this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2025
281 points (94.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

38789 readers
832 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I hear these comments for not wanting to help people, and it feels like we're worshipping individuality to the detriment of community, which is necessary for survival.

  • "I don't want my money going to ___ ."
  • "This is not a democracy, it's a constitutional republic!"
  • "You don't have any freedoms under socialism/communism."
  • "They're just looking for a handout because they're lazy."
  • "I'm a self-made man. I didn't need anyone's help."
  • "Empathy is not a virtue."
  • "I don't see how that's my problem."
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

This is largely an American problem, although it is spreading due to global media.

I blame it largely on Calvinism and the prosperity gospel:

"Good things come to good people" -> "If good things didn't come to you, you're not a good person" -> "Poor people are poor because they are bad people, and we should not help them" -> "It's okay to help billionaires, they wouldn't be rich if they weren't good people"

A lot of poor people have this view in the US, which you would think would make them reconsider it, but they solve this with mental gymnastics: They and their in-group are good people, so obviously it's okay to help them and the good things are coming any second. Another reason not to tax rich people, they'll be one soon!

[–] umbrellacloud@leminal.space 1 points 16 hours ago

This is also true in Hinduism and Buddhism, it's just always been convienient for rulers to convince peasents of this

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

From my own observations it appears that empathy is rapidly being worn away by hatred. Its hard to empathize with things that go contrary to one's ideas of correctness

[–] BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world 9 points 21 hours ago

Is not about eliminating empathy. That party is a side effect of carpet bombing anything the left values. It's just another "makes libs cry"

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Our president is a felon rapist pedophile.

That's absolutely going to have an influence on young, impressionable minds.

The president is....well, used to be...a person that, among other things, acted as a role model. Now kids are going to be looking to that role model and seeing a felon rapist pedophile that reached the top of our societal structure and they're going to emulate.

Our society was already sick. Now it's terminal.

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 2 points 17 hours ago

Remember when we used to say someone is "acting Presidential", back then it didn't mean tweeting a bunch of derogatory things and grabbing women.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 2 points 18 hours ago

The idea that the president used to act as a role model is so bizarre to me as a Swede. We've had prominent political figures that have had very good reputations, but I can't imagine anyone considering a politician as a role model. They're just people that, hopefully, are doing their job. Wanting to emulate a politician, like a prime minister, or a president, just feels scarily like hero worship. Very culty.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Just had this discussions on Christmas. Jesuses teachings are pretty explicit that followers are supposed to be charitable and compassionate and give freely and help those they can. Talking to some conservative Christian about it they said they were finding it very hard not to be cynical and see every case of charity as just fraud.

To the point where not imprisoning people for trying to move somewhere for work is something they really consider charity.

It's a sharp contradiction to me

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 4 points 19 hours ago

"Back in the day" a lot more people went to church on a regular basis. They also beat their children on a regular basis, and a much larger percentage of those children grew up to perpetrate violence, domestic and otherwise, in their adult lives.

The core teachings of Jesus, Buddha, the Dalai Lama, and the rest are good. People standing in the pulpit saying whatever it takes to fill the pews and get donations.... less good on average. Theory is easier than putting that theory into faithful practice.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

right wing propaganda via news, shows and movies is very effectivive. its always seperating "in groups" against outgroups"aka poors, lgbtq+, homeless, drug addicts, prostitutes, vs a moral white guy that is always above average. or sometimes they show those wierd racist kinks, like white guy going after asian women. thats how they pacify americans.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

MAGA conservatives are literally unable to feel empathy. There have been scientific studies showing the connection between the brain structures that feel empathy and political leaning

It is our duty to encourage empathy in others, otherwise waves arms

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10281241/

[–] dil@lemmy.zip 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Are we making ppl more insensitive to sex by mass circumcising?

[–] DrivebyHaiku@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

These values are cyclical in history. Mostly they persist until the system breaks down and then there is a surge of solidarity which sets things back on the path until people start thinking all their advantages came from their own ability and then the cycle repeats.

The early 1900's was fairly communal but the great war and the 1920's was filled with this sentiment of individuality until the depression crashed it out and then there was a split - a combo of Union efforts, reinvestment in government systems and extreme solidarity out of nessesity in the US/UK and the same time toxic individuality caused a canabalization of society in fascist areas of Europe. The World War created more extreme communal solidarity. In the areas where there was union resistance and communal solidarity legislation to keep businesses in check was installed and that gave way to pushback from business interest. As solidarity continued there was more general prosperity and you started seeing marginalized communities start to speak up. Racial communities, disability communities, queer communities - those who had been denied the comfort everyone else was taking for granted popped up and fought like hell for empathy and some made bigger wins than others...but then you start seeing the push back. Austerity gospel via Regan and Thatcher "there is no society just individuals and families" and all those safeguards and solidarity that were put in place to solve the crash of the 30's started to be undone and slandered as "too much overreach".

Looking at the UK if you go back even further you see this cycle repeat work backwards and you see it. Victorian workhouse systems replacing the welfare state and then being discarded as cruel. The Georgian fight for the poor law and charity and the industrial revolution's runaway excess of the rich that fed people into the meat grinder of labour and erroded poor law to force compliance.

