this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2025
125 points (98.4% liked)

News

38428 readers
1792 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a significant escalation of Caribbean tensions, President Nicolas Maduro has ordered Venezuela’s navy to escort oil tankers departing the country’s eastern coast for the high seas. The maneuver serves as a direct challenge to the maritime blockade announced earlier this week by United States President Donald Trump, who has vowed to intercept sanctioned vessels trading with Venezuela.

The decision to deploy military escorts follows a week of rising hostilities, sparked when U.S. special forces neutralized a Venezuelan tanker in the Caribbean. Describing the seized vessel as “big, very big,” President Trump justified the measure on Wednesday, stating, “They took our rights. We had a lot of oil there. They kicked out our companies, and we want it back.”

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 57 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Every nation has the right to protect its citizens at sea from piracy or acts of war.

If a Ukrainian cargo ship was attacked by the Russian navy then Ukraine could protect it and no one would question those actions.

Surely every U.S. Navy admiral and ship captains would know that if they got an order to attack Venezuelan Navy vessels.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 24 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Surely every U.S. Navy admiral and ship captains would know that if they got an order to attack Venezuelan Navy vessels.

Now is the time we are going to see if US military personnel are too cowardly to refuse illegal orders or not. I suspect there is a good chance the answer will be disappointing but resistance is still possible.

More likely I think the US military is going to lose a major asset like a ship from topdown orders to do utterly braindead shit during a strike and conforming to them even though the orders are horribly stupid and ill-advised tactically. This is nearly an inveitable eventuality if this escalation continues as people like Pete Hegseth are literally incapable of looking at a fancy military map with ships on it and not needing to pointlessly order them around to feel powerful when surrounded by actual military brass who know how to do their job, even if it will obviously kill US military personnel for no good reason, the brain of Pete Hegseth has been conditioned and rotted out from playing the part of a powerful fascist and is physically incapable of listening in that type of situation.

Think about it, imagine a situation where Navy brass are telling Pete Hegseth his idea is an extremely stupid thing to do with a guided missile destroyer and will get it blown up resulting in the deaths of all the crew members and replay it 1000 times with the Navy brass bringing up the point in a 1000 different ways and find one where you can credibly argue Pete Hegseth would listen. You can't, it is a futile exercise, this is categorically an impossible eventuality in the real world.

Unfortunately I think if the Trump administration has truly decided on war with Venezuela the only thing that can stop it is a tidal wave of shear embarrassment and humiliation that shatters the resolve of US bigots by underlining how their fascism makes them completely unfit to lead a military rationally, which is really the only place Centrists will actually break with Conservatives on military foreign policy despite the superficial claims Centrists make about caring about what is right and wrong.

Exhibit A see the Palestinian Genocide and complete lack of giving a shit by the leadership of the political center of the US and how it nearly perfectly aligns with the brutal cruelty of Conservative world views.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 19 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

[EDIT: did some research]

illegal orders

You're 100% right:

Congress has not issued an Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) or a formal declaration of war. Consequently, since November 4, 2025, all U.S. kinetic operations within the Venezuelan theater have occurred in a state of statutory unauthorized hostilities

Even though these are finally military ships, the Trump administration has managed to make attacking them a violation of US law.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 8 points 7 months ago

The fascists in power will not be happy with only attacking military targets, for evidence of that see literally every step that has been taken until now by them.

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 5 points 7 months ago

On the other hand, if the US can seize Venezuelan vessels on the high seas, why can't Europe stop Russia's shadow fleet?

[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago

So when the US "neutralized a Venezuelan tanker", that wasn't an escalation, but now when Maduro takes measures to prevent this happening again, now it's a "significant escalation"??

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure that, since a blockade is an act of war and it's not within the president's power to declare war, Congress will act any second now to stop this problem from escalating. Right? RIGHT?!

[–] Jesusaurus@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Like the vote that failed yesterday, where Republicans just bent over and let him do what he wants?

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

So full order of events. US companies invest in Venezuelan oil, they begin pumping and selling oil, Venezuelan government shoos them out to make more money, equipment fails and Venezuela makes less money per year despite owning 100% of the profits, things are fine-ish for decades between the two nations, oil talks begin again, little comes of them, US begins bombing boats that they state without verification are drug boats, trump personally chooses to begin stealing oil from a country decades removed from US involvement in their oil industry. Did I miss anything?

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

China.

How the U.S. is Handing Over Venezuela’s Oil Sector to China
https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/How-the-US-is-Handing-Over-Venezuelas-Oil-Sector-to-China.html

So, where does all the oil go? In past years, Caracas was able to strike agreements with Rosneft or with Indian buyers. But as the U.S. introduced secondary sanctions, and now secondary tariffs, there was only one buyer left, the only one that does not fear Washington’s threats: China.

[–] mr_account@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You forgot the bombing of civilian boats to escalate the conflict while claiming without evidence that they were transporting WMD drugs

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The US has been meddling in Venezuela's affairs for decades.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago

Alright, toss the severely condensed events at me, along with their space on the timeline, and I’ll edit them in. “Generic animosity at some point” doesn’t make for an easy add

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Trump administration: "YESSSS!!!! We can force them to defend themselves and when they do we can cry about being attacked and say we have no choice but to go to war now!!"

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 months ago

If anyone here has been with a narcissist, this is very familiar behavior.

[–] rayyy@piefed.social 4 points 7 months ago

Maybe China can send their tankers to get their oil.