the fuck's an "activist investor"? No, I read the article and clicked the link, it's some "activist investment company", which still leaves the question open. Maybe I should ask "What the fuck is activist investing"?
this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2025
164 points (97.1% liked)
News
36142 readers
3607 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Requiring the company to do more than provide short term stock growth. Generally they want the company to behave somewhat responsibly or ethically. A desire to not simply maximize profits. They have to have a big chunk of stock or proxy votes since the only way they can influence the company is by removing or adding board members.
Investment group buys a significant portion of stock (large enough to sway shareholder voting), then they demand changes in the company with the threat of ousting the current executives/board via their voting power. Their goal is to make the stock valuation go up, then sell off the stock for profit.
I mean, the name should make it self-explanatory, but here, I googled it for you: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/shareholderactivist.asp
Do you know what the word "activist" means? Do you know what the word "investor" means? Put the two together and you have your answer. This isn't rocket science.
load more comments
(1 replies)
A 2 liter bottle of soda costs pennies to produce and they sell it for three bucks. An 8 ounce glass of it in a restaurant will cost you three or four bucks. I haven't purchased soda in about five years. It is the biggest ripoff and not even good for you.
and not even good for you
Dude, soda isn't 'not good' for you. It's fucking toxic. Corn sugar makes you fat and screws up your metabolism, added caffeine is addictive, and the rest is just an artificial chemical bath that rots you from the inside out.
There was a lawsuit a while back, a dude sued claiming he found a dead mouse in his can of soda. Pepsi's defense was that in the amount of time between when that particular can was bottled and when he drank it, the soda would have completely dissolved the mouse. They won the lawsuit.
And that's what you are drinking..
Just because the mouse would have been dissolved doesn't mean that the ingredients responsible are harmful to consume. It's just citric acid.
There's a pretty big difference in doses between drinking a soda and soaking in a vat of it for months.
People still shouldn't drink soda, but your argument against it is on par with freaking out because McDonald's burgers don't grow mold (because there's not enough moisture and lots of salt).
Yeah, blended oranges would dissolve a rat over a few weeks too.
Okay that's fair.
Also the Super Size Me guy did the mcdonalds mold test- the burgers all decayed, the fries didn't decay at all.
Man, you should see what salt does to a mouse.
Preserves it?
Yeah, if there is one (uncontroversial) thing to cut out of your diet it's probably soda. I have not verified the claim above, but adding all that refined sugar into your diet in a way that doesn't even curb your hunger is bound to spell trouble.
Man, US soda makes me gag. In don't know how you guys deal with HFCS in EVERYTHING over there.
Because 90% of consumers don't give a fuck what's in their food. They buy whatever is on the shelf and eat it without a second thought. And the government doesn't regulate such things much, so the EU version of something has 5 ingredients and the US version has 20 and most of those 90% never read the list.
The next 5% would like to eat better but are burned out. It's fucking hard, because every other 'natural' 'healthy' product is the same shit just a little bit less son. I'm in this group. I can't tell you how many times I buy something that looks natural and healthy only to realize it's the same chemical shit just in a different 'healthy looking' package.
I don't drink soda though. Probably 95% of what I drink is water, the rest is some variant of coffee or tea.
The last 5% are the ones who really pay attention- who still check every ingredient, who spend a bunch of time cooking regularly, who buy mostly organic products or natural foods (which are significantly more expensive). Most of these people don't drink soda anyway no matter how it's sweetened so soda companies don't bother with them.
PepsiCo said it also plans to accelerate the introduction of new offerings with simpler and more functional ingredients, including Doritos Protein
Oh, FFS, this shit again. Holy shit I am so tired of the obsession with protein. You'd think there was some kind of shortage or that this was a miracle macronutrient.
Protein is now like Idiocracy's electrolytes.
It was already crazy stupid having conversations about things like vegetarianism prior to all this dumb marketing (and never mind the fad diets like keto and carnivore and paleo and ancestral, JFC), but now it's like you have all that background noise to deal with when the topic of being a vegetarian comes up - "do you supplement with PROTEIN? You don't? How are you even alive?"
/facepalm
My answer every time that came up, which is about once a week, is protein is in nearly everything you eat. Peanut butter, bread, rice, oats, eggs, ice cream, pizza, beans, etc. Also, humans don't need nearly as much protein as people think, unless they are athletes or have a dietary condition. Most Americans eat far more protein than they need.
Yes. Yes to all of this. The silly bro science from gym rat types has infected a lot of the public mind, that's for sure...
Another corollary to this is the one people use is that "but I'm an athlete". LOL, no. Just because you have a gym membership and go for a bi-yearly jog does not make one an athlete. People seem to have severely perverted that term for one, and secondly, except for the very most extreme of athletes, the protein in the typical diet (omnivore or otherwise) is probably more than sufficient.
But yeah, if someone has done even one pushup in the past year they think they have to maximize their protein intake to keep their muscle gains, bro!
People do farm labor by hand on a diet of mostly white rice! Sure that isn't the best diet, but you're fine
It makes sense when you realize people are dumb. They can charge 50% more for all product that is almost identical with half a cent of protein powder mixed in per bag.
Oh yes. The marketing people have hit the absolute jackpot on the protein myth, that's for sure.
I'm just surprised that Tyson or others have not started selling specially-branded chicken breasts (with EXTRA PROTEIN!) for all the gym bros that throw back lots of chicken breasts as-is. I haven't actually looked, maybe they are already doing that.
I remember having a bit of chuckle over the "protein bars" in the 90s and instead of laughing, maybe I should have started my own version of these ~~candy bars~~ protein bars to sell to ~~marks~~ consumers.
The best grift was Cheerios protein that just upped the serving size by 50%.
Wow, that's a wild grift. People are so gullible. I have no idea when and how the protein thing started, but it seems to somehow be getting even stupider.
Time for some HDP
load more comments
(3 replies)
more free ads disguised as news for dyed sugar water, fried corn shit and single use plastic waste purveyors? hail megacorp.
have you seen that prebiotic pepsi shit? who the fuck thought that up...garbage. absolutely garbage.
good news for serious sugar water consumers
They can eliminate all of their products for all I care. I'm still boycotting PepsiCo and all related products.
Maybe that activist investor should be pushing them to leave the Russian market like competitors such as Coca Cola due to the invasion of Ukraine. Pepsi is actively increasing their market in the country and thereby helping fund the war with increased tax revenue.
Hmmmmmmmmmmm.............
As long as they don't mess with my Mountain Dew, we're good.
Ewwwww, I'll have the crab juice
Only khlav kalash!
Alright, give me a bowl
No bowl! Stick, stick!
Good, that means more for me.
Interesting.
Might be nice to see companies compete on price again.
For real food, yes. I want to see soda taxed out of existence, and junk snacks taxed to endangered.
( X ) DOUBT
Do they have something not poisonous?
PepsiCo said it also plans to accelerate the introduction of new offerings with simpler and more functional ingredients, including Doritos Protein and Simply NKD Cheetos and Doritos, which contain no artificial flavors or colors. The company also recently introduced a prebiotic version of its signature cola.
I mean, no, they don't, but it's at least a small step in the right direction.
doritos protein in a pepsi, that sounds disgusting.