Empathy's time will come again but apparently we need to be reminded by virtue of horror what the cost of this kind of inviduality is.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 19 hours ago

the cost of this kind of inviduality is.

The thing is, it's a rare individual who "benefits" from the direction we are continuing to move in. Unless they're a bunch of sadists who like watching the rest of the world suffer while they insulate themselves with security forces, that they can't really trust, because where do you get the people to maintain the security?

A society where the richest can walk down High Street in London without a thought to "personal security" is better for the people at the top, too. Unless they're sadists.

[–] verdi@feddit.org 48 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It's by design.

The spread of the superhero (Übermenschen) to ubiquity in pop culture, especially Hollywood, the punishing and assumption of evil within destitute people, the indoctrination of children (pledge of allegiance et al), the selective curricula that largely keep the general education from showing the populace of the US that their country is more closely related to a self styled African dictatorship than a modern social democracy. Usanians frequently utter "it's not personal, it's business". That is the hallmark of declining hegemon and roughly translates to "fuck you, got mine".

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 19 hours ago

roughly translates to “fuck you, got mine”.

In the US you much more frequently hear it the other way around: "I got mine, now you fuck off." Until they "get theirs" they maintain the pretense of sociability.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The spread of the superhero (Übermenschen) to ubiquity in pop culture, especially Hollywood

You mean, like Superman (1938), Flash Gordon (1936), Captain Marvel (1941), etc.?

[–] Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Except in those days they were considered cheap entertainment and they certainly didn't dominate cultural output the way they do now. There was also a difference of treatment. The ubermenschen is not just about explicit super heroes, it's more about the shift toward heroes with a destiny so manifest, and plot armor so thick, that they are morally justified in doing anything. The John Wick style "fuck you i'll shoot up a night club cause some guy shanked my dog" which is written to feel entirely justified to the audience. And he's right cause he wins in the end, just like the 80s action guy who's totally justified in crashing dozens of cars during rush hour cause he kills the one bad guy in the end. It's pretty distinct from comics culture which was actually pretty moralistic, at least that's how i understand it.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

the 80s action guy who’s totally justified in crashing dozens of cars during rush hour cause he kills the one bad guy in the end

Axel Foley is my hero!

It's all entertainment - what I will never comprehend (though they are so simple it's easy to understand) is how a glimpsed female nipple is a bigger problem "for the children" than GI Joe spraying a village with napalm and bullets.

it’s not personal, it’s business

This mentality is such an ingrained part of corporate culture, and our culture has been centered around corporate life since around when Reagan came into office. The top suggestions for how to survive in this USA culture is to cut off empathy. What's worse is I think a lot of people have. There's an air of cruelty to every aspect of this society, from politics to police to medical to social media. Everyone wants a break from the reality of their shitty life, and many are willing to step on others for the hope of an opportunity.

[–] umbrellacloud@leminal.space 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

OK instead of looking at it that way, think about how you feel about other people and what other people mean to you.

If someone new is born, does that mean you have a new resource, or a new competition for resources?

Back in the day, a new person meant a extra pair of hands, not just another mouth to feed.

If I died tomorrow, would you care in any material way? I'm not talking about your subjective, passing emotions, I'm talking about if you would feel my loss materially. Would anything be different about your life?

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I would. Even just the comment you left here impact my world in a positive way. You probally work too (visable or invisible labor). Your existence, your voice creates space for others.

But that is in sharp contrast to have been told people are just wicked and evil all day and that people just take from the deserving and give nothing back.

[–] umbrellacloud@leminal.space 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I actually do work in a field which benefits others.

I was able to work full time because so many people in my industry quit or died during covid. I probably wouldn't have a steady paycheck if it weren't for the deaths of thousands of people. I just couldn't get my foot in the door. This goes for all industires. The job market has been terrible and way too competitive for my entire adult life. For me to own a home, thousands more would need to also die. Please do not retaliate against me for informing you of this. It's not my fault, my doing, or my preference.

There aren't enough housing units to accomodate the population, and for this to change, some people are going to have to either reliquish their property or build more properties. I didn't set it up this way and me pointing it out doesn't mean I'm evil or that I want it to be like this.

[–] nek0d3r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

These are age old comments, I heard all of them from a very young age. It's been there the whole time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes. We have become a nation of de facto sovereign citizens. The average American thinks of nothing past the crummy job, the soul breaking commute, the mortgage, and another Ben Franklin for the third star on the fourth stripe on little Ayngylynn's tae kwon do white belt. Frank Freeway and Susie Soccermom are too wrapped up in themselves to care what kind of people we are.

Back in 1997, my sociology professor said the US would become the meanest society in history. And OMFFSM, I see it everywhere. There's no more sense of community or even common courtesy. Hurt the other guy or get hurt. Violence over small things will soon be commonplace and inescapable. We will all have to be armed, much as we may hate it. This is all by design.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

OMFFSM

What is this acronym

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh my fucking god, where their god is the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 98 points 2 days ago
[–] zorflieg@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Ignore. Empathy is hot.

load more comments
view more: next ›