this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
612 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

77742 readers
3845 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mozilla is in a tricky position. It contains both a nonprofit organization dedicated to making the internet a better place for everyone, and a for-profit arm dedicated to, you know, making money. In the best of times, these things feed each other: The company makes great products that advance its goals for the web, and the nonprofit gets to both advocate for a better web and show people what it looks like. But these are not the best of times. Mozilla has spent the last couple of years implementing layoffs and restructuring, attempting to explain how it can fight for privacy and openness when Google pays most of its bills, while trying to find its place in an increasingly frothy AI landscape.

Fun times to be the new Mozilla CEO, right? But when I put all that to Anthony Enzor-DeMeo, the company’s just-announced chief executive, he swears he sees opportunity in all the upheaval. “I think what’s actually needed now is a technology company that people can trust,” Enzor-DeMeo says. “What I’ve seen with AI is an erosion of trust.”

Mozilla is not going to train its own giant LLM anytime soon. But there’s still an AI Mode coming to Firefox next year, which Enzor-DeMeo says will offer users their choice of model and product, all in a browser they can understand and from a company they can trust. “We’re not incentivized to push one model or the other,” he says. “So we’re going to try to go to market with multiple models.”

-_-

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Can it be disabled?

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 19 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I'm going to have to go Amish at this rate.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Off grid is an easier transition :)

Yah but I like the pies.

will offer users their choice [...] “We’re not incentivized to push one model or the other,” he says. “So we’re going to try to go to market with multiple models.”

it could be worse

[–] Tonava@sopuli.xyz 36 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Programs are like socks, once they get dirty, you change them. Do these people really not understand how this stuff works? Even giants can fall when enough people switch to other options

[–] sommerset@thelemmy.club 5 points 10 hours ago (8 children)

Oh ya? Where u gonna go? Chrome?

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Wouldn't trust waterfox as far as I could throw a bull elephant.

Librefox or fuck even floorp is better then waterfox.

[–] LifeLikeLady@lemmy.world 1 points 22 minutes ago

Why? Just curious

[–] lando55@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You could always go Safari, at the rate Apple is going with Ai integration you should be good for... well forever really 🤣

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 1 points 2 hours ago

Safari is only available on Apple hardware and operating systems though

[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 10 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] oce@jlai.lu 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Can it survive if Firefox goes down?

[–] sommerset@thelemmy.club 4 points 4 hours ago

Ofc No. But waterfax might disable ai by default.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

There are literally dozens of browser options out there.

[–] Tonava@sopuli.xyz 10 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Hell no. For now just gonna switch to some firefox fork that won't include the AI.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Jumping to the dingy tied to the sinking ship.

[–] Tonava@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 hours ago

Thus the "for now"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 6 points 8 hours ago

I was hopeful for thundermail.

Not any more, seeing that.

[–] flemtone@lemmy.world 19 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Overpaid CEO has more money than actual sense.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 1 points 5 minutes ago

They all just do the same exact predictable thing. It's always the shittiest thing for everyone but the "share holders". Just automate them away and call it a day at this point.

[–] I_Clean_Here@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

But why? Be unique! Don't just do what everyone else does!

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

Given what Microsoft is smoking these days, no AI would be a selling point, and Mozilla does not seem to realize they are playing with fire. Their userbase chose their product instead of using the system defaults of Chrome, Safari, and Internet Exploder. Their users, just like Lemmy, are tech-litrrate and more socially concious than the masses. If an alternative or fork appears, with sufficent support, and Mozilla does not put the breaks on their AI train, were all just going to jump ship. We do it every time a new OS is installed, there is no Firefox loyalty, only lesser evils.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Who is this a signal for though? They could silently add the AI features and rally their base on aspects people actually like. It's almost like Firefox doesn't want to succeed

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 16 points 9 hours ago

CEOs have this massive psychosis, they really believe everyone wants this bullshit. I have a theory that it's because they were always surrounded by yesmen, and simultaneously they hate people, so for them the LLM is the best thing ever, all the constant agreeing and affirmation with no pesky humanity, and they can't believe there is anyone who don't want that.

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 11 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Why do they keep going all in on AI when no one wants it?

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 hour ago

Power users don’t want it.

Regular users say they don’t want it but actions don’t lie. They love AI. They love the slop. They just don’t want to be reminded that that’s what it is.

[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Google threatens to rip their funding if they don't advocate for AI

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 1 points 2 hours ago

Is that actually on record somewhere, or just speculation?

[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 30 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Mozilla is completely detached from its user base. They think their average user is a Microsoft enthusiast when in reality it's a Debian enjoyer.

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 8 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

They have telemetry to track the number of installations on different systems

[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago

And most debian user disable telemetry. Their numbers probably show its all windows folk heavily using AI because its the default.

[–] aivoton@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 hours ago

I guess I should turn the telemetry on so they'd see I'm using it on linux. Muh privacy

[–] notreallyhere@lemmy.world 21 points 13 hours ago

CEO = bad

every. single. time.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 24 points 16 hours ago

That's what all CEOs do. Double down on AI.

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 18 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

You either die Old Mozilla or you live to see yourself become Current Mozilla.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›