Kind of curious if The Room would be a good movie with a talented lead, or just forgettable.
Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
You could put Daniel Day-Lewis in that role and I think it would still be a terrible film. A good actor cannot rescue a story that inept. They might be able to wring some pathos from otherwise inept dialog, but it's not going to change the fundamental structural issues with the movie, and, as you allude to, it might strip it of what makes it entertaining in the first place.
Explain to me what the plot is to answer your question.
If you recast Jared Leto in Tron: Aries, everyone might have actually tried instead of saying "This is gonna flop anyways, why bother writing a good script?"
I think if you recast everything let has been in all of those movies would have been improved
With the exception of lord of war. I feel like he was perfect in that role
Sadly he wasn't the worst part of the film. He actually fit his role pretty well. The main female lead was pretty damn wooden. I was totally expecting my feelings towards the leading roles to be reversed but I actually think you'd have a better film if she was replaced rather than Jared. And I hate him in most things. I do think however if you replaced him in blade runner 2049 it'd be a better film. Even though he fits that role really well, probably better than the one in Tron, he's still the weakest part of that film specifically.
I just looked her up, apparently her top credit on IMDb is "Interesting Person #2" in Into the Spiderverse.
I didn't watch it specifically because of Leto. I was absolutely stoked each time I saw an ad for it (forgetting that Leto was in it) right up until his stupid face popped up in the trailer.
If they had somebody else, even a complete no-name actor, I would have watched it. It is impressive how effectively they pushed away their audience.
I was so excited for this movie until I saw him and knew it would be a dud
Double recast in the MCU:
Starlord should have been played by Jeremy Renner, and Hawkeye should have been played by Crisp Ratt.
It would have fit the characterization in the comics better. In the comics, Hawkeye is more of a goofy wisecracking dude who gets lots of chicks, and Starlord is more of a responsible & respectable straight-man for the rest of the GotG to annoy with their weirdness.
Some guys made a ten-hour film about paint drying to piss off the censors. Replacing the wall with about anybody would probably be a vast improvement...
I too would watch paint drying on Scarlett Johansson.
This is an old one, but the Maltese Falcon is a nearly perfect movie, but it is absolutely ruined by Mary Astor as the femme fatale.
She's supposed to be this stunningly beautiful woman, Spade's Secretary warns him to brace himself before she comes in because "she's a looker." Then she enters, and she's just sort of normal. Then his partner comes in and completely loses his shit over how gorgeous she is, and I'm sitting there thinking "Her? What's the big deal?"
Throughout the entire film, she's portrayed as this conniving woman whom Bogey can't resist, but I just didn't see any chemistry at all.
I told my son, who is an extremely knowledgeable cinephile, and he told me that's a thing. Filmies have noticed how absolutely wrong she was for that part. She was a fine actress, but that role called for a completely different kind of actress. It was probably a studio thing, insisting that she get the part, since she was between pictures, and they wanted something high profile to boost her career, and a Bogey mystery would be perfect. Unfortunately, she was terrible in that role.
Who should replace her? Pretty much anyone else at the time, maybe Barbara Stanwyck.
Suicide Squad. Jared Leto is replaced by Jim Carrey.
I honestly can't tell if I'm serious about this or not.
Honestly, any movie Leto is in, replacing him with Jim Carrey would improve it.
Could you imagine a world in which Jim Carrey gets hacked to death by future-Batman to then be the Batfleck's arch nemesis? Maybe that post-apocalyptic post credit scene would finally have some reasonable pacing and nuance.
Jesus... Jared Leto made me say that Jim Carrey as a Batman villain would have nuance...
Remove Joel Silver from the production team of the Matrix: Reloaded and Revolutions. Creative control to the Wachowskis.
Allow the countercultural, noir elements that made the first Matrix excellent. Police and innocent bystanders are potential if not actual enemies. Fewer set-piece fights; more skillful, thoughtful moments like the fight against Seraph.
And, certainly, a different end-fight arc. Once Smith has the Oracle's power, a slugfest stops making sense.
I guess Steven Seagall movies are the low-hanging fruit, huh?
Okay, semi-semi-serious answer: the first Aliens Vs Predator movie. I replace the predator with Animal from the Muppet Show. That would at least make the movie fun.
Seagal was perfect in Executive Decision though (he dies in the first 10 minutes)
Replacing any character from any movie with any Muppet makes the movie immediately better.
The Borderlands movie. Anyone other than who they casted. Lilith is between late 20s to middle 30s. Roland is supposed to be a intimidating soldier. And Jack Black for Claptrap?! Come on
I'm so tired of the jack black train.
Valerian. Recast both leads if you can, but in a pinch just DeHaan. Give Valerian himself a single iota of charisma and the movie ends up a slight but interesting lark instead of a slog.
There’s a line I’ve heard a couple times that if you swapped the pairs from Valerian and Passengers, both movies end up better, if maybe not quite “good.”
There's such weird chemistry in Valerian, that they seem like brother and sister.
But that's on brand for Luc Besson, who wanted Leon to be even creepier than it is.
All bad movies
Replace all actors with Nick Cage
Including the bad nick cage movies. Just add more nick cage to fix it.
Snow White and the Huntsman could have been decent, but Kristen Stewart is terrible in it. She's not a bad actress (see Underwater) but she's not the right fit at all here.
I strongly disagree that Kirsten Stewart has an iota of talent as an actress. She has two emotions she expresses: sulky and panicky, and she does neither well. She was no better than her baseline in Underwater and that film wasn’t very good either IMO (and I love Cthulhu stuff).
However, I didn’t like Snow White and the Huntsman either. I saw it years ago but can’t really remember much about it, because I found rather bland. It wasn’t just Stewart’s milquetoast performance.
Kristen Stewart is an utterly shitty actress.
Star wars prequels. Jarjar replaced by nobody.
I still want to visit the alternate timeline where Lucas didn't cave to fan pressure. And the big reveal in Ep 3 is that Jar Jar is revealed to be the Sith Lord. Could Lucas have pulled off a Shyamalan-level surprise? We'll never know.
Replacing Chris Pratt in Jurassic Park. He's cringe
Recasting Chris Pratt in all of his movies would greatly improve all of them.
He's bad in those movies, but I don't think it fixes them. Not by a long shot.
I could improve on the film adaptation of Eragon by replacing the entire cast with Thunderbirds-style puppets.