A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens
Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics
Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instance’s local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.
🔭 Science
🚀 Engineering
🌌 Art and Photography
All that PR and marketing nonsense, and not a single mention of what a 'first ever hybrid engine' is.
It is difficult to parse the translations but I am confident they intend to refer to a "hybrid-propellant rocket engine" which indeed makes this a major milestone in rocketry in terms of orbital maneuvering engines.
Hybrid rockets avoid some of the disadvantages of solid rockets like the dangers of propellant handling, while also avoiding some disadvantages of liquid rockets like their mechanical complexity.[1] Because it is difficult for the fuel and oxidizer to be mixed intimately (being different states of matter), hybrid rockets tend to fail more benignly than liquids or solids. Like liquid rocket engines, hybrid rocket motors can be shut down easily and the thrust is throttleable. The theoretical specific impulse performance of hybrids is generally higher than solid motors and lower than liquid engines. As high as 400 s has been measured in a hybrid rocket using metalized fuels.[2] Hybrid systems are more complex than solid ones, but they avoid significant hazards of manufacturing, shipping and handling solid rocket motors by storing the oxidizer and the fuel separately.