this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2025
36 points (86.0% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

14923 readers
294 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Perhaps it's a good idea not to have houses in flood plains...

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Agreed, especially since there are probably plenty of better locations in NJ to have these houses rebuilt. With the rise of insurance costs this will save 1200 people the hassle of higher prices and the increased percentage of having to deal with a disaster. It sounds like a great idea to me.

[–] DougHolland@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why do you add the quotes, OP? Is there a better 'answer' that New Jersey could feasibly offer?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Depends on the cause of the flooding. If it's failure to enforce limits on impervious surface of new construction, they need to fix that. If it's climate change, they need to make policies that address the causes of climate change (e.g. zoning reform for walkability).

That's in addition to buying out the properties, not instead of, BTW.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If it’s climate change, they need to make policies that address the causes of climate change (e.g. zoning reform for walkability)

And how will that change coastal inundation?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

If New Jersey acts but other entities don't, the fight against climate change might fail. If nobody acts because they assume everybody else won't, the fight will definitely fail.

Therefore, your question is irrelevant and New Jersey must act.

[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

In a world of bad options, for a state government this might be the best of the worst.

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

How is this dystopic?

[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Coming soon on the Trump Show: "Floods are AI Antifa Oax and will be soon declared illegal "

[–] rollerbang@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Now go and sue the person/entity that has approved construction in areas prone to flooding.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

New construction in floodplains justifiably gets outrage, but the reality is most of them have been there a long time. Most of them have had flood repairs that were less than the cost of replacing. It’s really not useful to look to the past and be judgmental about when they should have known to stop building there, or even stopped repairing there. But we clearly know now

The specific example in the article was a 60 year old guy talking about his childhood home being bulldozed.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I don’t get either calling this dystopia or putting “answer” in quotes. This seems like a great example of a local town adapting to climate change. Many towns probably need to follow this example