this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
110 points (99.1% liked)

Wikipedia

4334 readers
311 users here now

A place to share interesting articles from Wikipedia.

Rules:

Recommended:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Look at what they took from you men. Reject modernity, embrace tradition.

Step in to the heels and flaunt the lace.

[โ€“] aramis87@fedia.io 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

๐ŸŽต Be an example to your sex! Give your boot a dapper strap, And it's smarter if your garter has some snap!

Cravats should be flounced about our necks; Wear a nightcap when you nap - Be bewitching with some stitching on your cap!

Now, drape your cape And puff your cuff, Embroider those lapels! Be the king of the beasts in pastels!

La, but someone has to strike a pose And bear the weight of well-tailored clothes And that is why the Lord created men! ๐ŸŽต

[โ€“] notsure@fedia.io 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[โ€“] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Okay Mat Cauthon

[โ€“] xylogx@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is fascinating! As I understand it, driven by the enlightenment and the industrial revolution, men rejected beauty in favor of rationality and standardization. Men apparently traded in high-heels for a pocket-watch.

[โ€“] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I appreciate It takes a man 5 seconds to get ready vs woman that still feel they have to put full armor on before leaving home.

[โ€“] yetiftw@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yeah but more often than not that full armor is fun! and if you're not impatient, then taking more time really isn't that big of a deal

[โ€“] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One of My roommates felt it was an expression of herself and rocked a bold look. Very valid.

I like The simpler style but I have 0 art sense. Especially when I just wanna get groceries and maybe stop for a donut. I don't see the need to be kitted up. "Like let's goo! Your mother is in the car!" Lol

[โ€“] yetiftw@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

because why not? at least if it could make it a more enjoyable experience

[โ€“] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You have a strong argument. If it's fun why not. I entirely respect the other side of my position. Its Just not fun to me. Plus I barely wanna look at my face for 5 seconds in the mirror to style my hair. Lol

[โ€“] yetiftw@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

but maybe if you spent more time on it you would want to look at your face for longer and decorate it

[โ€“] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

You make a interesting point. I can see how that could happen. Though i think people do this so other people can look at them. Like those Asian makeup transformations are epic.

Fundamentally, I don't think I have patience or skill for it. Like I can't draw a straight line with a ruler.
Plus I want to blend into a room and not standout. Then there is the money and finding the right makeup. This is too oilly, this brand doesn't sell my shade, the thing i like is discountinued, this is great but it's 50$ an ounce. Makes me want to hit head against wall.

[โ€“] yetiftw@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

the beginnings of boring modernism ๐Ÿฅฒ

[โ€“] Etterra@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

dress/formal/professional clothes are designed to enforce the class devide. Wear cheap casual and fuck that shit.

my wife and I dress pretty similarly. Does still look better on her though.

[โ€“] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I feel that with modern casual clothes, we've somewhat renounced the renunciation. Most of my shirts are some color, even my dress shirts actually.

[โ€“] python@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago

sad times ๐Ÿ˜”

[โ€“] Anticorp@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[โ€“] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Apparently a big part of it was Beau Brummel.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beau_Brummell

He was an influencer among the English aristocracy and did a lot to drive the fashion of his era. That's him in the picture in this post.

[โ€“] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did he just not want to deal with all the frills anymore, or what?

[โ€“] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Actually, backing up a bit, this was all happening in the late 1700's in the midst of the Enlightenment and the French Revolution. There was a widespread rejection of anything tied to the old running classes of western Europe, and an embrace of utility over flair.

In Brummel's case he also apparently had a reputation for obsessing over details. So he went with the trend of avoiding garish, flamboyant clothes but would still show his class status by being super particular about the cut, fabric, stitching, etc. It caught on among the aristocracy. Modern men's formal wear is still very much stuck in that mindset.

[โ€“] Anticorp@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is interesting history that I've never heard of before. Thank you for sharing. I'm sort of glad for his influence, since I don't think I'd enjoy wearing all the crap worn by men in the 17th and 18th centuries.

[โ€“] felixwhynot@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago