this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2025
140 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26765 readers
2408 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] beemikeoak@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 6 hours ago

Let's release all the files properly:

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 10 points 12 hours ago

Trump is the worst thing to happen to the reputation of Wharton Business School. And the worst thing to happen to the reputation of America.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 22 points 15 hours ago

Perhaps it could have if Trump had delegated the management of the project to someone competent, but that’s not what he did. Instead, the famously lazy and disorganized president decided to blow off his actual governance duties in favor of micromanaging a construction project he is incapable of handling.

This is the gist of it.

Some more:

Trump keeps changing things, driven by a short-sighted impulsiveness that keeps pushing him to expand the scope of the project. Initially, it was supposed to seat 650 people in 90,000 square feet, but he kept throwing tantrums about how he wanted it bigger. Earlier this month, he even ran off the initial architect, and odds are that will happen again.

The projected price tag has already ballooned from $200 million to $400 million, but those numbers have almost no meaning since they don’t correlate to any plans that would generate an estimate.

Then there’s the red tape. Even though a judge ruled against the National Trust for Historic Preservation in their lawsuit to temporarily halt construction, he required the White House to avoid building anything foundational and demanded plans for the structure be submitted by the end of the year. But as the White House hasn’t even scheduled meetings with the National Capital Planning Commission to start the process, meeting that deadline appears unlikely.

I am all out of snark.

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 54 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

So he just destroyed half the White House, one of the biggest symbols of America?

Just like he bankrupted casinos?

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 17 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

If in some alternate universe, I were in a creative writing class and tasked with writing a story full of cliche metaphors, and handed in a story about the past year here...that's a solid B+/A-.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 5 points 9 hours ago

The Gasby party while they withheld snap, tearing down the Whitehouse, the hunger games... It's so on the nose a grade schooler would pick up on the symbolism

Seriously... They can stop physically performing metaphors, we get it!

[–] bklyn@piefed.social 13 points 19 hours ago

He didn’t bankrupt to those casinos by tearing their sides off. So, no, not quite like that.

[–] AstaKask@lemmy.cafe 36 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

"They are very good at breaking things, but they don’t know how to create anything of value."

That's just every conservative ever.

[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 46 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

He couldn't even build a wall

[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 17 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

America must come to grips with what they thought he was versus what he actually is. This is sadly part of the healing process, or so I hope.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 7 hours ago

That's not the problem. America is just desperate for change, and the Democrats are allergic to using power

Obama won on promising change, but did nothing except put healthcare into a death spiral (the ACA came from the heritage foundation, also known for hits like project 2025)

Biden won because of the pandemic, and then the Democratic party quietly fiddled with the dials a little. But they were still so allergic to rocking the boat they didn't prosecute Trump for attempting a coup

Then Biden/Kamala ran on the platform "everything is actually already perfect, you're just too stupid to realize it"

Recently they refused to release the autopsy of the election, because it said the one thing they refuse to try... Meaningful change. To take a stand against the billionaires and make some enemies

Trump is different. He got up there and said "our county is on fire, and I'm going to fix it". And then he said the most incoherent meaningless shit, which was then sane washed through the billionaire controlled media to say dozens of different things

But he's already spent the trust of the people too now. They're not going to buy into that kind of rhetoric again for a while, but they're also done with the gaslighting and empty posturing

What we need is someone who will use their power for good. No more empty promises or consultant pilled drivel. Clear, simple to understand plans. Crisp messaging. Explicit promises.

The current Democratic establishment is floundering in their attempts to find some formula where they can copy the energy of change, but still do the centrist uniparty bullshit.

We don't need to get over Trump, we need to get past the Democratic party leaders and their ratfucking of progressives

[–] starik@lemmy.zip 18 points 19 hours ago

This better not be true. This was the whole reason I voted for him.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

It is quite a feat to save people from embarrassment, namely from a golden abomination of trashiness, through another embarrassment such as this.

Let anyone say they don't make progress - quite the contrary: every day brings new lows.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Okay, but what about the data center underneath it?

[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 1 points 5 hours ago

That is all that matters to them