEOs pump up the capabilities while ignoring reality.

What will happen is cars get harder and harder to crash with more and more assistance, but the idea of fully self-driving cars outside of limited fixed routes is a pipe dream and worse it distracts people from thinking about more transformative transit technologies. I am sure there will be a smaller number of approved fully autonomous driving routes but the further you go down that road the more you are just reinventing mass transit in a less efficient fashion.

[–] RalphNader2028@reddthat.com 0 points 6 days ago

Good points.