this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025
97 points (96.2% liked)

World News

51904 readers
1700 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Volodymyr Zelenskyy says the US has agreed to offer “strong” security guarantees to Ukraine for 15 years, but acknowledged that the future of the country’s eastern Donbas region was unresolved after his two-hour meeting on Sunday with Donald Trump in Florida.

Speaking on his way back to Europe, Zelenskyy said the US Congress and Ukraine’s parliament would jointly vote on American pledges. These were a key part of a 20-point peace plan discussed with the US president at his Mar-a-Lago residence, he said.

The guarantees are seen by Kyiv as crucial to deter further Russian aggression in the event of a peace deal. Zelenskyy admitted that previous promises – including the US and UK-backed 1994 Budapest memorandum guaranteeing Ukraine’s borders – “did not work”.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 62 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

It seems odd to me that a Ukrainian would trust a security guarantee from a western nation, and particularly one helmed by a mercurial president suffering from dementia. They were already supposed to have a security guarantee for giving up their nukes.

[–] Lembot_0006@programming.dev 33 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Nobody trusts anything. Later they will start talking about what exactly those guarantees are, and then the idea will die out. Ukraine can't stop talking with the USA. The last thing we need is the USA as an open enemy.

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Zelesky in contrast to Trump is something to behold. A comedian turned hero has to dance for a clown in order to save his country. Fuck Im pissed off at the US, man... you fucking beasts. You were supposed to be better than this. Zelensky was a comedian, Trump's America is a joke.

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

What's with television stars running countries?

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

People trust familiarity; unfortunately, that includes untrustworthy familiar people.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 weeks ago

At least Zelenskyy has a law degree, even if he did end up pursuing a career in comedy and entertainment instead.

Trump has a bachelor's degree in economics and a career of running businesses to bankruptcy.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That's a really good point that I hadn't considered.

[–] CocaineShrimp@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 weeks ago

Unfortunately it's at the point where it's better than nothing. The orange Cheeto could definitely throw another flamin hot temper tantrum like him and JD did a few months ago, and throw the whole thing out.

That's why Zelenskyy apologized so hard, when it was JD who started the whole tiff for absolutely no reason (I watched the clip like 3-4 times. It came out of no where). Zelenskyy knows this is about survival, not a dick-waggling contest

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Who else would they be able to trust outside of the western world? China? I don’t disagree that the US should have honored their original agreement for nuclear disarmament, but Ukraine is between a rock and a hard place right now.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Good question. Who do they trust?

The US and Europe, who outright betrayed them?

Or Russia/China, who invaded?

It's a bad sign when you're looking at two options and have to decide which one sucks worse.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago

How did Europe betray them?

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s a bad sign when you’re looking at two options and have to decide which one sucks worse.

Welcome to US elections for decades.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Probably worth as much as security guarantees from the russia.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

It's wild to me to have to honestly consider the truth of that statement.

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A further problem for him is that Trump's pledges are worth exactly nothing. Let Ukraine join NATO, that is the only reassurance.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

exactly right... trump word was useless when he was a trashy reality tv host... he has shown his word is less than worthless by now

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

At the very least, this publicly puts pressure on Russia. Zelensky can't just wish the war away or tell Trump what to do, but he can play his best hand.

Let's say that some papers do get signed and and it makes Russia have to pivot or draws in more support from NATO. Maybe a couple months later Trump roles back those protections. That's a couple of months closer to Trump's exit and the hope for a better future system. He's hopefully lived to fight another day. At worst, talks devolve and the status quo remains the same.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Frankly, security assurances from the current US regime to Ukraine are very probably worth less than the paper they’re written on.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

True, but the whole process can throw wrenches into Russia's invasion and maybe be a catalyst to get other countries to step up their support as well. The US isn't the only Western country doing wrong by Ukraine.

[–] Beefcyclone@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't think any security guarantees are worth the paper they are written on, aggressors only know strength and co signers suddenly get cold feet when shit hits the fan.

Ukraine needs to be armed to the teeth, as do we all.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Agreed.

If the US really wanted to nip war in the bud here, they'd slip Ukraine a nuke.

[–] Ach@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

It's been largely forgotten that the Russian invasion at the start was an absolute diaaster, and their entire armed forces literally broke down on a road for like a month. The entire Russian empire could have been knee capped for generations right there if just one nation had bombed that road.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Oh yeah make a deal with the man Epstein said was the most evil person he’s ever met . I’m sure that will work out

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Don't believe the shitbag!